Paper · 2021 · E3S Web of Conferences

Effect of different types of mulch on bulb yield of shallot

Gina Aliya Sopha; Agnofi Merdeka Efendi

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The possibility of using different types of mulch to improve the bulb yield of shallot ( Allium cepa var aggregatum) is observed in this paper. The field experiment compared five different types of mulches, including silver, black, straw, screen nylon, and clear plastic mulches, with a non-mulch as a control treatment. Straw mulch and screen nylon mulch reduced shallot biomass but did not significantly affect bulb yield than the control treatment. At the same time, clear plastic mulch increased fresh bulb yield significantly by 30% from 10.26 t ha -1 to 13.29 t ha -1 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch reduced shallot biomass relative to no mulch.

Treatment
Straw mulche0
Outcome
shallot biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw mulch and screen nylon mulch reduced shallot biomass but did not significantly affect bulb yield than the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of different types of mulch on bulb yield of shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Screen nylon mulch reduced shallot biomass relative to no mulch.

Treatment
screen nylon mulche0
Outcome
shallot biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw mulch and screen nylon mulch reduced shallot biomass but did not significantly affect bulb yield than the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of different types of mulch on bulb yield of shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch did not significantly change shallot bulb yield relative to no mulch.

Treatment
Straw mulche0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw mulch and screen nylon mulch reduced shallot biomass but did not significantly affect bulb yield than the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of different types of mulch on bulb yield of shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Screen nylon mulch did not significantly change shallot bulb yield relative to no mulch.

Treatment
screen nylon mulche0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw mulch and screen nylon mulch reduced shallot biomass but did not significantly affect bulb yield than the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of different types of mulch on bulb yield of shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clear plastic mulch increased fresh shallot bulb yield significantly by 30%, from 10.26 to 13.29 t ha -1.

Treatment
clear plastic mulche0
Outcome
fresh bulb yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30%e0
Qualifier
from 10.26 t ha -1 to 13.29 t ha -1e0
Comparator
non-mulche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clear plastic mulch increased fresh bulb yield significantly by 30% from 10.26 t ha -1 to 13.29 t ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of different types of mulch on bulb yield of shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“with a non-mulch as a control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–319 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

mulching · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

organic · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.