Paper · 2021 · Insects

Management of Onion Thrips (Thrips tabaci) in Organic Onion Production Using Multiple IPM Tactics

Lindsy Iglesias; Michael J. Havey; Brian A. Nault

14
claims
48
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Onion thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman) is a major pest in organic onion production and effective integrated pest management strategies are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate combinations of semi-glossy (“Rossa di Milano” and B5336AxB5351C) and waxy (“Bradley”) onion cultivars with reflective mulch, with or without biopesticides (spinosad + neem oil tank mix), to manage T. tabaci in organic onion production. Thrips densities were assessed weekly and bulbs graded and weighed at harvest. Onions sprayed with spinosad + neem oil had fewer T. tabaci (adults: 74% (2019); larvae: 40% (2018), 84% (2019) and produced higher yields (13% (2018), 23% (2019)) than onions that were unsprayed, regardless of mulch type or onion cultivar. “Rossa di Milano” had relatively fewer adult and larval thrips populations compared with “Bradley” (21% (2018), 32% (2019)) and B5336AxB5351C. However, “Rossa di Milano” had the lowest marketable yield in both years. Reflective mulch reduced densities on certain dates in both years compared to white mulch, but the largest and most consistent reduction only occurred in 2019. Reflective mulch had no impact on bulb yield. While spinosad + neem oil reduced thrips numbers and increased yield alone, none of the treatment combinations were effective at suppressing populations of thrips. Future T. tabaci management in organic onions will require optimization of the available effective biopesticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed onions had 74% fewer adult thrips in 2019 than unsprayed onions.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
spinosad + neem oile0
Interactor
T. tabaciThrips tabacie0peste1
Outcome
T. tabacie0
Direction
fewere0
Value
74%e0
Comparator
unsprayede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Onions sprayed with spinosad + neem oil had fewer T. tabaci (adults: 74% (2019)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–572 · show in text ↑
e1

“than onions that were unsprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed onions had 40% fewer thrips larvae in 2018.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
spinosad + neem oile1
Interactor
T. tabaciThrips tabacie1pest
Outcome
larvaee0
Direction
fewere1
Value
40%e0
Comparator
unsprayede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“larvae: 40% (2018), 84% (2019)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–604 · show in text ↑
e1

“Onions sprayed with spinosad + neem oil had fewer T. tabaci (adults: 74% (2019); larvae: 40% (2018), 84% (2019) and produced higher yields (13% (2018), 23% (2019)) than onions that were unsprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed onions had 84% fewer thrips larvae in 2019.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
spinosad + neem oile1
Interactor
T. tabaciThrips tabacie1pest
Outcome
larvaee0
Direction
fewere1
Value
84%e0
Comparator
unsprayede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“larvae: 40% (2018), 84% (2019)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–604 · show in text ↑
e1

“Onions sprayed with spinosad + neem oil had fewer T. tabaci (adults: 74% (2019); larvae: 40% (2018), 84% (2019) and produced higher yields (13% (2018), 23% (2019)) than onions that were unsprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed onions yielded 13% more in 2018 than unsprayed onions.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
spinosad + neem oile1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
unsprayede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“produced higher yields (13% (2018), 23% (2019)) than onions that were unsprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–688 · show in text ↑
e1

“Onions sprayed with spinosad + neem oil had fewer T. tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed onions yielded 23% more in 2019 than unsprayed onions.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
spinosad + neem oile1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
unsprayede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“produced higher yields (13% (2018), 23% (2019)) than onions that were unsprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–688 · show in text ↑
e1

“Onions sprayed with spinosad + neem oil had fewer T. tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rossa di Milano had 21% fewer thrips than Bradley in 2018.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Material
Rossa di Milanoe0
Interactor
thripsThripse0peste1
Outcome
adult and larval thrips populationse0
Direction
fewere0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
Bradleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

““Rossa di Milano” had relatively fewer adult and larval thrips populations compared with “Bradley” (21% (2018), 32% (2019))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–857 · show in text ↑
e1

““Rossa di Milano” had relatively fewer adult and larval thrips populations compared with “Bradley” (21% (2018), 32% (2019))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rossa di Milano had 32% fewer thrips than Bradley in 2019.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Material
Rossa di Milanoe0
Interactor
thripsThripse0peste1
Outcome
adult and larval thrips populationse0
Direction
fewere0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
Bradleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

““Rossa di Milano” had relatively fewer adult and larval thrips populations compared with “Bradley” (21% (2018), 32% (2019))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–857 · show in text ↑
e1

““Rossa di Milano” had relatively fewer adult and larval thrips populations compared with “Bradley” (21% (2018), 32% (2019))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rossa di Milano had fewer thrips than B5336AxB5351C.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Material
Rossa di Milanoe0
Interactor
thripsThripse0peste1
Outcome
adult and larval thrips populationse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
B5336AxB5351Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

““Rossa di Milano” had relatively fewer adult and larval thrips populations compared with “Bradley” (21% (2018), 32% (2019)) and B5336AxB5351C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–875 · show in text ↑
e1

““Rossa di Milano” had relatively fewer adult and larval thrips populations compared with “Bradley” (21% (2018), 32% (2019)) and B5336AxB5351C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rossa di Milano had the lowest marketable yield in both years.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Material
Rossa di Milanoe0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

““Rossa di Milano” had the lowest marketable yield in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–949 · show in text ↑
e1

““Rossa di Milano” had the lowest marketable yield in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reflective mulch reduced thrips densities on certain dates versus white mulch.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Reflective mulche0
Interactor
Thrips tabaciThrips tabacit1pest
Outcome
densitiese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
certain dates in both yearse0
Comparator
white mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reflective mulch reduced densities on certain dates in both years compared to white mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reflective mulch reduced densities on certain dates in both years compared to white mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Management of Onion Thrips (Thrips tabaci) in Organic Onion Production Using Multiple IPM Tactics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
t1

“Management of Onion Thrips (Thrips tabaci) in Organic Onion Production Using Multiple IPM Tactics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reflective mulch had its largest and most consistent thrips reduction in 2019.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Reflective mulche1
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
largeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the largest and most consistent reduction only occurred in 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1109 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reflective mulch reduced densities on certain dates in both years compared to white mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reflective mulch had no impact on onion bulb yield.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Reflective mulche0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
no impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reflective mulch had no impact on bulb yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reflective mulch had no impact on bulb yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the treatment combinations suppressed thrips populations effectively.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
treatment combinationse0
Interactor
thripsThripse0peste1
Outcome
populations of thripse0
Direction
nonee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the treatment combinations were effective at suppressing populations of thrips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1319 · show in text ↑
e1

“none of the treatment combinations were effective at suppressing populations of thrips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“Organic Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend optimizing effective biopesticides for future onion thrips management.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Interactor
T. tabaciThrips tabacie0peste1
Outcome
optimization of the available effective biopesticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Future T. tabaci management in organic onions will require optimization of the available effective biopesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1433 · show in text ↑
e1

“Future T. tabaci management in organic onions will require optimization of the available effective biopesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1433 · show in text ↑

spinosad · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

spinosad · Thrips tabaci · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

botanical · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

mulching · Thrips tabaci · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Thrips tabaci · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.