Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Enhancing Grain Yield and Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat Plants Grown under a Mediterranean Arid Environment by Foliar Spray with Papain-Released Whey Peptides

AbdAllah M. El-Sanatawy; Salwa M. A. I. Ash-Shormillesy; Ahmed Abou El-Yazied; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Due to their beneficial, stimulating impact on plant growth, productivity, and alleviating environmental stresses, protein hydrolysates have recently received increasing attention as a possible substitute. This investigation aimed to explore the effects of foliar application of papain-produced whey protein hydrolysates (WPH) on the yield attributes and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of soft wheat. Wheat plants were cultivated under a Mediterranean arid environment and received four soil nitrogen (N) fertilization levels with ammonium nitrate (145, 185, 215, and 250 kg N ha−1) and compared to control treatment and urea foliar application. WPH increased grain yield, yield attributes, and N accumulation in wheat plants. Partial productivity factors of applied nitrogen, as NUE indicators under relatively steady-state cropping systems, were also enhanced by WPH compared to control treatment. WPH significantly improved flag leaf area, spike number m−2, and grain yield compared to urea foliar application. Increasing the soil N fertilization level from 145 up to 215 kg N ha−1 was accompanied by significant increases in all yield traits and N accumulation measurements, except for the partial factor productivity of applied N, which decreased. A strong positive association was detected among grain and straw yields, their attributes, and total N uptake. Results highlighted the efficacy of WPH in increasing wheat yield and NUE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPH increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
WPHe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WPH increased grain yield, yield attributes, and N accumulation in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPH increased yield attributes in wheat.

Treatment
WPHe0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WPH increased grain yield, yield attributes, and N accumulation in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPH increased nitrogen accumulation in wheat.

Treatment
WPHe0
Outcome
N accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WPH increased grain yield, yield attributes, and N accumulation in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WPH improved partial productivity factors of applied nitrogen versus control.

Treatment
WPHe0
Outcome
Partial productivity factors of applied nitrogene0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Partial productivity factors of applied nitrogen, as NUE indicators under relatively steady-state cropping systems, were also enhanced by WPH compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WPH significantly improved flag leaf area versus urea.

Treatment
WPHe0
Outcome
flag leaf areae0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
urea foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WPH significantly improved flag leaf area, spike number m−2, and grain yield compared to urea foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1011 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WPH significantly improved spike number versus urea.

Treatment
WPHe0
Outcome
spike number m−2e0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
urea foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WPH significantly improved flag leaf area, spike number m−2, and grain yield compared to urea foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1011 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WPH significantly improved grain yield versus urea.

Treatment
WPHe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
urea foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WPH significantly improved flag leaf area, spike number m−2, and grain yield compared to urea foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1011 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilization from 145 to 215 kg N ha−1 increased yield traits.

Treatment
soil N fertilization level from 145 up to 215 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
all yield traitse0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
145e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the soil N fertilization level from 145 up to 215 kg N ha−1 was accompanied by significant increases in all yield traits and N accumulation measurements, except for the partial factor productivity of applied N, which decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilization increased nitrogen accumulation.

Treatment
soil N fertilization level from 145 up to 215 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
N accumulation measurementse0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
145e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the soil N fertilization level from 145 up to 215 kg N ha−1 was accompanied by significant increases in all yield traits and N accumulation measurements, except for the partial factor productivity of applied N, which decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilization decreased partial factor productivity.

Treatment
soil N fertilization level from 145 up to 215 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
partial factor productivity of applied Ne0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
145e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the soil N fertilization level from 145 up to 215 kg N ha−1 was accompanied by significant increases in all yield traits and N accumulation measurements, except for the partial factor productivity of applied N, which decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–398 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and straw yields, yield attributes, and nitrogen uptake were positively associated.

Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A strong positive association was detected among grain and straw yields, their attributes, and total N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1361 · show in text ↑
e1

“soft wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–398 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.