Abstract
This study was carried out under field conditions to determine the effects of foliar urea, potassium sulphate (K2SO4) and zinc sulphate heptahydrate (ZnSO4.7H2O) treatments at vegetative and generative periods on yield, technological quality and mineral element concentrations of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Altinbasak). Experiments were conducted in two experiment groups (foliar treatments of 0% (Control); 0.5% Urea; 1% Urea; 0.5% ZnSO4.7H2O; 0.5% Urea+0.5% ZnSO4.7H2O; 1% Urea+0.5% ZnSO4.7H2O; 0.5% K2SO4 and 1% K2SO4 were performed in the first experiment and foliar 0%; 0.5% Urea+0.5% K2SO4; 0.5% Urea+1% K2SO4; 1% Urea+0.5% K2SO4; 1% Urea+1% K2SO4 were performed in the second experiment). All treatments increased yield and sedimentation values as compared to the control treatments. In the first experiment, 0.5% urea treatment was prominent for yield, nitrogen and protein and urea+ZnSO4.7H2O treatments for grain zinc and iron concentrations. In the second experiment, 1% urea+0.5% K2SO4 treatments were prominent for protein and grain nitrogen concentrations and 1% urea+1% K2SO4 and 0.5% urea+0.5% K2SO4 treatments for yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
All foliar treatments increased wheat yield relative to controls.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Material
- Altinbasake1
- Treatment
- All treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“All treatments increased yield and sedimentation values as compared to the control treatments.”
e1“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Altinbasak)”
Claim · model-written summary
All foliar treatments increased wheat sedimentation values relative to controls.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- All treatmentse0
- Outcome
- sedimentation valuese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“All treatments increased yield and sedimentation values as compared to the control treatments.”
e1“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Altinbasak)”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first experiment, 0.5% urea was prominent for wheat yield.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 0.5% urea treatmente0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- prominente0
- Qualifier
- first experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In the first experiment, 0.5% urea treatment was prominent for yield, nitrogen and protein”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first experiment, 0.5% urea was prominent for wheat nitrogen and protein.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 0.5% urea treatmente0
- Outcome
- nitrogen and proteine0
- Direction
- prominente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In the first experiment, 0.5% urea treatment was prominent for yield, nitrogen and protein”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
In the first experiment, urea plus zinc sulphate treatments were prominent for grain zinc and iron concentrations.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- urea+ZnSO4.7H2O treatmentse0
- Outcome
- grain zinc and iron concentrationse0
- Direction
- prominente1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“urea+ZnSO4.7H2O treatments for grain zinc and iron concentrations”
e1“0.5% urea treatment was prominent for yield, nitrogen and protein and urea+ZnSO4.7H2O treatments for grain zinc and iron concentrations”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second experiment, 1% urea plus 0.5% potassium sulphate was prominent for wheat protein and grain nitrogen concentrations.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 1% urea+0.5% K2SO4 treatmentse0
- Outcome
- protein and grain nitrogen concentrationse0
- Direction
- prominente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“1% urea+0.5% K2SO4 treatments were prominent for protein and grain nitrogen concentrations”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second experiment, 1% urea plus 1% potassium sulphate was prominent for yield.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 1% urea+1% K2SO4e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- prominente1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“1% urea+1% K2SO4 and 0.5% urea+0.5% K2SO4 treatments for yield”
e1“1% urea+0.5% K2SO4 treatments were prominent for protein and grain nitrogen concentrations and 1% urea+1% K2SO4 and 0.5% urea+0.5% K2SO4 treatments for yield”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second experiment, 0.5% urea plus 0.5% potassium sulphate was prominent for yield.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 0.5% urea+0.5% K2SO4e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- prominente1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“1% urea+1% K2SO4 and 0.5% urea+0.5% K2SO4 treatments for yield”
e1“1% urea+0.5% K2SO4 treatments were prominent for protein and grain nitrogen concentrations and 1% urea+1% K2SO4 and 0.5% urea+0.5% K2SO4 treatments for yield”
t0“WHEAT”
The same questions in other papers
potassium sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →potassium sulfate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
450 papers more in this group
See all 454 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
475 papers more in this group
See all 479 papers →nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
2,057 papers more in this group
See all 2,061 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.