Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology

Impact of Gamma Irradiation on Tomato, and Pepper Growth Parameters, Phytochemical, Nematode Infectivity and detection of DNA Damage by Comet Assay

Entsar Taha; R. Shoaib

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Root -knot nematode is a challenge of most vegetable production and there is a critical need to an alternative, effective, safe technique for control. The main objective of this study was to detect the effect of five doses of gamma irradiation on Meloidogyne incognita (Mi) infectivity, host growth, and DNA damage. Three-week-old- seedlings of: tomato, (Solanum lycopersicum), and pepper (Capsicum annum), were irradiated with five doses i.e. 100, 250,500,750, and 1000 Gy and transplanted in 20cm diameter pots in the screen-house. Halves of the replicates/ dose were inoculated with 1000 2IJs, while others were kept as controls. DNA damage was measured by comet assay which performed on the host leaves. Data demonstrated that, all nematode parameters were decreased beginning from the lowest does (100Gy), while, the plant growth parameters were enhanced significantly at 100 and 250Gy even when infected with nematodes and so did the chlorophyll a,b, carotenoids, and total phenols, antioxidative enzymes; Polyphenol oxidase (PPO), peroxidase (POX), Catalase (CAT) and Superoxide dismutase (SOD). Likewise, quantity of DNA damage was represented as mean of % DNA in tail, tail moment, tail length, and olive tail moment which were more pronounced than the control. As a conclusion, gamma irradiation at 100 and 250 Gy could protect host plants of nematode infection and increase the plant growth. Therefore, this approach introduces a promising technique in the integrated pest programs without any suppressive effects on the growth of plant hosts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation lowered nematode parameters beginning at 100 Gy.

Treatment
gamma irradiatione2
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Outcome
nematode parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
100Gye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all nematode parameters were decreased beginning from the lowest does (100Gy)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–809 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, (Solanum lycopersicum), and pepper (Capsicum annum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“gamma irradiation on Meloidogyne incognita (Mi) infectivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation at 100 and 250 Gy significantly enhanced host growth, even with nematodes.

Treatment
100 and 250Gye0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant growth parameters were enhanced significantly at 100 and 250Gy even when infected with nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–924 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, (Solanum lycopersicum), and pepper (Capsicum annum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“gamma irradiation on Meloidogyne incognita (Mi) infectivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation increased chlorophyll and carotenoids.

Treatment
gamma irradiatione2
Outcome
chlorophyll a,b, carotenoidse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“so did the chlorophyll a,b, carotenoids, and total phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, (Solanum lycopersicum), and pepper (Capsicum annum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“gamma irradiation on Meloidogyne incognita (Mi) infectivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation increased total phenols.

Treatment
gamma irradiatione2
Outcome
total phenolse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“so did the chlorophyll a,b, carotenoids, and total phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, (Solanum lycopersicum), and pepper (Capsicum annum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“gamma irradiation on Meloidogyne incognita (Mi) infectivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation increased antioxidative enzyme measures.

Treatment
gamma irradiatione2
Outcome
antioxidative enzymese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidative enzymes; Polyphenol oxidase (PPO), peroxidase (POX), Catalase (CAT) and Superoxide dismutase (SOD).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, (Solanum lycopersicum), and pepper (Capsicum annum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“gamma irradiation on Meloidogyne incognita (Mi) infectivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation increased DNA damage measures relative to control.

Treatment
gamma irradiatione2
Outcome
quantity of DNA damagee0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quantity of DNA damage was represented as mean of % DNA in tail, tail moment, tail length, and olive tail moment which were more pronounced than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1270 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, (Solanum lycopersicum), and pepper (Capsicum annum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“gamma irradiation on Meloidogyne incognita (Mi) infectivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–285 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

23 papers: 13 positive, 10 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

radiation · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

radiation · cytology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

radiation · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

radiation · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.