Paper · 2016 · Biologia Plantarum

Anatomy, photochemical activity, and DNA polymorphism in leaves of dwarf tomato irradiated with X-rays

C. Arena; M. Turano; B. Hay Mele; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The response of higher plants to ionising radiation depends on factors related to both radiation properties and plant features including species, cultivar, age, and structural complexity of the target organ. Adult plants of dwarf tomato were irradiated with different doses of X-rays to investigate possible variations in leaf morpho-anatomical traits, photosynthetic efficiency, and genomic DNA. In order to assess if and how responses depend on leaf developmental stage, we analysed two types of leaves; nearly mature leaves (L1) and actively developing leaves (L2), whose lamina size corresponded to 70 and 25 %, respectively, of the lamina size of the fully expanded leaves. The results show that the X-rays prevented full lamina expansion of the L2 leaves at all doses and induced early death of tissue of plants irradiated with doses higher than 20 Gy. Most anatomical modifications were not clearly dose-dependent and the radiation-induced increase in phenolic compounds was irrespective of dose. At high doses of X-rays (50 and 100 Gy), photochemical efficiency decreased significantly in both leaf types, whereas total chlorophyll content significantly decreased only in the L2 leaves. The random amplification of polymorphic DNA data show that the X-rays induced mutagenic effects in the L2 leaves even at low doses despite the absence of severe phenotypic alterations. Genetic structure found in the population of samples corroborates the results of anatomical and eco-physiological analyses: the 20 Gy dose seems to mark the threshold dose above which genetic alterations, structural anomalies, and perturbations in the photosynthetic apparatus become significant, especially in the actively expanding leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X-rays prevented full expansion of actively developing leaves at all doses.

Taxon
dwarf tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Organ / stage
L2 leavese0
Treatment
X-rayse0
Outcome
full lamina expansione0
Direction
preventede0
Qualifier
at all dosese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the X-rays prevented full lamina expansion of the L2 leaves at all doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–773 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adult plants of dwarf tomato were irradiated with different doses of X-rays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X-ray doses above 20 Gy induced early tissue death.

Taxon
dwarf tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
doses higher than 20 Gye0
Outcome
early death of tissuee0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“induced early death of tissue of plants irradiated with doses higher than 20 Gy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adult plants of dwarf tomato were irradiated with different doses of X-rays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–283 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most X-ray-induced anatomical changes were not clearly dose dependent.

Taxon
dwarf tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
X-rayse1
Outcome
anatomical modificationse0
Direction
not clearly dose-dependente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most anatomical modifications were not clearly dose-dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adult plants of dwarf tomato were irradiated with different doses of X-rays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X-rays increased phenolic compounds irrespective of dose.

Taxon
dwarf tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
radiatione0
Outcome
phenolic compoundse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
irrespective of dosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the radiation-induced increase in phenolic compounds was irrespective of dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adult plants of dwarf tomato were irradiated with different doses of X-rays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 and 100 Gy, X-rays significantly decreased photochemical efficiency in both leaf types.

Taxon
dwarf tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
X-rays (50 and 100 Gy)e0
Outcome
photochemical efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
both leaf typese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At high doses of X-rays (50 and 100 Gy), photochemical efficiency decreased significantly in both leaf types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adult plants of dwarf tomato were irradiated with different doses of X-rays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At high X-ray doses, total chlorophyll content significantly decreased only in developing leaves.

Taxon
dwarf tomatoSolanum lycopersicume2
Organ / stage
L2 leavese0
Treatment
X-rays (50 and 100 Gy)e1
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll content significantly decreased only in the L2 leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1194 · show in text ↑
e1

“At high doses of X-rays (50 and 100 Gy)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1043 · show in text ↑
e2

“Adult plants of dwarf tomato were irradiated with different doses of X-rays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X-rays caused detectable mutagenic effects in developing leaves even at low doses.

Taxon
dwarf tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Organ / stage
L2 leavese0
Treatment
X-rayse0
Outcome
mutagenic effectse0
Direction
inducede0
Qualifier
even at low dosese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the X-rays induced mutagenic effects in the L2 leaves even at low doses despite the absence of severe phenotypic alterations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1379 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adult plants of dwarf tomato were irradiated with different doses of X-rays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–283 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret 20 Gy as the threshold above which genetic, anatomical and photosynthetic perturbations become significant, especially in developing leaves.

Taxon
dwarf tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Outcome
genetic alterations, structural anomalies, and perturbations in the photosynthetic apparatuse0
Value
20 Gye0
Qualifier
especially in the actively expanding leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 20 Gy dose seems to mark the threshold dose above which genetic alterations, structural anomalies, and perturbations in the photosynthetic apparatus become significant, especially in the actively expanding leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1721 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adult plants of dwarf tomato were irradiated with different doses of X-rays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–283 · show in text ↑

radiation · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

radiation · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.