Paper · 2021 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Changes in phenolic compounds, enzymatic and non‐enzymatic antioxidant properties in “Thompson Seedless” grape after UV‐C irradiation

Ehsan Ranjbaran; Mansour Gholami; Martin Jensen

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, the influence of postharvest UV-C irradiation on phenolic compounds, enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants was assessed in table grape “Thompson Seedless” during short storage. The berries were exposed to UV-C at doses of 0, 0.8, 1.2, and 4.2 kJ/m2 and then stored at 15°C for 6 d to simulate retail condition. The result showed that UV-C treatment increased total phenolic content of the skin at the harvest time and its level remain unchanged during storage. Total flavonoid content of treated berries, however, dramatically increased. The increasing impact of UV-C on antioxidant activity of treated berries was evident; however, it varies in different assays performed. In contrast with PPO controlled under the lower doses of radiation, activity of PAL and POD were induced after irradiation. Similar to total phenolics, individual ones including catechin, quercetin, and rutin were largely affected by UV-C irradiation (especially at the doses of 0.8 and 1.2 kJ/m2), except epicatechin. These results indicated that mild doses of UV-C irradiation augmented the antioxidant capacity of table grapes, given a correlation between polyphenol content and these characteristics. Furthermore, along with the increased antioxidant enzymes, UV-C treatment could enhance berry tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress, which seems to need further research. Novelty impact statement Total phenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant potential of table grapes increased after UV-C irradiation. Although PAL and POD activity was increased under UV-C irradiation, lower doses of UV-C restricted the PPO activity. Contrary to epicatechin and resveratrol, UV-C irradiation induced catechin, quercetin, and rutin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C increased grape skin total phenolics at harvest, with the level unchanged during storage.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
skine0
Treatment
UV-C treatmente0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at the harvest time and its level remain unchanged during storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“UV-C treatment increased total phenolic content of the skin at the harvest time and its level remain unchanged during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C dramatically increased total flavonoids in treated berries.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
UV-Ce1
Outcome
Total flavonoid contente0
Direction
dramatically increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total flavonoid content of treated berries, however, dramatically increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“UV-C treatment increased total phenolic content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C increased antioxidant activity, with effects varying by assay.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
UV-Ce0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
varies in different assays performede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing impact of UV-C on antioxidant activity of treated berries was evident; however, it varies in different assays performed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower UV-C doses restricted PPO activity.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
lower doses of UV-Ce0
Gene
PPOe0
Outcome
PPO activitye0
Direction
restrictede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lower doses of UV-C restricted the PPO activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C increased PAL and POD activity.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
UV-C irradiatione0
Gene
PAL and PODe0
Outcome
PAL and POD activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“PAL and POD activity was increased under UV-C irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C induced catechin, quercetin, and rutin.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
UV-C irradiatione0
Outcome
catechin, quercetin, and rutine0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“UV-C irradiation induced catechin, quercetin, and rutin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epicatechin and resveratrol were exceptions to the UV-C induction.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
UV-C irradiatione0
Outcome
epicatechin and resveratrole0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Contrary to epicatechin and resveratrol, UV-C irradiation induced catechin, quercetin, and rutin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors inferred mild UV-C doses augment grape antioxidant capacity, associated with polyphenols.

Taxon
table grapese0
Treatment
mild doses of UV-C irradiatione0
Compound
polyphenol contente0
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
augmentede0

Verbatim

e0

“mild doses of UV-C irradiation augmented the antioxidant capacity of table grapes, given a correlation between polyphenol content and these characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1195 · show in text ↑

uv · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.