Paper · 2009 · China Brewing

Effects of different intensities of UV-B radiation on the quality of grape

Gao Ming-liang

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

On the basis of outdoor natural sunlight, four radiation intensities including 0μW/cm2(CK), 10.2μW/cm(2T1), 20.7μW/cm(2T2)and 30.5 μW/cm2(T)3 of the ultraviolet-Bradiation(UV-B,280-320nm)were used to study their effects on the growth of Cabernet Sauvignon and the winequality. The results showed that enhanced ultraviolet radiation decreased grape size, yield, and fruit coloration index; the physiochemical indexes, such as reducing sugar, titrable acid, sugar-acid ratio (A/S)and total soluble solids(TSS)were also significantly decreased (CKT1T2T3). There was no significant difference in the fermentation condition between CK and radiation groups. However, the tannin content and the colority of red wine were reduced, because of the negative effect of ultraviolet-B radiation on the grape quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B radiation decreased grape size, yield and fruit coloration index relative to the control.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
enhanced ultraviolet radiatione2
Outcome
grape size, yield, and fruit coloration indexe2
Direction
decreasede2
Comparator
CKe1
Setting
outdoor natural sunlighte1

Verbatim

e1

“On the basis of outdoor natural sunlight, four radiation intensities including 0μW/cm2(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that enhanced ultraviolet radiation decreased grape size, yield, and fruit coloration index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–387 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B radiation significantly decreased reducing sugar, titratable acid and sugar-acid ratio in grape.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
enhanced ultraviolet radiatione2
Outcome
reducing sugar, titrable acid, sugar-acid ratio (A/S)e3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
CKe3
Setting
outdoor natural sunlighte1

Verbatim

e1

“On the basis of outdoor natural sunlight, four radiation intensities including 0μW/cm2(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that enhanced ultraviolet radiation decreased grape size, yield, and fruit coloration index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–387 · show in text ↑
e3

“the physiochemical indexes, such as reducing sugar, titrable acid, sugar-acid ratio (A/S)and total soluble solids(TSS)were also significantly decreased (CKT1T2T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B radiation significantly decreased total soluble solids in grape.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
enhanced ultraviolet radiatione2
Outcome
total soluble solids(TSS)e3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
CKe3
Setting
outdoor natural sunlighte1

Verbatim

e1

“On the basis of outdoor natural sunlight, four radiation intensities including 0μW/cm2(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that enhanced ultraviolet radiation decreased grape size, yield, and fruit coloration index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–387 · show in text ↑
e3

“the physiochemical indexes, such as reducing sugar, titrable acid, sugar-acid ratio (A/S)and total soluble solids(TSS)were also significantly decreased (CKT1T2T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no significant difference in fermentation condition between the control and the UV-B radiation groups.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
radiation groupse4
Outcome
fermentation conditione4
Direction
no significant differencee4
Comparator
CKe4
Setting
outdoor natural sunlighte1

Verbatim

e1

“On the basis of outdoor natural sunlight, four radiation intensities including 0μW/cm2(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results showed that enhanced ultraviolet radiation decreased grape size, yield, and fruit coloration index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–387 · show in text ↑
e4

“There was no significant difference in the fermentation condition between CK and radiation groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tannin content and colour of red wine were reduced by UV-B radiation.

Taxon
grapee5
Treatment
ultraviolet-B radiatione5
Outcome
tannin content and the colority of red winee5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
CKe1
Setting
outdoor natural sunlighte1

Verbatim

e1

“On the basis of outdoor natural sunlight, four radiation intensities including 0μW/cm2(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e5

“the tannin content and the colority of red wine were reduced, because of the negative effect of ultraviolet-B radiation on the grape quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–801 · show in text ↑

radiation · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

radiation · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

uv · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

uv · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

uv · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.