Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Potential of Zinc Solubilizing Bacillus Strains to Improve Growth, Yield, and Quality of Maize (Zea mays)

Muhammad Zahid Mumtaz; Arif Malik; Farheen Nazli; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) deficiency in major food crops has been considered as an important factor affecting crop production and subsequently the human health.The application of Zn solubilizing bacteria could be a sustainable agronomic approach to increase the soil available Zn.The present field study was conducted at two different sites (Farmers' fields at Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan) to evaluate the biofortification potential of four Zn solubilizing Bacillus strains viz., Bacillus spp.ZM20, Bacillus aryabhattai ZM31, B. subtilis ZM63, and B. aryabhattai S10, alone as well as in different combination.Separate as well as combinations of Zn solubilizing Bacillus strains, significantly, improved the plant growth, yield and grain nutrient concentrations at both experimental sites.However, more increase in maize growth, yield and biofortified Zn and iron (Fe) concentration in grains were obtained due to co-inoculated combinations.Co-inoculation with B. aryabhattai S10 and B. subtilis ZM63 had the maximum Fe concentration (56.5 mg kg -1 ) in grains with an increase of 34% at Site-I compared to respective un-inoculated control.While the maximum increase in Zn concentration in maize grains (23% over respective uninoculated control at Site-II) was recorded due to combined use of B. aryabhattai ZM31 and B. subtilis ZM63.These results suggested that co-inoculation with Zn solubilizing Bacillus strains expressed synergistic effects to increase nutrients acquisition and to promote growth and yield of maize.It is recommended to use the consortia of B. aryabhattai ZM31 and B. subtilis ZM63 as potential bio-inoculants for Zn biofortification of maize under nutrient-deficient soil conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn solubilizing Bacillus strains, alone and in combination, significantly improved maize growth, yield and grain nutrient concentrations at both experimental sites.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
Zn solubilizing Bacillus strainse0
Interactor
Zn solubilizing Bacillus strainse0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth, yield and grain nutrient concentrationse0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
both experimental sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Separate as well as combinations of Zn solubilizing Bacillus strains, significantly, improved the plant growth, yield and grain nutrient concentrations at both experimental sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculated Bacillus combinations gave a greater increase in maize growth, yield and grain Zn and Fe concentration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
co-inoculated combinationse0
Outcome
maize growth, yield and biofortified Zn and iron (Fe) concentration in grainse0
Direction
more increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more increase in maize growth, yield and biofortified Zn and iron (Fe) concentration in grains were obtained due to co-inoculated combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation with B. aryabhattai S10 and B. subtilis ZM63 gave the maximum grain Fe concentration (56.5 mg kg -1), a 34% increase over the un-inoculated control at Site-I.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
Co-inoculation with B. aryabhattai S10 and B. subtilis ZM63e0
Interactor
B. aryabhattai S10Priestia aryabhattaie0symbiont
Second interactor
B. subtilis ZM63Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
Fe concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
56.5 mg kg -1e0
Qualifier
34%e0
Comparator
un-inoculated controle0
Setting
Site-Ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-inoculation with B. aryabhattai S10 and B. subtilis ZM63 had the maximum Fe concentration (56.5 mg kg -1 ) in grains with an increase of 34% at Site-I compared to respective un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined use of B. aryabhattai ZM31 and B. subtilis ZM63 gave the maximum increase in maize grain Zn concentration, 23% over the uninoculated control at Site-II.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
combined use of B. aryabhattai ZM31 and B. subtilis ZM63e0
Interactor
B. aryabhattai ZM31Priestia aryabhattaie0symbiont
Second interactor
B. subtilis ZM63Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0
Setting
Site-IIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum increase in Zn concentration in maize grains (23% over respective uninoculated control at Site-II) was recorded due to combined use of B. aryabhattai ZM31 and B. subtilis ZM63”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1318 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that co-inoculation with Zn solubilizing Bacillus strains had synergistic effects increasing nutrient acquisition and promoting growth and yield of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
co-inoculation with Zn solubilizing Bacillus strainse0
Outcome
nutrients acquisitione0
Qualifier
synergistic effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-inoculation with Zn solubilizing Bacillus strains expressed synergistic effects to increase nutrients acquisition and to promote growth and yield of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1505 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the B. aryabhattai ZM31 and B. subtilis ZM63 consortium as bio-inoculants for Zn biofortification of maize under nutrient-deficient soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
consortia of B. aryabhattai ZM31 and B. subtilis ZM63e0
Outcome
Zn biofortificatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is recommended to use the consortia of B. aryabhattai ZM31 and B. subtilis ZM63 as potential bio-inoculants for Zn biofortification of maize under nutrient-deficient soil conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1690 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Priestia aryabhattai · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.