Paper · 2021 · Journal of Phytopathology

Management of premature leaf fall ( Marssonina coronaria ) of apple with new generation fungicides in the North‐Western Himalayan Region of India

Santosh Watpade; Rakesh Kumar; Kallol Kumar Pramanick; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In the north‐western Himalayan region of India, premature leaf fall (PLF) caused by Marssonina coronaria is a major disease in apple orchards. Field experiments were conducted at a commercial orchard to evaluate the efficacy of new‐generation fungicides on PLF management during 2018 and 2019. Three contact fungicides (chlorothalonil, propineb and mancozeb), one systemic fungicide (difenoconazole) and four combination products (metiram +pyraclostrobin, fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin, tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole) were evaluated against an untreated control (UTC) by applying them at three times at 15‐day intervals to trees of the susceptible apple cultivar ‘Royal Delicious’. Out of all tested treatments, tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin achieved the lowest area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and the greatest yield increase. Similarly fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole also significantly reduced AUDPC and enhanced yield relative to the UTC. Taking into account the cost of the tested products, tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin offered the best benefit‐cost ratio in both years, followed by fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole. Based on these findings, the combination products tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin, fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole can all be recommended to the farmers of the north‐western Himalayan region for PLF management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin gave the lowest AUDPC among treatments.

Treatment
tebuconazole +trifloxystrobine0
Outcome
area under disease progress curve (AUDPC)e0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin achieved the lowest area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and the greatest yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin gave the greatest yield increase.

Treatment
tebuconazole +trifloxystrobine0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatest yield increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin achieved the lowest area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and the greatest yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin significantly reduced AUDPC relative to the untreated control.

Treatment
fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
UTCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole also significantly reduced AUDPC and enhanced yield relative to the UTC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin enhanced yield relative to the untreated control.

Treatment
fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
UTCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole also significantly reduced AUDPC and enhanced yield relative to the UTC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluopyram +tebuconazole significantly reduced AUDPC relative to the untreated control.

Treatment
fluopyram +tebuconazolee0
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
UTCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole also significantly reduced AUDPC and enhanced yield relative to the UTC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluopyram +tebuconazole enhanced yield relative to the untreated control.

Treatment
fluopyram +tebuconazolee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
UTCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole also significantly reduced AUDPC and enhanced yield relative to the UTC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin had the best benefit-cost ratio in both years.

Treatment
tebuconazole +trifloxystrobine0
Outcome
benefit‐cost ratioe0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin offered the best benefit‐cost ratio in both years, followed by fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin ranked second for benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
benefit‐cost ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin offered the best benefit‐cost ratio in both years, followed by fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluopyram +tebuconazole ranked third for benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
fluopyram +tebuconazolee0
Outcome
benefit‐cost ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin offered the best benefit‐cost ratio in both years, followed by fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The three combination fungicides are recommended for premature leaf fall management in the region.

Treatment
tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin, fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazolee0
Outcome
PLF managemente0
Setting
north‐western Himalayan regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination products tebuconazole +trifloxystrobin, fluxapyroxad +pyraclostrobin and fluopyram +tebuconazole can all be recommended to the farmers of the north‐western Himalayan region for PLF management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑

fluxapyroxad · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fluopyram · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.