Abstract
This study was conducted during 2019/2020 on sweet cherry trees (Prunus Avium L.) (Bing and Hardy Giant) cultivar planted at Sergaya-Al_Zabadani area of Rural Damascus, to reduce fruit drop of sweet cherry. The experiment included 4 foliar applications: T1: control, T2: GA3 (100 ppm), T3: NAA (20 ppm), T4: (100 ppm GA3 + 20 ppm NAA). Fruit set and fruit drop percentage, fruiting factor, and yield were recorded. The results showed that treatment with (100 ppm GA3 + 20 ppm NAA) recorded higher fruit set percentage (73.81% and 75.62%), and fruiting factor (48.38% and 50.04%) respectively; In addition to fruit yield (40.19 and 41.21 kg/tree) for both cultivars, compared to the control (9.13, 6.60 kg/tree). Therefore, it can be concluded that GA3 + NAA treatment reduced Sweet cherry fruit drop better than other treatments, where fruit drop percentage didn’t exceed (63.11% and 62.01%) in both cultivars (Bing and Hardy Giant) respectively, compared to the control (80.92% and 80.64%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Combined GA3 and NAA increased fruit set percentage in Bing to 73.81%.
- Taxon
- Sweet Cherry
Prunus aviumt0 - Material
- Binge1
- Treatment
- 100 ppm GA3 + 20 ppm NAAe0
- Outcome
- fruit set percentagee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 73.81%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment with (100 ppm GA3 + 20 ppm NAA) recorded higher fruit set percentage (73.81% and 75.62%)”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
e1“(Bing and Hardy Giant) cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined GA3 and NAA increased fruit set percentage in Hardy Giant to 75.62%.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- 100 ppm GA3 + 20 ppm NAAe0
- Outcome
- fruit set percentagee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 75.62%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment with (100 ppm GA3 + 20 ppm NAA) recorded higher fruit set percentage (73.81% and 75.62%)”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined GA3 and NAA increased fruiting factor in Bing to 48.38%.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Outcome
- fruiting factore0
- Value
- 48.38%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruiting factor (48.38% and 50.04%) respectively”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined GA3 and NAA increased fruiting factor in Hardy Giant to 50.04%.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Outcome
- fruiting factore0
- Value
- 50.04%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruiting factor (48.38% and 50.04%) respectively”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined GA3 and NAA produced Bing yield of 40.19 kg/tree versus 9.13 kg/tree in controls.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Value
- 40.19 and 41.21 kg/treee0
- Qualifier
- 9.13, 6.60 kg/treee0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Not reportedTreatmentDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit yield (40.19 and 41.21 kg/tree) for both cultivars, compared to the control (9.13, 6.60 kg/tree)”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined GA3 and NAA produced Hardy Giant yield of 41.21 kg/tree versus 6.60 kg/tree in controls.
- Taxon
- Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Value
- 41.21 kg/treee0
- Qualifier
- 6.60 kg/treee0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Not reportedTreatmentDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit yield (40.19 and 41.21 kg/tree) for both cultivars, compared to the control (9.13, 6.60 kg/tree)”
t0“Sweet Cherry”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment reduced Bing fruit drop to 63.11% versus 80.92% in controls.
- Taxon
- Sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Material
- Binge0
- Treatment
- GA3 + NAA treatmente0
- Outcome
- fruit drop percentagee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 63.11%e0
- Qualifier
- 80.92%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GA3 + NAA treatment reduced Sweet cherry fruit drop better than other treatments, where fruit drop percentage didn’t exceed (63.11% and 62.01%) in both cultivars (Bing and Hardy Giant) respectively, compared to the control (80.92% and 80.64%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatment reduced Hardy Giant fruit drop to 62.01% versus 80.64% in controls.
- Taxon
- Sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
- Material
- Hardy Giante0
- Treatment
- GA3 + NAA treatmente0
- Outcome
- fruit drop percentagee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 62.01%e0
- Qualifier
- 80.64%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GA3 + NAA treatment reduced Sweet cherry fruit drop better than other treatments, where fruit drop percentage didn’t exceed (63.11% and 62.01%) in both cultivars (Bing and Hardy Giant) respectively, compared to the control (80.92% and 80.64%)”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.