Abstract
To investigate the effect of foilar application of salicylic rates and yeast extracton yield and quality of wheat, in this respect the two experiments were carried out at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Alexandria Governorate, Egypt, during the two winter seasons of 2019/2020 and 2020/2021. This factorial experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications in both seasons. The first factor was salicylic acid concentrations (spray water, 150, 300 and 450 ml/l), while the second factor was yeast (water = control, 2, 4 and 6 g/l water) was in both seasons. The obtained results showed that foliar application of salicylic acid (SA) and yeast extract of wheat significantly affected yield and its component, whereas increasing of SA and yeast extract increased yield and yield component characters of wheat in both seasons. The interaction between SA and yeast was significant on all the studied characters, where planting Giza 171 with foliar application of 450 ppm SA/L and 4 and 6 g yeast/L recorded the highest ones in the two seasons under the study conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing foliar salicylic acid rates increased yield and yield components of wheat in both seasons, compared with water spray.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- salicylic acide1
- Outcome
- yield and yield component characterse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
- Comparator
- spray watere1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing of SA and yeast extract increased yield and yield component characters of wheat in both seasons”
e1“The first factor was salicylic acid concentrations (spray water, 150, 300 and 450 ml/l)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing foliar yeast extract rates increased yield and yield components of wheat in both seasons, compared with the water control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- yeast extracte0
- Outcome
- yield and yield component characterse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
- Comparator
- water = controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing of SA and yeast extract increased yield and yield component characters of wheat in both seasons”
e1“the second factor was yeast (water = control, 2, 4 and 6 g/l water)”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction between salicylic acid and yeast was significant on all the studied characters of wheat.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- interaction between SA and yeaste0
- Outcome
- all the studied characterse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between SA and yeast was significant on all the studied characters”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Giza 171 wheat sprayed with 450 ppm SA/L and 4 and 6 g yeast/L recorded the highest values in both seasons.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Giza 171e0
- Treatment
- foliar application of 450 ppm SA/L and 4 and 6 g yeast/Le0
- Outcome
- the highest onese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- in the two seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“planting Giza 171 with foliar application of 450 ppm SA/L and 4 and 6 g yeast/L recorded the highest ones in the two seasons”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
salicylic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
81 papers more in this group
See all 85 papers →botanical · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
136 papers more in this group
See all 140 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.