Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out at Etay El-Baroud Research Station, El-Beheira Governorate, Agric. Res Center in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons to evaluate three planting methods and four intercropping densities of wheat with sugar beet and their interaction. The obtained results indicated that planting sugar beet on wide ridges (120 cm width) and wheat on the wide of the same ridges (M1) significantly increased yield and its components. The intercropping densities of wheat had significant effect on most of studied traits for this crop. Decrease densities of wheat lead to the highest values of all sugar beet characters and spike length of wheat, while No. of spikes/m2, grain weight/m2 of wheat were increased by increasing intercropping densities of wheat. A monoculture crop gave the highest values of both crops. Significant interaction effect between planting methods and intercropping plant density was found on some studied characters of the two crops under testing. Planting method intercropping combination on wide sugar beet ridges 120 cm width (M1) resulted in the greatest land eqvillant ratio (LER) and gross returns. The results showed that the productivity of land increased by intercropping 12.50 % of wheat seeding rate per feddan with sugar beet gave the highest LER and gross returns. The best productivity of land was achieved by planting wheat with sugar beet on sugar beet ridges 120 cm width (M1) by using intercropping density 12.50 %.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Planting sugar beet and wheat on wide 120 cm ridges (M1) significantly increased yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- planting sugar beet on wide ridges (120 cm width) and wheat on the wide of the same ridges (M1)e0
- Outcome
- yield and its componentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“planting sugar beet on wide ridges (120 cm width) and wheat on the wide of the same ridges (M1) significantly increased yield and its components”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping densities of wheat had a significant effect on most studied traits of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- intercropping densities of wheate1
- Outcome
- most of studied traitse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The intercropping densities of wheat had significant effect on most of studied traits for this crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing wheat density gave the highest values of all sugar beet characters.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise2 - Treatment
- Decrease densities of wheate2
- Outcome
- all sugar beet characterse2
- Direction
- highest valuese2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Decrease densities of wheat lead to the highest values of all sugar beet characters and spike length of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing wheat density gave the highest spike length of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Treatment
- Decrease densities of wheate2
- Outcome
- spike lengthe2
- Direction
- highest valuese2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Decrease densities of wheat lead to the highest values of all sugar beet characters and spike length of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing intercropping density of wheat increased number of spikes per square metre and grain weight per square metre.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Treatment
- increasing intercropping densities of wheate3
- Outcome
- No. of spikes/m2, grain weight/m2e3
- Direction
- increasede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“No. of spikes/m2, grain weight/m2 of wheat were increased by increasing intercropping densities of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Monoculture gave the highest values of both wheat and sugar beet.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- A monoculture crope4
- Outcome
- values of both cropse4
- Direction
- higheste4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“planting sugar beet on wide ridges (120 cm width) and wheat on the wide of the same ridges (M1) significantly increased yield and its components”
e4“A monoculture crop gave the highest values of both crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting methods and intercropping plant density had a significant interaction effect on some studied characters of wheat and sugar beet.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- planting methods and intercropping plant densitye5
- Outcome
- some studied characters of the two cropse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“planting sugar beet on wide ridges (120 cm width) and wheat on the wide of the same ridges (M1) significantly increased yield and its components”
e5“Significant interaction effect between planting methods and intercropping plant density was found on some studied characters of the two crops under testing”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting wheat with sugar beet on wide sugar beet ridges (M1) gave the greatest land equivalent ratio and gross returns.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Planting method intercropping combination on wide sugar beet ridges 120 cm width (M1)e6
- Outcome
- land eqvillant ratio (LER) and gross returnse6
- Direction
- greateste6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“planting sugar beet on wide ridges (120 cm width) and wheat on the wide of the same ridges (M1) significantly increased yield and its components”
e6“Planting method intercropping combination on wide sugar beet ridges 120 cm width (M1) resulted in the greatest land eqvillant ratio (LER) and gross returns”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping 12.50 % of wheat seeding rate per feddan with sugar beet increased land productivity.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- intercropping 12.50 % of wheat seeding rate per feddan with sugar beete7
- Outcome
- productivity of lande7
- Direction
- increasede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“planting sugar beet on wide ridges (120 cm width) and wheat on the wide of the same ridges (M1) significantly increased yield and its components”
e7“The results showed that the productivity of land increased by intercropping 12.50 % of wheat seeding rate per feddan with sugar beet gave the highest LER and gross returns”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping 12.50 % of wheat seeding rate per feddan with sugar beet gave the highest land equivalent ratio and gross returns.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- intercropping 12.50 % of wheat seeding rate per feddan with sugar beete7
- Outcome
- LER and gross returnse7
- Direction
- higheste7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“planting sugar beet on wide ridges (120 cm width) and wheat on the wide of the same ridges (M1) significantly increased yield and its components”
e7“The results showed that the productivity of land increased by intercropping 12.50 % of wheat seeding rate per feddan with sugar beet gave the highest LER and gross returns”
The same questions in other papers
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- negative
185 papers more in this group
See all 189 papers →density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.