Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Application of the combination of Calontropis gigantea L. and Crescentia cujete L. against Schirpophaga innotata and Leptocorisa acuta Thunb. and predator in paddy plants

P A Palayukan; S Sjam; Melina; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract C. gigantea L. and C. cujete L. are plants that contain secondary metabolites that can act as insecticides. This study aimed to evaluate the implications of C. gigantea and C. cujete to reduce the population and intensity of attack by stem borer ( S. innotata ) and stink bug ( L. acuta ) which are the main pests of paddy plants. This study consisted of 4 treatments consisting of a mixture of C. gigantea and C. cujete extracts, C. gigantea extracts, C. cujete extracts, and control with 5 replications. The extract made by fermentation ant the extract was applied at the age of 1 month after planting with a concentration of 5% for 8 times with a frequency of 1 time a week. Observation parameters were population and attack intensity of S. innotata and L. acuta as well as natural enemy population. The results obtained were that the treatment of all extracts could reduce the population and intensity of attacks compared to the control. Treatment of the mixture of C. gigantea and C. cujete extracts can reduce the population and the intensity of attacks is higher than without the mixture. Predator is not affected by extract applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant extracts reduced stem borer population and attack intensity versus control.

Taxon
paddy plantst0
Treatment
all extractse0
Interactor
S. innotatae1pest
Outcome
population and intensity of attackse0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The results obtained were that the treatment of all extracts could reduce the population and intensity of attacks compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem borer ( S. innotata ) and stink bug ( L. acuta )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant extracts reduced stink bug population and attack intensity versus control.

Taxon
paddy plantst0
Treatment
all extractse0
Interactor
L. acutaLeptocorisa acutae1pest
Outcome
population and intensity of attackse0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leptocorisa acuta
Leptocorisa acuta · InteractorOwasim raja ahmed · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results obtained were that the treatment of all extracts could reduce the population and intensity of attacks compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem borer ( S. innotata ) and stink bug ( L. acuta )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed extracts reduced pest population and attack intensity more than the unmixed extracts.

Taxon
paddy plantst0
Treatment
mixture of C. gigantea and C. cujete extractse0
Outcome
population and the intensity of attackse0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
without the mixturee0

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of the mixture of C. gigantea and C. cujete extracts can reduce the population and the intensity of attacks is higher than without the mixture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem borer ( S. innotata ) and stink bug ( L. acuta )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract application did not affect predator populations.

Taxon
paddy plantst0
Treatment
extract applicationse0
Outcome
Predatore0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Predator is not affected by extract applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem borer ( S. innotata ) and stink bug ( L. acuta )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–297 · show in text ↑

Crescentia cujete · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · ecology: diversity · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 78 positive, 8 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.