Paper · 2021 · 2021 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting, July 12-16, 2021

Vibro-acoustic emission and heat stimulation effect on the detection of codling moth larvae in apples

Alfadhl Y Khaled; Chadwick A Parrish; Nader Ekramirad; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. Codling moth (CM) larva is one of the most problematic insect pest species that plague the apple industry in the United States, especially with regards to international export. As the apple industry continues to grow, there is an ever-growing need for faster and more precise non-destructive techniques for detecting insect infestations. Vibro-acoustic emission sensing has proven to be an effective method for non-invasive detection. However, internal CM larvae infestation detection in apples can be difficult because their activity pattern is not stationary, resulting in a nontrivial chance of the larvae being dormant during the sample‘s evaluation period. One solution to this is to attempt to stimulate the larvae, encouraging it to be active during a known evaluation period. Our proposed method is heat stimulation, where the apple (and larvae, if present) are placed in an environment that slightly elevates its temperature (30°C) above the room temperature for a period before data are acquired. For heat stimulation to be meaningful, the temperature must be high enough to stimulate the larvae, but low enough to where it does not cause chemical property changes in the fruit or lessen the potential usable life of the fruit. The proposed work describes an experimental study where both control and CM larvae infested apples had vibro-acoustic data collected, with and without heat stimulation. The results show that heat stimulation does increase the accuracy of detection at the longer signal time (120 s, 60 s, and 10 s). Different classifier models were applied to recognize vibro-acoustic signals from CM infested apples, and the Ensemble model illustrated the highest performance, with overall test accuracy of 96.64%. This suggests that there is merit in heat stimulation, and industrial potential as the heat stimulation applied does not appear to damage the fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stimulation increased the accuracy of detecting codling moth larvae in apples at longer signal times.

Treatment
heat stimulatione0
Interactor
codling moth larvaet0pest
Outcome
accuracy of detectione0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
at the longer signal time (120 s, 60 s, and 10 s)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat stimulation does increase the accuracy of detection at the longer signal time (120 s, 60 s, and 10 s)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vibro-acoustic emission and heat stimulation effect on the detection of codling moth larvae in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ensemble classifier reached the highest overall test accuracy of 96.64% on vibro-acoustic signals from infested apples.

Interactor
CMe1pest
Outcome
overall test accuracye1
Direction
highest performancee1
Value
96.64%e1
Comparator
Different classifier modelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Different classifier models were applied to recognize vibro-acoustic signals from CM infested apples, and the Ensemble model illustrated the highest performance, with overall test accuracy of 96.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vibro-acoustic emission and heat stimulation effect on the detection of codling moth larvae in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The heat stimulation applied does not appear to damage apple fruit.

Treatment
heat stimulatione2
Outcome
damage the fruite2
Qualifier
does not appear toe2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the heat stimulation applied does not appear to damage the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1830–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vibro-acoustic emission and heat stimulation effect on the detection of codling moth larvae in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors see merit and industrial potential in heat stimulation for apple infestation detection.

Treatment
heat stimulatione3
Outcome
merit in heat stimulatione3
Qualifier
industrial potentiale3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“This suggests that there is merit in heat stimulation, and industrial potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1826 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vibro-acoustic emission and heat stimulation effect on the detection of codling moth larvae in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑

heat · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.