Paper · 1970 · Journal of Bio-Science

Effect of Planting Method and Nitrogen Levels on the Yield and Yield Attributes of Wheat

Md Ilias Hossain; Md Khairul Islam; Md Abu Sufian; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted during the winter season of 2001-2002 to find out the effect of planting method and nitrogen levels on wheat. Effects of two planting methods viz. bed planting and conventional planting were studied on three nitrogen levels viz. 50, 100 & 150 kg /ha on wheat (var. Protiva). Planting methods exhibited significant variation in respect of all the characters studied. The maximum grain yield (3.60 t/ha) was obtained from bed planting. Different levels of nitrogen significantly influenced on yield and yield attributing parameters of wheat. The highest grain yield (3.70 t/ha) was recorded from 150 kg N per hectare. The interaction effects of planting methods and nitrogen levels showed the significant difference in respect of spike/m2, spike length and grain yield. Highest grain yield (4.04 t/ha) was obtained at bed planting using 150 kg N per hectare. Though higher rate of N are used but lodging of plant height was not noticed. The correlation analyses showed that the rate of change of grain yield was highly dependent upon the rate of change of yield contributing characters of wheat. Key words: Planting methods, Nitrogen, Wheat, Cropping system. J. bio-sci. 14: 127-130, 2006

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting methods significantly varied all measured characters.

Treatment
Planting methodse0
Outcome
all the characters studiede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting methods exhibited significant variation in respect of all the characters studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting gave maximum grain yield of 3.60 t/ha.

Treatment
bed plantinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.60 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain yield (3.60 t/ha) was obtained from bed planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen levels significantly influenced wheat yield and yield attributes.

Treatment
Different levels of nitrogene0
Outcome
yield and yield attributing parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different levels of nitrogen significantly influenced on yield and yield attributing parameters of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield was 3.70 t/ha at 150 kg N per hectare.

Treatment
150 kg N per hectaree0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.70 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (3.70 t/ha) was recorded from 150 kg N per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting method and nitrogen interactions significantly differed in spike density, spike length, and grain yield.

Treatment
planting methods and nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
spike/m2, spike length and grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effects of planting methods and nitrogen levels showed the significant difference in respect of spike/m2, spike length and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting with 150 kg N per hectare yielded 4.04 t/ha, the highest yield.

Treatment
bed planting using 150 kg N per hectaree0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
4.04 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield (4.04 t/ha) was obtained at bed planting using 150 kg N per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N rates did not produce lodging.

Treatment
higher rate of Ne0
Outcome
lodging of plant height was not noticede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Though higher rate of N are used but lodging of plant height was not noticed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield change depended strongly on changes in yield components.

Outcome
rate of change of grain yielde0
Comparator
rate of change of yield contributing characterse0

Not reportedOrgan / stageDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of change of grain yield was highly dependent upon the rate of change of yield contributing characters of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1120 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.