Abstract
Abstract Background Sweet pepper is considered one of the most important vegetable crops cultivated for local consumption and exportation. Under greenhouse conditions, the effects of different rates of yeast and compost tea on vegetative growth, leaves mineral content, fruit yield and quality were studied for two consecutive years 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 under soilless conditions. Nine treatments of compost tea (CT) and or dry yeast (DY) were applied using control (sprayed with distilled water); CT (10L/fed.); CT (20 L/fed.); DY (3 g/L); DY (6 g/L); CT (10L/fed.) + DY (3 g/L); CT (20L/fed.) + DY (3 g/L); CT (10L/fed.) + DY (6 g/L) and CT (20L/fed.) + DY (6 g/L). Results Results showed that the mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/L, respectively, had significantly increased vegetative growth, fruit physical quality (length, diameter and fresh weight), total yield, leaves mineral content (N, P and K) and fruit nutritional value content (calcium and vitamin C). The maximum return or profit comes from the CT (20 L/fed) + DY (6 g/L) followed by CT (20 L/fed) + DY (3 g/L.) Conclusion It is clear that all treatments enhanced the yield and the fruit physical parameters of the studied plants as well as all treatments are economically feasible including the control treatment. However, looking at the Revenue/Cost ratio (R/C), one can find that the maximum net revenue comes from the mixture of CT (20 L/fed) plus DY (6 g/L) with a net revenue about 192.72 L.E./m 2 and R/C ratio of 1.90, followed by CT (20 L/fed) + DY (3 g/L.).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
The compost tea and yeast mixture significantly increased vegetative growth.
- Taxon
- sweet pepper plants
Capsicum annuumt0 - Treatment
- mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/Le0
- Outcome
- vegetative growthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/L, respectively, had significantly increased vegetative growth, fruit physical quality (length, diameter and fresh weight), total yield, leaves mineral content (N, P and K) and fruit nutritional value content (calcium and vitamin C)”
t0“sweet pepper plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The compost tea and yeast mixture significantly increased fruit physical quality (length, diameter and fresh weight).
- Taxon
- sweet pepper plants
Capsicum annuumt0 - Treatment
- mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/Le0
- Outcome
- fruit physical quality (length, diameter and fresh weight)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/L, respectively, had significantly increased vegetative growth, fruit physical quality (length, diameter and fresh weight), total yield, leaves mineral content (N, P and K) and fruit nutritional value content (calcium and vitamin C)”
t0“sweet pepper plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The compost tea and yeast mixture significantly increased total yield.
- Taxon
- sweet pepper plants
Capsicum annuumt0 - Treatment
- mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/Le0
- Outcome
- total yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/L, respectively, had significantly increased vegetative growth, fruit physical quality (length, diameter and fresh weight), total yield, leaves mineral content (N, P and K) and fruit nutritional value content (calcium and vitamin C)”
t0“sweet pepper plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The compost tea and yeast mixture significantly increased leaves mineral content (N, P and K).
- Taxon
- sweet pepper plants
Capsicum annuumt0 - Treatment
- mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/Le0
- Outcome
- leaves mineral content (N, P and K)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/L, respectively, had significantly increased vegetative growth, fruit physical quality (length, diameter and fresh weight), total yield, leaves mineral content (N, P and K) and fruit nutritional value content (calcium and vitamin C)”
t0“sweet pepper plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The compost tea and yeast mixture significantly increased fruit nutritional value content (calcium and vitamin C).
- Taxon
- sweet pepper plants
Capsicum annuumt0 - Treatment
- mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/Le0
- Outcome
- fruit nutritional value content (calcium and vitamin C)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the mixture of compost tea and dry yeast at a rate of 20 L./fed. plus 6 g/L, respectively, had significantly increased vegetative growth, fruit physical quality (length, diameter and fresh weight), total yield, leaves mineral content (N, P and K) and fruit nutritional value content (calcium and vitamin C)”
t0“sweet pepper plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest profit came from CT 20 L/fed plus DY 6 g/L, followed by CT 20 L/fed plus DY 3 g/L.
- Taxon
- sweet pepper plants
Capsicum annuumt0 - Treatment
- CT (20 L/fed) + DY (6 g/L)e0
- Outcome
- return or profite0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- CT (20 L/fed) + DY (3 g/L.)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The maximum return or profit comes from the CT (20 L/fed) + DY (6 g/L) followed by CT (20 L/fed) + DY (3 g/L.)”
t0“sweet pepper plants”
Claim · model-written summary
All treatments enhanced yield and fruit physical parameters.
- Taxon
- sweet pepper plants
Capsicum annuumt0 - Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yield and the fruit physical parameterse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“all treatments enhanced the yield and the fruit physical parameters of the studied plants as well as all treatments are economically feasible including the control treatment”
t0“sweet pepper plants”
Claim · model-written summary
All treatments, including the control, were economically feasible.
- Taxon
- sweet pepper plants
Capsicum annuumt0 - Outcome
- economically feasiblee0
- Qualifier
- including the control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“all treatments enhanced the yield and the fruit physical parameters of the studied plants as well as all treatments are economically feasible including the control treatment”
t0“sweet pepper plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The CT 20 L/fed and DY 6 g/L mixture had the maximum net revenue of about 192.72 L.E./m 2.
- Taxon
- sweet pepper plants
Capsicum annuumt0 - Treatment
- mixture of CT (20 L/fed) plus DY (6 g/L)e0
- Outcome
- net revenuee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 192.72 L.E./m 2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum net revenue comes from the mixture of CT (20 L/fed) plus DY (6 g/L) with a net revenue about 192.72 L.E./m 2 and R/C ratio of 1.90, followed by CT (20 L/fed) + DY (3 g/L.)”
t0“sweet pepper plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The CT 20 L/fed and DY 6 g/L mixture had an R/C ratio of 1.90.
- Taxon
- sweet pepper plants
Capsicum annuumt0 - Treatment
- mixture of CT (20 L/fed) plus DY (6 g/L)e0
- Outcome
- R/C ratioe0
- Value
- 1.90e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“maximum net revenue comes from the mixture of CT (20 L/fed) plus DY (6 g/L) with a net revenue about 192.72 L.E./m 2 and R/C ratio of 1.90, followed by CT (20 L/fed) + DY (3 g/L.)”
t0“sweet pepper plants”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: general · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →fertilization · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
93 papers more in this group
See all 97 papers →fertilization · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.