Paper · 2021 · Maydica

Interactive effect of irrigation regimes and sowing dates on morphophysiological response, fodder yield and quality and antinutrient HCN of multi-cut sorghum in the semi-arid region

Harpreet Kaur Oberoi; Jaspal Singh; Udham Tiwana Singh Tiwana; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A two-year field experiment (2016/2017) with three moisture regimes (60 CPE (cumulative pan evaporation), 120 CPE, and no irrigation) and six sowing dates in three replications was conducted to investigate the effect of different moisture regimes and sowing dates on multi-cut hybrid fodder sorghum in the semi-arid region. Early sowing and irrigation at 60 CPE had resulted in improved morpho-physiological responses with better fodder quality in terms of higher crude protein, invitro dry matter digestibility, and lower crude fiber in both seasons. Early sowing resulted in an increase of green fodder yield (GFY) from 638.7 to 805.4 q/ha in 2016 and from 643.7 to 780.9 q/ha in 2017. Irrigation at 60 CPE showed 46% and 41% increase in GFY over no irrigation. In all three cuts, HCN content was significantly higher in the crop with no irrigation and also in late sown crop (at 2nd and 3rd cuts).HCN decreased drastically by 41% (2016) and 36% (2017) in the crop irrigated at 60 CPE (at 1st cut). Findings suggest that late sowing of the sorghum affects the fodder yield and quality due to effect on growth parameters and therefore, the adverse effects of decreased precipitation as the result of a change in weather conditions can be diminished particularly by sowing early and irrigating at 60 CPE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing and 60 CPE irrigation improved sorghum morphophysiological responses.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Early sowing and irrigation at 60 CPEe0
Outcome
morpho-physiological responsese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Early sowing and irrigation at 60 CPE had resulted in improved morpho-physiological responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing and 60 CPE irrigation increased crude protein and in vitro dry matter digestibility.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Early sowing and irrigation at 60 CPEe0
Outcome
crude protein, invitro dry matter digestibilitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Early sowing and irrigation at 60 CPE had resulted in improved morpho-physiological responses with better fodder quality in terms of higher crude protein, invitro dry matter digestibility, and lower crude fiber in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing and 60 CPE irrigation lowered crude fiber.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Early sowing and irrigation at 60 CPEe0
Outcome
crude fibere0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Early sowing and irrigation at 60 CPE had resulted in improved morpho-physiological responses with better fodder quality in terms of higher crude protein, invitro dry matter digestibility, and lower crude fiber in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing increased green fodder yield from 638.7 to 805.4 q/ha in 2016.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Early sowinge0
Outcome
green fodder yield (GFY)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
805.4 q/hae0
Qualifier
638.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Early sowing resulted in an increase of green fodder yield (GFY) from 638.7 to 805.4 q/ha in 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing increased green fodder yield from 643.7 to 780.9 q/ha in 2017.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Early sowinge0
Outcome
green fodder yield (GFY)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
780.9 q/hae0
Qualifier
643.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Early sowing resulted in an increase of green fodder yield (GFY) from 638.7 to 805.4 q/ha in 2016 and from 643.7 to 780.9 q/ha in 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 60 CPE increased green fodder yield by 46% over no irrigation.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Irrigation at 60 CPEe0
Outcome
GFYe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
46%e0
Comparator
no irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation at 60 CPE showed 46% and 41% increase in GFY over no irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 60 CPE increased green fodder yield by 41% over no irrigation.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Irrigation at 60 CPEe0
Outcome
GFYe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
41%e0
Comparator
no irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation at 60 CPE showed 46% and 41% increase in GFY over no irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–761 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HCN content was significantly higher without irrigation across all three cuts.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
no irrigatione0
Outcome
HCN contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“In all three cuts, HCN content was significantly higher in the crop with no irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–849 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HCN content was significantly higher in late sown sorghum at second and third cuts.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
late sown crope0
Outcome
HCN contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at 2nd and 3rd cutse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“HCN content was significantly higher in the crop with no irrigation and also in late sown crop (at 2nd and 3rd cuts)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 60 CPE reduced first-cut HCN by 41% in 2016.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
irrigated at 60 CPEe0
Outcome
HCNe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
41%e0
Qualifier
2016e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“HCN decreased drastically by 41% (2016) and 36% (2017) in the crop irrigated at 60 CPE (at 1st cut)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 60 CPE reduced first-cut HCN by 36% in 2017.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
irrigated at 60 CPEe0
Outcome
HCNe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
36%e0
Qualifier
2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“HCN decreased drastically by 41% (2016) and 36% (2017) in the crop irrigated at 60 CPE (at 1st cut)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–998 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise early sowing and irrigation at 60 CPE to mitigate adverse precipitation effects on sorghum fodder.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
sowing early and irrigating at 60 CPEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“multi-cut sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–157 · show in text ↑
e0

“adverse effects of decreased precipitation as the result of a change in weather conditions can be diminished particularly by sowing early and irrigating at 60 CPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1302 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sowing time · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

sowing time · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

71 papers: 50 positive, 21 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

irrigation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

131 papers: 94 positive, 37 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.