Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of additive intercropping with peanut and organic-silicate-biofertilizer combinations on growth and yield of shallots

W Wangiyana; I K Ngawit; N Farida; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Allium crops including shallot have been reported to have a high dependency on symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and have a high requirement for fertilizers. This study aimed to examine the effects of additively intercropping shallot with peanut and application of different combinations of organic-silicate-mycorrhiza-bio-fertilizer on growth and yield of several varieties of shallots. The field experiment for this study was designed according to Split Split-Plot design, with three blocks and three treatment factors, namely additive intercropping as the main plots (T0 = without; T1 = with shallot-peanut intercropping), shallot varieties as the subplots (V1 = Bima Brebes; V2 = Ketamonca; V3 = Super Philip), and fertilizer combinations as the sub-subplots (P1 = NPKS fertilizer only; P2 = NPKS+organic+silicate; P3 = NPKS+organic+silicate+mycorrhiza bio-fertilizer). Results indicated that among the treatment factors, fertilizer combination showed the most significant effects on growth and yield of shallot, and both fertilizer combinations containing silicate and organic fertilizer (P2 and P3) significantly increased yield of shallot, especially the P3 fertilizer combination, which contained mycorrhiza bio-fertilizer. Although intercropping with peanut showed no significant effects on all observation variables, there was a significant three-way interaction effect on shallot yield, which indicated different responses between varieties to intercropping and fertilizer combinations, in which yield of Ketamonca (V2) was not affected by intercropping but yield of Bima Brebes (V1) was reduced by intercropping, whereas yield of Super Philip (V3) was increased by intercropping it with peanut, especially under fertilizer combination containing mycorrhiza bio-fertilizer (P3).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer combination had the most significant effects on shallot growth and yield.

Treatment
fertilizer combinatione0
Outcome
growth and yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer combination showed the most significant effects on growth and yield of shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P2 significantly increased shallot yield.

Treatment
P2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both fertilizer combinations containing silicate and organic fertilizer (P2 and P3) significantly increased yield of shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 significantly increased shallot yield.

Treatment
P3e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both fertilizer combinations containing silicate and organic fertilizer (P2 and P3) significantly increased yield of shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut intercropping had no significant effect on observed variables overall.

Treatment
intercropping with peanute0
Outcome
observation variablese0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with peanut showed no significant effects on all observation variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1351 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A significant three-way interaction affected shallot yield.

Treatment
three-way interactione0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a significant three-way interaction effect on shallot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ketamonca yield was unaffected by intercropping.

Material
Ketamoncae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield of Ketamonca (V2) was not affected by intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bima Brebes yield decreased under intercropping.

Material
Bima Brebese0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield of Bima Brebes (V1) was reduced by intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super Philip yield increased under peanut intercropping, especially with P3.

Material
Super Philipe0
Treatment
intercropping it with peanute0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
especially under fertilizer combination containing mycorrhiza bio-fertilizer (P3)e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield of Super Philip (V3) was increased by intercropping it with peanut, especially under fertilizer combination containing mycorrhiza bio-fertilizer (P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1814 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 17 positive, 12 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.