Paper · 2020 · DINAMIKA PERTANIAN

PENGARUH PEMBERIAN PUPUK KASCING DAN NPK MUTIARA 16:16:16 TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN DAN HASIL OKRA (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moenc.) SERTA BAWANG MERAH (Allium ascalonicum L.) DENGAN SISTEM TUMPANG SARI

Wahyu Hidayatullah; T. Rosmawaty; M. Nur

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to examine the interactions between kascing fertilizers and mutiara NPK 16:16:16 on the growth and production of okra and shallots in the intercropping system. This research used a completely randomized factorial design, consisting of two factors. The first factor was the application of vermicompost (K), consisting of 4 levels, namely 0, 750, 1500 and 2250 g/plot and the second factor was NPK 16:16: 16 (N), consisting of 4 levels, namely 0, 15, 30 and 45 g/plot, so that obtained 16 treatment combinations with 3 replications and 48 experimental units. Each unit consisted of 4 plants per plot and 2 plants are samples, so that the plant had 192 plants for okra plants and 5 plots for shallots and 2 plants was become samples with total plants of 240. Based on research results indicated that intercropping system on okra plants and shallots resulted smaller plant growth and production compared to monocultures. The interaction of kascing fertilizer and NPK 16:16:16 fertilizer had no significant on all observed parameters. The main effect of the dose of kascing fertilizer was a significance on all observed parameters. The best treatment was significant on a dose of kascing fertilizer of 2250 g/plot. The main effect of the 16:16:16 NPK dose was significant on all observed parameters. The best treatment was found on NPK 16:16:16 with dose of 45 g/plot. Keywords: Kascing, Mutiara 16:16:16, Okra, Onion

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced okra growth and production relative to monoculture.

Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
plant growth and productione0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping system on okra plants and shallots resulted smaller plant growth and production compared to monocultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced shallot growth and production relative to monoculture.

Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
plant growth and productione0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping system on okra plants and shallots resulted smaller plant growth and production compared to monocultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–954 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost and NPK did not interact significantly.

Treatment
kascing fertilizer and NPK 16:16:16 fertilizere0
Outcome
all observed parameterse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“interaction of kascing fertilizer and NPK 16:16:16 fertilizer had no significant on all observed parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1067 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Kascing fertilizer dose significantly affected observed parameters.

Treatment
dose of kascing fertilizere0
Outcome
all observed parameterse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“main effect of the dose of kascing fertilizer was a significance on all observed parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1164 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The best kascing dose was 2250 g/plot.

Treatment
kascing fertilizer of 2250 g/plote0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“best treatment was significant on a dose of kascing fertilizer of 2250 g/plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1247 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK dose significantly affected observed parameters.

Treatment
16:16:16 NPK dosee0
Outcome
all observed parameterse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“main effect of the 16:16:16 NPK dose was significant on all observed parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1332 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best NPK dose was 45 g/plot.

Treatment
NPK 16:16:16 with dose of 45 g/plote0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“best treatment was found on NPK 16:16:16 with dose of 45 g/plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1401 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 17 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

intercropping · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 25 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.