Paper · 2021 · Foods

Carbon Dioxide Pretreatment and Cold Storage Synergistically Delay Tomato Ripening through Transcriptional Change in Ethylene-Related Genes and Respiration-Related Metabolism

Me-Hea Park; Sun-Ju Kim; Jung-Soo Lee; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effects of CO2 pretreatment before cold storage on tomato quality were investigated using physicochemical and transcriptome changes. Harvested tomatoes were treated with 30% or 60% CO2 for 3 h before storage at 4 °C for 14 d (cold storage), followed by transfer to 20 °C for 8 d (ambient conditions). The CO2-treated fruits were firmer with a better appearance than untreated fruits, even after being transferred from 4 °C storage to 20 °C for 8 d. CO2 pretreatment coupled with cold storage synergistically delayed tomato ripening by reducing respiration and lowering lycopene production. The tomatoes treated with 30% and 60% CO2 had fewer pits than untreated fruits after cold storage, even after being transferred to ambient conditions. Moreover, the 60% CO2 treatment significantly suppressed the decay rate. Transcriptome and metabolome functional enrichment analyses commonly showed the involvement of CO2-responsive genes or metabolites in sucrose and starch metabolism, as well as biosynthesis of secondary metabolites—in particular, glycolysis reduction. The most frequently detected domain was the ethylene-responsive factor. These results indicate that altered ethylene biosynthesis and ethylene signaling, via ethylene-responsive transcription factors and respiration-related pathways, appear to control CO2-induced fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2-treated tomatoes remained firmer and had better appearance than untreated fruit after cold storage and transfer to ambient temperature.

Treatment
CO2-treatede0
Outcome
firmer with a better appearancee0
Direction
firmere0
Qualifier
after being transferred from 4 °C storage to 20 °C for 8 de0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CO2-treated fruits were firmer with a better appearance than untreated fruits, even after being transferred from 4 °C storage to 20 °C for 8 d.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 pretreatment with cold storage delayed tomato ripening.

Treatment
CO2 pretreatment coupled with cold storagee0
Outcome
tomato ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 pretreatment coupled with cold storage synergistically delayed tomato ripening by reducing respiration and lowering lycopene production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 pretreatment with cold storage reduced tomato respiration.

Treatment
CO2 pretreatment coupled with cold storagee0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 pretreatment coupled with cold storage synergistically delayed tomato ripening by reducing respiration and lowering lycopene production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 pretreatment with cold storage lowered tomato lycopene production.

Treatment
CO2 pretreatment coupled with cold storagee0
Outcome
lycopene productione0
Direction
loweringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 pretreatment coupled with cold storage synergistically delayed tomato ripening by reducing respiration and lowering lycopene production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both 30% and 60% CO2 pretreatments produced fewer pits than untreated tomato fruit after storage.

Treatment
30% and 60% CO2e0
Outcome
pitse0
Direction
fewere0
Qualifier
after cold storage, even after being transferred to ambient conditionse0
Comparator
untreated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tomatoes treated with 30% and 60% CO2 had fewer pits than untreated fruits after cold storage, even after being transferred to ambient conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60% CO2 treatment significantly suppressed tomato decay rate.

Treatment
60% CO2 treatmente0
Outcome
decay ratee0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 60% CO2 treatment significantly suppressed the decay rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Functional enrichment implicated CO2-responsive genes or metabolites in sucrose and starch metabolism and secondary metabolite biosynthesis.

Outcome
involvement of CO2-responsive genes or metabolites in sucrose and starch metabolism, as well as biosynthesis of secondary metabolitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transcriptome and metabolome functional enrichment analyses commonly showed the involvement of CO2-responsive genes or metabolites in sucrose and starch metabolism, as well as biosynthesis of secondary metabolites—in particular, glycolysis reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Functional enrichment indicated a reduction in glycolysis under CO2 treatment.

Outcome
glycolysis reductione0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in particular, glycolysis reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ethylene-responsive factor was the most frequently detected domain.

Gene
ethylene-responsive factore0
Outcome
most frequently detected domaine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most frequently detected domain was the ethylene-responsive factor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose altered ethylene biosynthesis, signaling and respiration-related pathways as controls of CO2-induced fruit quality.

Gene
ethylene-responsive transcription factorse0
Outcome
CO2-induced fruit qualitye0
Qualifier
respiration-related pathwayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“altered ethylene biosynthesis and ethylene signaling, via ethylene-responsive transcription factors and respiration-related pathways, appear to control CO2-induced fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑

co2 · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

cold · physiology: respiration · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

co2 · physiology: respiration · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

co2 · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

co2 · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

cold · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 11 positive, 7 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

cold · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 17 positive, 8 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.