Paper · 2011 · PLoS ONE

Elevated CO2 Influences Nematode-Induced Defense Responses of Tomato Genotypes Differing in the JA Pathway

Yucheng Sun; Jin Yin; Haifeng Cao; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
62
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rising atmospheric CO(2) concentrations can affect the induced defense of plants against chewing herbivores but little is known about whether elevated CO(2) can change the induced defense of plants against parasitic nematodes. This study examined the interactions between the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and three isogenic tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) genotypes grown under ambient (390 ppm) and elevated (750 ppm) CO(2) in growth chambers. In a previous study with open-top chambers in the field, we reported that elevated CO(2) increased the number of nematode-induced root galls in a JA-defense-dominated genotype but not in a wild-type or JA-defense-recessive genotype. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that elevated CO(2) will favor the salicylic acid (SA)-pathway defense but repress the jasmonic acid (JA)-pathway defense of plants against plant-parasitic nematodes. Our data showed that elevated CO(2) reduced the JA-pathway defense against M. incognita in the wild-type and in a genotype in which defense is dominated by the JA pathway (a JA-defense-dominated genotype) but up-regulated the SA-pathway defense in the wild type and in a JA-defense-recessive genotype (jasmonate-deficient mutant). Our results suggest that, in terms of defense genes, secondary metabolites, and volatile organic compounds, induced defense of nematode-infected plants could be affected by elevated CO(2), and that CO(2)-induced changes of plant resistance may lead to genotype-specific responses of plants to nematodes under elevated CO(2). The changes in resistance against nematodes, however, were small relative to those reported for chewing insects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide reduced JA-pathway defense against M. incognita in wild-type tomato.

Material
wild-typee0
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
JA-pathway defense against M. incognitae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“elevated CO(2) reduced the JA-pathway defense against M. incognita in the wild-type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide reduced JA-pathway defense against M. incognita in the JA-defense-dominated genotype.

Material
JA-defense-dominated genotypee0
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
JA-pathway defense against M. incognitae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“elevated CO(2) reduced the JA-pathway defense against M. incognita in the wild-type and in a genotype in which defense is dominated by the JA pathway (a JA-defense-dominated genotype)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide up-regulated SA-pathway defense in wild-type tomato.

Material
wild typee0
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e1
Outcome
SA-pathway defensee0
Direction
up-regulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“up-regulated the SA-pathway defense in the wild type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1166 · show in text ↑
e1

“elevated CO(2) reduced the JA-pathway defense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide up-regulated SA-pathway defense in the JA-defense-recessive genotype.

Material
JA-defense-recessive genotypee0
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e1
Outcome
SA-pathway defensee0
Direction
up-regulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“up-regulated the SA-pathway defense in the wild type and in a JA-defense-recessive genotype (jasmonate-deficient mutant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“elevated CO(2) reduced the JA-pathway defense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–971 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpreted elevated carbon dioxide effects on nematode resistance as genotype specific and relatively small compared with chewing insect effects.

Outcome
changes in resistance against nematodese1
Qualifier
small relative to those reported for chewing insectse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO(2)-induced changes of plant resistance may lead to genotype-specific responses of plants to nematodes under elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1559 · show in text ↑
e1

“changes in resistance against nematodes, however, were small relative to those reported for chewing insects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1672 · show in text ↑

co2 · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

co2 · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.