Paper · 2013 · Ethiopian Journal of Biological Sciences

Growth, light interception, radiation use efficiency and productivity of mungbean [ Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] (Fabaceae) cultivars as influenced by sowing date

Fanuel Laekemariam; Walelign Worku

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of sowing date on growth, light interception, radiation use efficiency and productivity of mungbean cultivars. The experiment comprised four sowing dates at ten days interval, viz. 08, 18, 28 July and 07 August 2006 and twocultivars, viz. Gofa local and MH-97-6. A randomized complete block design with three replications was used. Early sown plants on 8 th of July hadextended duration to attain physiological maturity, larger leaf area index (LAI) and greater dry matter accumulation. Moreover, early sown plantsexceeded in amount of light interception, radiation use efficiency (RUE) and grain yield compared to the late sown ones. The RUE values were 1.74, 1.38, 1.28 and 1.10 g DM MJ -1 for the first, second, third and fourth sowing dates, respectively. The decline in yield of last sown mungbean compared to first sowing was about 2% per day of delayed sowing. Cultivar MH-97-6 exceeded Gofa local in LAI and total dry matter. However, their differences in cumulative intercepted PAR, RUE and grain yield were not statistically significant. Grain yield was significantly correlated with growth period moisture (r=0.95), cumulative intercepted light (r=0.98), RUE (r=0.96) and LAI (r=0.82). Early July sowing gave superior performance among tested sowing dates of the main cropping season (meher). However, owing to the crop’s short growth duration, it is worthwhile to do further research by including other sowing dates of the short rainy season (belg).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early July sowing prolonged time to physiological maturity and increased leaf area index and dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
8 th of Julye0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI) and greater dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early sown plants on 8 th of July hadextended duration to attain physiological maturity, larger leaf area index (LAI) and greater dry matter accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing improved light interception, radiation use efficiency, and grain yield over late sowing.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
early sown plantse0
Outcome
light interception, radiation use efficiency (RUE) and grain yielde0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
late sown onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, early sown plantsexceeded in amount of light interception, radiation use efficiency (RUE) and grain yield compared to the late sown ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation use efficiency declined across the four successive sowing dates.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
RUE valuese0
Value
1.74, 1.38, 1.28 and 1.10 g DM MJ -1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RUE values were 1.74, 1.38, 1.28 and 1.10 g DM MJ -1 for the first, second, third and fourth sowing dates, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Last-sown mungbean yield declined about 2% per day of delayed sowing relative to first sowing.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
last sown mungbeane0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
declinee0
Value
2% per daye0
Comparator
first sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decline in yield of last sown mungbean compared to first sowing was about 2% per day of delayed sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–921 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MH-97-6 exceeded Gofa local in leaf area index and total dry matter.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Material
MH-97-6e0
Outcome
LAI and total dry mattere0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
Gofa locale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar MH-97-6 exceeded Gofa local in LAI and total dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivars did not differ significantly in intercepted PAR, radiation use efficiency, or grain yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
cumulative intercepted PAR, RUE and grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, their differences in cumulative intercepted PAR, RUE and grain yield were not statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated significantly with growth-period moisture.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
growth period moisturee0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
correlatede0
Value
r=0.95e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly correlated with growth period moisture (r=0.95), cumulative intercepted light (r=0.98), RUE (r=0.96) and LAI (r=0.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated significantly with cumulative intercepted light.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
cumulative intercepted lighte0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
correlatede0
Value
r=0.98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly correlated with growth period moisture (r=0.95), cumulative intercepted light (r=0.98), RUE (r=0.96) and LAI (r=0.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated significantly with radiation use efficiency.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
RUEe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
correlatede0
Value
r=0.96e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly correlated with growth period moisture (r=0.95), cumulative intercepted light (r=0.98), RUE (r=0.96) and LAI (r=0.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated significantly with leaf area index.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
LAIe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
correlatede0
Value
r=0.82e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly correlated with growth period moisture (r=0.95), cumulative intercepted light (r=0.98), RUE (r=0.96) and LAI (r=0.82).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early July sowing gave the best performance of tested main-season sowing dates.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
Early July sowinge0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early July sowing gave superior performance among tested sowing dates of the main cropping season (meher).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 · show in text ↑

sowing time · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.