Paper · 2003 · Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao

Effect of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on yield of peanut and sweet potato

Liu Run; Han Yi; Li Xiao

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi Glomus versiforme Berch and mixed inocula [Glomus mosseae Nicolson and Gedermann + Sclerocystis sinuosa (Gerd.Bakshi) Almeida and Schenck] on growth and yield of peanut and sweet potato were investigated under field conditions.Results show that AM fungi can improve health status of peanut seedlings and the number of fruits per plant,increase 21.3% of yield per hectare compared to the control.However the growth and yield of sweet potato are not increased,and its plant length and weight of stem with leaves are reduced by the inoculation with Glomus versiforme,while the vegetation growth and the numbers of fruits per plant are significantly enhanced by inoculation with the mixed inocula of AM fungi,and the yields per plant and per hectare are 1.6 and 1.4 times respectively greater than those of the control.It is suggested that the different species of AM fungi should be used for various crops when applied in field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi improved health status of peanut seedlings and the number of fruits per plant

Treatment
AM fungie1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
Outcome
health status of peanut seedlings and the number of fruits per plante1
Direction
improvee1
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of peanut and sweet potato were investigated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–270 · show in text ↑
e1

“AM fungi can improve health status of peanut seedlings and the number of fruits per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi increased peanut yield per hectare by 21.3% compared with the control

Treatment
AM fungie1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
Outcome
yield per hectaree2
Direction
increasee2
Value
21.3%e2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of peanut and sweet potato were investigated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–270 · show in text ↑
e1

“AM fungi can improve health status of peanut seedlings and the number of fruits per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–378 · show in text ↑
e2

“increase 21.3% of yield per hectare compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi did not increase growth or yield of sweet potato

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
AM fungie2
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae2symbiont
Outcome
growth and yield of sweet potatoe1
Direction
not increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of peanut and sweet potato were investigated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–270 · show in text ↑
e1

“However the growth and yield of sweet potato are not increased,and its plant length and weight of stem with leaves are reduced by the inoculation with Glomus versiforme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–607 · show in text ↑
e2

“AM fungi can improve health status of peanut seedlings and the number of fruits per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Glomus versiforme reduced plant length and stem-with-leaves weight of sweet potato

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inoculation with Glomus versiformee1
Interactor
Glomus versiformeDiversispora versiformise1symbiont
Outcome
plant length and weight of stem with leavese1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of peanut and sweet potato were investigated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–270 · show in text ↑
e1

“However the growth and yield of sweet potato are not increased,and its plant length and weight of stem with leaves are reduced by the inoculation with Glomus versiforme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed AM fungi inocula significantly enhanced vegetation growth and fruit numbers per plant of sweet potato

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inoculation with the mixed inocula of AM fungie1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
Outcome
vegetation growth and the numbers of fruits per plante1
Direction
significantly enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of peanut and sweet potato were investigated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–270 · show in text ↑
e1

“while the vegetation growth and the numbers of fruits per plant are significantly enhanced by inoculation with the mixed inocula of AM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed AM fungi inocula gave sweet potato yields per plant 1.6 times those of the control

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
mixed inocula of AM fungie1
Outcome
yields per plante2
Direction
greatere2
Value
1.6e2
Qualifier
times respectivelye2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of peanut and sweet potato were investigated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–270 · show in text ↑
e1

“while the vegetation growth and the numbers of fruits per plant are significantly enhanced by inoculation with the mixed inocula of AM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–748 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yields per plant and per hectare are 1.6 and 1.4 times respectively greater than those of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed AM fungi inocula gave sweet potato yield per hectare 1.4 times that of the control

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
mixed inocula of AM fungie1
Outcome
yields per plant and per hectaree2
Direction
greatere2
Value
1.4e2
Qualifier
times respectivelye2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of peanut and sweet potato were investigated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–270 · show in text ↑
e1

“while the vegetation growth and the numbers of fruits per plant are significantly enhanced by inoculation with the mixed inocula of AM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–748 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yields per plant and per hectare are 1.6 and 1.4 times respectively greater than those of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–858 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Different AM fungi species should be used for various crops when applied in the field

Taxon
various cropse3
Outcome
different species of AM fungi should be usede3

Verbatim

e3

“It is suggested that the different species of AM fungi should be used for various crops when applied in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–968 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.