Abstract
Effective cover crop termination by roller crimping remains a challenge in organic no-till systems. Slow decomposition of surface residues can delay planting and lead to competition for soil resources. Little research has investigated the potential for application of microbial inoculants to promote residue decomposition and accelerate C and N cycling. Two field studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculants on cover crop residue decomposition, labile soil carbon (POXC) and inorganic N pools, and sweet potato yield under contrasting environmental conditions. In a fall termination study, vermicompost tea, a microbial inoculant (EM-1), and thermophilic compost tea were applied after roller crimping sorghum-sudangrass. In a spring termination study, vermicompost tea, EM-1, and a treatment with tillage were applied after roller crimping a multispecies cover crop mixture. Results indicate there was no effect of the microbial tea treatments on the rate of residue decomposition or soil inorganic N and POXC concentrations in either study. However, soil ammonium-N and nitrate-N concentrations were significantly higher in the tilled vs. roller crimped treatments in the spring termination study. Moreover, POXC increased significantly over time in the fall termination study but decreased in the spring termination study. There were no differences in sweet potato yield among microbial inoculants or between the roller crimped and tilled treatments. These results provide insights into the limitations of promoting cover crop decomposition following roller crimping in organic no-till systems to enhance labile C and inorganic N pools while improving yield of the succeeding cash crop. • Residue decomposition of a roller-crimped cover crop was studied under field conditions. • Application of microbial inoculants onto surface residues had no effect on decomposition rate. • Cover crop residues released greater inorganic N under tilled conditions. • Increases in labile C were only observed following roller crimping of the summer cover crop. • Surface residues had no effect on yield of the subsequent sweet potato crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Microbial tea treatments had no effect on cover crop residue decomposition rate, soil inorganic N or POXC.
- Taxon
- cover crope1
- Treatment
- microbial tea treatmentse2
- Outcome
- rate of residue decomposition or soil inorganic N and POXC concentrationse2
- Direction
- no effecte2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“Two field studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculants on cover crop residue decomposition”
e2“Results indicate there was no effect of the microbial tea treatments on the rate of residue decomposition or soil inorganic N and POXC concentrations in either study”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil ammonium-N and nitrate-N were significantly higher under tillage than after roller crimping in the spring termination study.
Verbatim
e1“Two field studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculants on cover crop residue decomposition”
e3“However, soil ammonium-N and nitrate-N concentrations were significantly higher in the tilled vs. roller crimped treatments in the spring termination study”
Claim · model-written summary
POXC increased over time in the fall termination study.
Verbatim
e1“Two field studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculants on cover crop residue decomposition”
e4“Moreover, POXC increased significantly over time in the fall termination study but decreased in the spring termination study”
Claim · model-written summary
POXC decreased over time in the spring termination study.
Verbatim
e1“Two field studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of microbial inoculants on cover crop residue decomposition”
e4“Moreover, POXC increased significantly over time in the fall termination study but decreased in the spring termination study”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbial inoculants had no effect on sweet potato yield.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
_Flower.jpg?width=60)
Ipomoea batatase5 - Treatment
- microbial inoculantse5
- Outcome
- sweet potato yielde5
- Direction
- no differencese5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e5“There were no differences in sweet potato yield among microbial inoculants or between the roller crimped and tilled treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Roller crimping and tillage gave no difference in sweet potato yield.
- Taxon
- sweet potatoIpomoea batatase5
- Treatment
- roller crimpede5
- Outcome
- sweet potato yielde5
- Direction
- no differencese5
- Comparator
- tilled treatmentse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“There were no differences in sweet potato yield among microbial inoculants or between the roller crimped and tilled treatments”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.