Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Development of the PGPR and Cyanobacteria Consortium for Growth Promotion and Control Ralstonia syzigii subsp. indonesiensis of Tomato

Yulmira Yanti; Hasmiandy Hamid; Reflin

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are known in various cropping systems to increase plant growth, vigour and plant nutrient contents. cyanobacteria are known to possess the ability to form associations with vascular/non-vascular plants and produce growth-promoting substances. The present work was undertaken to formulate the best effective consortium consist of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium and cyanobacteria to promote growth rate of tomato and control R. syzigii subsp. indonesiensis. Our previous study had screened 7 best rhizobacteria (Bacillus thuringiensis strain RBI 2AB1.1, Bacillus cereus strain HYM 88 RBI 2AB 2.1, Bacillus cereus strain APSB-03 RBI 2AB 2.2, Bacterium JP60 RBI 2 AB 2.3, Bacillus sp. M6 RBI KDA 1.2, Bacillus cereus strain JN23 RBI KDA 2.2 and Bacillus subtilis BSn5 RBI IPBL 2.3) and 4 cyanobacteria strain (RZ2AB2.1, RZ1AB2.3, RZ1BPL2.3, RZSD1.1) to promote growth of tomato. To increase those strains’ ability both for suppress pathogen attack and promote growth, development of suitable consortium is necessary. Our research consists of two phase which were in vitro dual culture studies for interaction assay, and in planta consortium assay. Results shown that almost all strains were had a good compatibility to growth together. We develop 12 consortiums based on its previous ability and the compatibility. All consortiums shown capability to reduce bacterial wilt disease development and also promote growth of tomato. Consortium consist of Bacillus thuringiensis strain RBI 2AB1.1, Bacillus cereus strain APSB-03 RBI 2AB 2.2, Bacillus subtilis BSn5 RBI IPBL 2.3 and cyanobacteria RZ2AB2.1) shown best ability to reduce disease development and promote growth and yields of tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Almost all microbial strains were compatible in dual culture.

Outcome
good compatibility to growth togethere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“almost all strains were had a good compatibility to growth together”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–134 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve consortia were developed from prior ability and compatibility.

Outcome
12 consortiumse0
Value
12 consortiumse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We develop 12 consortiums based on its previous ability and the compatibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All consortia reduced bacterial wilt disease development in tomato.

Treatment
All consortiumse0
Interactor
bacterial wilte0pathogen
Outcome
bacterial wilt disease developmente0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All consortiums shown capability to reduce bacterial wilt disease development and also promote growth of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All consortia promoted tomato growth.

Treatment
All consortiumse0
Outcome
growth of tomatoe0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All consortiums shown capability to reduce bacterial wilt disease development and also promote growth of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named four-member consortium was best at reducing disease development.

Treatment
Consortium consist of Bacillus thuringiensis strain RBI 2AB1.1, Bacillus cereus strain APSB-03 RBI 2AB 2.2, Bacillus subtilis BSn5 RBI IPBL 2.3 and cyanobacteria RZ2AB2.1e0
Outcome
disease developmente0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consortium consist of Bacillus thuringiensis strain RBI 2AB1.1, Bacillus cereus strain APSB-03 RBI 2AB 2.2, Bacillus subtilis BSn5 RBI IPBL 2.3 and cyanobacteria RZ2AB2.1) shown best ability to reduce disease development and promote growth and yields of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named four-member consortium was best at promoting tomato growth and yields.

Treatment
Consortium consist of Bacillus thuringiensis strain RBI 2AB1.1, Bacillus cereus strain APSB-03 RBI 2AB 2.2, Bacillus subtilis BSn5 RBI IPBL 2.3 and cyanobacteria RZ2AB2.1e0
Outcome
growth and yields of tomatoe0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consortium consist of Bacillus thuringiensis strain RBI 2AB1.1, Bacillus cereus strain APSB-03 RBI 2AB 2.2, Bacillus subtilis BSn5 RBI IPBL 2.3 and cyanobacteria RZ2AB2.1) shown best ability to reduce disease development and promote growth and yields of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1744 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Bacillus cereus · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Bacillus thuringiensis · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Bacillus thuringiensis · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Bacillus cereus · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.