Paper · 2013 · European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology

Bacillus thuringiensis strain199 can induce systemic resistance in tomato againstFusariumwilt

Waheed Akram; Asrar Mahboob; Asmat Ali Javed

7
claims
22
verbatim quotes
53
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The research work was performed to investigate the potential of Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199 to induce systemic resistance in tomato against Fusarium wilt. Roots of two-week-old seedlings of tomato plants were primed with bacterial strain. After 10 days of transplantation, some pots of tomato seedlings were provided with inoculum of Fusarium oxysporum lycopersici according to experimental design to induce disease. After 15 days of incubation period, plants challenged with F. oxysporum lycopersici alone were having obvious symptoms of Fusarium wilt. Plants that were treated with B. thuringiensis 199 + F. oxysporum lycopersici were having significant reduction of disease severity. Quantity of total phenolics increased 1.7-fold in bacterial-treated plants as compared to nontreated. Likewise, in case of defense-related enzymes, a significant increase of 1.3-, 1.8-, and 1.4-fold in polyphenol oxidase (PPO), phenyl ammonia lyase (PAL), and peroxidase (PO) was observed in comparison with untreated control. These results, hence, prove the potential of this bacterial strain for use as plant protection agent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plants challenged only with Fusarium developed obvious wilt symptoms.

Treatment
challenged with F. oxysporum lycopersici alonee0
Interactor
F. oxysporum lycopersiciFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
obvious symptoms of Fusarium wilte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants challenged with F. oxysporum lycopersici alone were having obvious symptoms of Fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment reduced Fusarium wilt severity in tomato plants challenged with the pathogen.

Treatment
treated with B. thuringiensis 199 + F. oxysporum lycopersicie0
Interactor
F. oxysporum lycopersiciFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Second interactor
B. thuringiensis 199Bacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants that were treated with B. thuringiensis 199 + F. oxysporum lycopersici were having significant reduction of disease severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–692 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment increased total phenolics 1.7-fold over untreated plants.

Treatment
bacterial-treatede0
Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199Bacillus thuringiensise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Quantity of total phenolicse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.7-folde0
Comparator
nontreatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quantity of total phenolics increased 1.7-fold in bacterial-treated plants as compared to nontreated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment increased polyphenol oxidase activity 1.3-fold relative to untreated controls.

Treatment
bacterial-treatede3
Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199Bacillus thuringiensise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
polyphenol oxidase (PPO)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.3-e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase of 1.3-, 1.8-, and 1.4-fold in polyphenol oxidase (PPO), phenyl ammonia lyase (PAL), and peroxidase (PO) was observed in comparison with untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“bacterial-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment increased phenyl ammonia lyase activity 1.8-fold relative to untreated controls.

Treatment
bacterial-treatede3
Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199Bacillus thuringiensise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
phenyl ammonia lyase (PAL)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.8-e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase of 1.3-, 1.8-, and 1.4-fold in polyphenol oxidase (PPO), phenyl ammonia lyase (PAL), and peroxidase (PO) was observed in comparison with untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“bacterial-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment increased peroxidase activity 1.4-fold relative to untreated controls.

Treatment
bacterial-treatede3
Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199Bacillus thuringiensise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
peroxidase (PO)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.4-folde0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase of 1.3-, 1.8-, and 1.4-fold in polyphenol oxidase (PPO), phenyl ammonia lyase (PAL), and peroxidase (PO) was observed in comparison with untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“bacterial-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–767 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose Bacillus thuringiensis 199 as a plant protection agent.

Interactor
Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199Bacillus thuringiensise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
use as plant protection agente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results, hence, prove the potential of this bacterial strain for use as plant protection agent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1121 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus thuringiensis strain 199”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–97 · show in text ↑

Fusarium oxysporum · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Bacillus thuringiensis · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.