Paper · 2020 · International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry

Growth, Yield and Quality of Cauliflower as Influenced by Different Sources of Nutrients and Mulching in Indo- Gangatic Plains of Western Uttar Pradesh

Amit Kumar; Mukesh Kumar; Bijendra Singh; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at Horticulture Research Center of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology Meerut, (UP) India during rabi season 2018-19 and 2019-20 respectively with entitled “Effect of different sources of nutrients and mulching on sustainable production of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) cv. Pusa Ashwani”. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications and eleven treatments. The results showed that plants treated with integrated application of inorganic fertilizer, Vermicompost, Azotobacter, PSB (Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria), Black mulch (2.5 mm) proved significantly better over the recommended practice 100% RDF (Recommended doses of fertilizer) and control. However, plants treated without organic manures and inorganic fertilizers resulted in significant reduction for various growth, yield and quality parameters. Among the treatments, plants fortified with application of 50% RDF + 15 t/ha Vermicompost + Azotobacter (5 kg/ha) + PSB (5kg/ha) + Black mulch (2.5 mm) was found to better growth, yield and quality for both years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated fertilizer, vermicompost, Azotobacter, PSB and black mulch performed significantly better than recommended fertilizer and control treatments.

Treatment
integrated application of inorganic fertilizer, Vermicompost, Azotobacter, PSB (Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria), Black mulch (2.5 mm)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0other
Second interactor
PSB (Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria)e0other
Outcome
significantly bettere0
Direction
significantly bettere0
Comparator
recommended practice 100% RDF (Recommended doses of fertilizer) and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that plants treated with integrated application of inorganic fertilizer, Vermicompost, Azotobacter, PSB (Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria), Black mulch (2.5 mm) proved significantly better over the recommended practice 100% RDF (Recommended doses of fertilizer) and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding organic manures and inorganic fertilizers significantly reduced cauliflower growth, yield and quality parameters.

Treatment
without organic manures and inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
growth, yield and quality parameterse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, plants treated without organic manures and inorganic fertilizers resulted in significant reduction for various growth, yield and quality parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified 50% RDF, vermicompost, Azotobacter, PSB and black mulch combination gave better growth, yield and quality in both years.

Treatment
50% RDF + 15 t/ha Vermicompost + Azotobacter (5 kg/ha) + PSB (5kg/ha) + Black mulch (2.5 mm)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0other
Second interactor
PSBe0other
Outcome
growth, yield and qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
both yearse0
Comparator
the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treatments, plants fortified with application of 50% RDF + 15 t/ha Vermicompost + Azotobacter (5 kg/ha) + PSB (5kg/ha) + Black mulch (2.5 mm) was found to better growth, yield and quality for both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.