Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of drip irrigation and plastic mulch on yield, water use efficiency of cauliflower

Mintu Job; DK Rusia; Dinmani; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cauliflower is one of the main vegetable crop grown in India. It is a rich source of vitamin B and protein. The area under cauliflower in Jharkhand is 18610 ha and average productivity is around 16 ton per ha. For higher yield and quality of produce genetic modification of seed in form of hybrid and partially modified microclimate through plastic mulching and drip irrigation is essential. A trail was conducted at PFDC farms, BAU to study the effect of drip Irrigation and plastic mulch on yield, water use efficiency of Cauliflower during November 2011 to February 2013. The treatment taken were T1- Drip at 0.6 ET + Mulching, T2- Drip at 0.6 ET +without Mulching, T3- Drip at 0.8 ET + Mulching, T4- Drip at 0.8 ET + without Mulching, T5- Drip at 1.0 ET + Mulching, T6- Drip at 1.0 ET + without Mulching, T7- Conventional method of irrigation + without Mulching. The highest yield was observed in the treatment Drip at 1.0 ET with mulch (T5) which was significantly superior to all other treatments. However water productivity was highest for 0.6 ET with mulch (T1) followed by 0.8 ET with Mulch (T3) at 0.37 and 0.35 Kg/litre of water. Mulches have effected moderation of soil temperature across all treatments. Soil temperature was increased by an average degree in month January and February while there was a reduction on around 2 degree in March. The cultivation of cauliflower through drip irrigation with black plastic mulch (25 micron) increases the productivity and quality of produce with added benefit of water saving.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip at 1.0 ET with mulch gave the highest cauliflower yield and exceeded all other treatments significantly.

Treatment
Drip at 1.0 ET with mulch (T5)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was observed in the treatment Drip at 1.0 ET with mulch (T5) which was significantly superior to all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1002 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cauliflower during November 2011 to February 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–573 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip at 0.6 ET with mulch gave highest water productivity at 0.37 Kg/litre.

Treatment
0.6 ET with mulch (T1)e0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.37e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity was highest for 0.6 ET with mulch (T1) followed by 0.8 ET with Mulch (T3) at 0.37 and 0.35 Kg/litre of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cauliflower during November 2011 to February 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–573 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip at 0.8 ET with mulch had the next highest water productivity at 0.35 Kg/litre.

Treatment
0.8 ET with Mulch (T3)e0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
0.35 Kg/litre of watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity was highest for 0.6 ET with mulch (T1) followed by 0.8 ET with Mulch (T3) at 0.37 and 0.35 Kg/litre of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cauliflower during November 2011 to February 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulches moderated soil temperature across treatments.

Treatment
Mulchese0
Outcome
soil temperaturee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulches have effected moderation of soil temperature across all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1215 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cauliflower during November 2011 to February 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–573 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil temperature rose by an average degree in January and February under mulch.

Treatment
Mulchese1
Outcome
Soil temperaturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
an average degreee0
Qualifier
January and Februarye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil temperature was increased by an average degree in month January and February”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1298 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulches have effected moderation of soil temperature across all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1215 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cauliflower during November 2011 to February 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–573 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil temperature fell around 2 degrees in March under mulch.

Treatment
Mulchese1
Outcome
soil temperaturee1
Direction
reductione0
Value
around 2 degreee0
Qualifier
Marche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a reduction on around 2 degree in March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1354 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulches have effected moderation of soil temperature across all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1215 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cauliflower during November 2011 to February 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude drip irrigation with black plastic mulch increases cauliflower productivity.

Treatment
drip irrigation with black plastic mulch (25 micron)e0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivation of cauliflower through drip irrigation with black plastic mulch (25 micron) increases the productivity and quality of produce with added benefit of water saving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude drip irrigation with black plastic mulch increases cauliflower quality.

Treatment
drip irrigation with black plastic mulch (25 micron)e0
Outcome
quality of producee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivation of cauliflower through drip irrigation with black plastic mulch (25 micron) increases the productivity and quality of produce with added benefit of water saving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude drip irrigation with black plastic mulch saves water.

Treatment
drip irrigation with black plastic mulch (25 micron)e0
Outcome
water savinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivation of cauliflower through drip irrigation with black plastic mulch (25 micron) increases the productivity and quality of produce with added benefit of water saving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1532 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

61 papers: 49 positive, 12 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

mulching · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 47 positive, 17 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.