Paper · 2012 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of integrated nutrient management in mango cv. Sunderja

U.S. Gautam; Rajesh Singh; Neelam Tiwari; et al.

18
claims
38
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect on integrated plant nutrient management in mango cv. Sunderja during 2009–10. Different vegetative growth parameters, viz. plant height, canopy height, plant spread (N-S) and (E-W) as well as tree volume were not influenced significantly. However, the treatment T8 comprising 500:250:250 g N:P:K/tree + 50 kg FYM + 10 kg vermicompost registered the maximum plant height, canopy height, plant spread (N-S) and (E-W) as well as tree volume. On the other hand, full dose of NPK alone (T1) resulted in the lowest vegetative growth. As regards with the fruiting parameters, the treatment T8 resulted in maximum number of fruits/panicle, longer length and width, fruit weight, pulp weight, number of fruits and fruit yield. All the fruit quality parameters were found non-significant except TSS due to integrated plant nutrient management treatments. The total soluble solid was found highest (22.81°Brix) in T7 treatment, followed by T4 (22.63°Brix). The acidity was found lowest in Tand Ttreatments and highest in T, T, Tand Ttreatments, however the differences 1 7 356, 8 among the acidity values were non-significant. The pulp: stone and pulp: peel did not differ significantly due to integrated plant nutrient management treatments. However, the treatment T8 recorded the highest pulp: stone, whereas pulp: peel was highest in case of T4. Whereas, the second best pulp: stone was in T5 and pulp: peel in T8. On the other hand, the treatments T3 and T7 recorded lowest pulp: stone and pulp: peel. The shelf-life of mango fruits was influenced significantly due to integrated plant nutrient management treatments. The treatments T2, T6, T7 and T9 resulted in the maximum period of storage (>15 days) at room temperature. On the other hand, the control treatment having full dose of NPK only (T1) reduced the storage or shelf-life (9.9 days) of fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management did not significantly influence mango vegetative growth parameters.

Treatment
integrated plant nutrient managemente1
Outcome
plant height, canopy height, plant spread (N-S) and (E-W) as well as tree volumee0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different vegetative growth parameters, viz. plant height, canopy height, plant spread (N-S) and (E-W) as well as tree volume were not influenced significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–291 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect on integrated plant nutrient management in mango cv. Sunderja during 2009–10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 produced maximum vegetative growth measures.

Treatment
T8 comprising 500:250:250 g N:P:K/tree + 50 kg FYM + 10 kg vermicomposte0
Outcome
plant height, canopy height, plant spread (N-S) and (E-W) as well as tree volumee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T8 comprising 500:250:250 g N:P:K/tree + 50 kg FYM + 10 kg vermicompost registered the maximum plant height, canopy height, plant spread (N-S) and (E-W) as well as tree volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full NPK alone produced the lowest vegetative growth.

Treatment
full dose of NPK alone (T1)e0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“full dose of NPK alone (T1) resulted in the lowest vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave maximum fruit number and dimensions.

Treatment
T8e0
Outcome
number of fruits/panicle, longer length and widthe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T8 resulted in maximum number of fruits/panicle, longer length and width, fruit weight, pulp weight, number of fruits and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave maximum fruit and pulp weight and fruit yield.

Treatment
T8e0
Outcome
fruit weight, pulp weight, number of fruits and fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T8 resulted in maximum number of fruits/panicle, longer length and width, fruit weight, pulp weight, number of fruits and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality parameters except TSS were nonsignificant across nutrient treatments.

Treatment
integrated plant nutrient management treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit quality parameterse0
Direction
non-significante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the fruit quality parameters were found non-significant except TSS due to integrated plant nutrient management treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 had the highest TSS, 22.81°Brix.

Treatment
T7 treatmente0
Outcome
total soluble solide0
Direction
higheste0
Value
22.81°Brixe0
Qualifier
22.63°Brixe0
Comparator
T4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total soluble solid was found highest (22.81°Brix) in T7 treatment, followed by T4 (22.63°Brix).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 followed T7 in TSS at 22.63°Brix.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
total soluble solide0
Direction
followede0
Value
22.63°Brixe0
Comparator
T7 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total soluble solid was found highest (22.81°Brix) in T7 treatment, followed by T4 (22.63°Brix).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulp to stone and pulp to peel ratios did not differ significantly.

Treatment
integrated plant nutrient management treatmentse0
Outcome
pulp: stone and pulp: peele0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pulp: stone and pulp: peel did not differ significantly due to integrated plant nutrient management treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave the highest pulp to stone ratio.

Treatment
T8e0
Outcome
pulp: stonee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T8 recorded the highest pulp: stone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave the highest pulp to peel ratio.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
pulp: peele0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pulp: peel was highest in case of T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 was second best for pulp to stone ratio.

Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
pulp: stonee0
Direction
second beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the second best pulp: stone was in T5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 was second best for pulp to peel ratio.

Treatment
T8e0
Outcome
pulp: peele0
Direction
second beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pulp: peel in T8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1458 · show in text ↑
e1

“the second best pulp: stone was in T5 and pulp: peel in T8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 gave the lowest pulp to stone ratio.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
pulp: stonee0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments T3 and T7 recorded lowest pulp: stone and pulp: peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave the lowest pulp to peel ratio.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
pulp: peele0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments T3 and T7 recorded lowest pulp: stone and pulp: peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments significantly influenced fruit shelf life.

Treatment
integrated plant nutrient management treatmentse0
Outcome
shelf-life of mango fruitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shelf-life of mango fruits was influenced significantly due to integrated plant nutrient management treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2, T6, T7 and T9 gave maximum storage periods exceeding 15 days.

Treatment
T2, T6, T7 and T9e0
Outcome
period of storagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
>15 dayse0
Setting
room temperaturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments T2, T6, T7 and T9 resulted in the maximum period of storage (>15 days) at room temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1770 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full NPK alone reduced fruit shelf life to 9.9 days.

Treatment
full dose of NPK only (T1)e0
Outcome
storage or shelf-lifee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9.9 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control treatment having full dose of NPK only (T1) reduced the storage or shelf-life (9.9 days) of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1790–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango cv. Sunderja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.