Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Investigating Combined Drought- and Heat Stress Effects in Wheat under Controlled Conditions by Dynamic Image-Based Phenotyping

Lamis Osama Anwar Abdelhakim; Eva Rosenqvist; Bernd Wollenweber; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

As drought and heat stress are major challenges for crop productivity under future climate changes, tolerant cultivars are highly in demand. This study investigated the potential of existing Nordic wheat genotypes to resist unfavorable conditions. Four genotypes were selected based on their heat sensitivity (heat-sensitive: LM19, SF1; heat-tolerant: LM62, NS3). At the tillering stage, the plants were subjected to four treatments under controlled conditions: control, drought, heat and combined drought and heat stress. The morpho-physiological performance was quantified during the early and late phase of stress, as well as the recovery phase. We applied an integrative image-based phenotyping approach monitoring plant growth dynamics by structural Red Green Blue (RGB) imaging, photosynthetic performance by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging and transpiration efficiency by thermal infrared imaging. The results demonstrated that the selected genotypes were moderately affected in their photosynthetic efficiency and growth under drought stress, whereas heat and combined stress caused rapid reductions in photosynthesis and growth. Furthermore, drought stress had a major impact on canopy temperature. The NS3 genotype was the most robust genotype, as indicated by its improved response under all stress treatments due to its relatively small biomass. However, the genotypes showed different tolerance to individual and combined stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought moderately affected photosynthetic efficiency and growth.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiency and growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selected genotypes were moderately affected in their photosynthetic efficiency and growth under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat rapidly reduced photosynthesis and growth.

Treatment
heate0
Outcome
photosynthesis and growthe0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat and combined stress caused rapid reductions in photosynthesis and growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drought and heat rapidly reduced photosynthesis and growth.

Treatment
combined stresse0
Outcome
photosynthesis and growthe0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat and combined stress caused rapid reductions in photosynthesis and growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought strongly affected canopy temperature.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
canopy temperaturee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress had a major impact on canopy temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS3 was the most robust genotype under all stress treatments.

Material
NS3e0
Outcome
most robust genotypee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
relatively small biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NS3 genotype was the most robust genotype, as indicated by its improved response under all stress treatments due to its relatively small biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed in tolerance to individual and combined stress.

Outcome
tolerance to individual and combined stresse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the genotypes showed different tolerance to individual and combined stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑

heat · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 17 positive, 73 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.