Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of fertility levels and weed management practices on yield and economics of wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.)

Kali Deen; RP Singh; Chandra Shekhar; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2018–19 and 2019–20 at Agronomy Research Farm of Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Narendra Nagar (Kumarganj), Ayodhya, U.P. with two factor, 3 fertility levels (100% DRF through inorganic fertilizer, 75% RDF through inorganic + 25% N through FYM and 50% RDF through inorganic + 50% N through FYM) and 5 weed control practices (Sulfosulfuron + Metsulfuron @ 30 g a.i. + 4 g a.i. ha-1, Clodinafop + Metsulfuron @ 60 g a.i. + 4 g a.i. ha-1, Mesosulfuron + Iodosulfuron @ 12.2 g a.i + 2.2 g a.i. ha-1, weed free upto 60 Days and Weedy check. The treatments were replicated three times in a factorial randomized block design with fifteen treatment combinations. Among the treatment combinations 100% RDF (NPK- 150:60:40) with weed free upto 60 days was recorded maximum value of grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, gross returns and net returns during both the years. Higher benefit cost ratio was recorded with the treatment combinations of 100% RDF and Sulfosulfuron + Metsulfuron @ 30 g a.i. + 4 g a.i. ha-1. Thus, it may be concluded that application of 100% recommended dose of NPK ha−1 with Sulfosulfuron + Metsulfuron @ 30 g a.i. + 4 g a.i. ha-1 as proved most superior to other treatment in respect to higher benefit cast ratio of wheat crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilization with weed free conditions to 60 days gave maximum grain, straw and biological yields in both years.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
100% RDF (NPK- 150:60:40) with weed free upto 60 dayse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield, biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
during both the yearse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDF (NPK- 150:60:40) with weed free upto 60 days was recorded maximum value of grain yield, straw yield, biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same fertilization and weed free combination gave maximum gross and net returns in both years.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
100% RDF (NPK- 150:60:40) with weed free upto 60 dayse0
Outcome
gross returns and net returnse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDF (NPK- 150:60:40) with weed free upto 60 days was recorded maximum value of grain yield, straw yield, biological yield, gross returns and net returns during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended fertilization with Sulfosulfuron and Metsulfuron gave a higher benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
100% RDF and Sulfosulfuron + Metsulfuron @ 30 g a.i. + 4 g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher benefit cost ratio was recorded with the treatment combinations of 100% RDF and Sulfosulfuron + Metsulfuron @ 30 g a.i. + 4 g a.i. ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend full recommended NPK with Sulfosulfuron and Metsulfuron for wheat benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
application of 100% recommended dose of NPK ha−1 with Sulfosulfuron + Metsulfuron @ 30 g a.i. + 4 g a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
higher benefit cast ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100% recommended dose of NPK ha−1 with Sulfosulfuron + Metsulfuron @ 30 g a.i. + 4 g a.i. ha-1 as proved most superior to other treatment in respect to higher benefit cast ratio of wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1342 · show in text ↑

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.