Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Impact of method and levels of fertilizer application and weed management on nutrient economy and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

I.B. PANDEY; D.K. DWlVEDl; S.C. PRAKASH

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabl) seasons of 2002-03 and 2003-04 at Pusa, Bihar, to study the impact of fertilizer and weed-management practices on nutrient economy and yield of wheat (Triti- cum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.). Placement of fertilizers significantly reduced weed dry biomass, NPK depletion by weed and increased yield attributes, grain and straw yields, net return, net returnlrupee investment and NPK uptake by crop than broadcast method of fertilizer. Application of 125% of the recommended dose of fertilizer (150:75:50 kg N:P:Wha) recorded significantly higher weed dry biomass, grain and straw yields, net re- turn and NPK uptake by crop than recommended (120:60:40 kg N:P:Wha) and 75% of the recommended dose of fertilizer (90:45:30 kg N:P:Wha). However, net returnlrupee investment increased significantly only up to recom- mended dose of fertilizer. Hand-weeding recorded significantly higher plant height, leaf-area index, tillers/m2, graindear, grain and straw yields than mixture of 2,4-D + isoproturon, but was at par with those recorded under sulfosulfuron. Sulfosulfuron recorded lowest weed population, weed dry biomass, NPK depletion by weed and highest weed-control efficiency. Placement of recommended dose of fertilizer resulted in significantly hlgher grain yield than broadcast of 125% of the recommended dose of fertilizer, Similarly, recommended dose of fertil- izer under weed-control treatments recorded significantly higher grain yield than 125% of recommended dose of fertilizer under weedy check. Weed-control treatments also recorded higher protein content in grain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement reduced weed biomass and weed NPK depletion relative to broadcasting.

Treatment
Placement of fertilizerse0
Outcome
weed dry biomass, NPK depletion by weede0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
broadcast method of fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placement of fertilizers significantly reduced weed dry biomass, NPK depletion by weed and increased yield attributes, grain and straw yields, net return, net returnlrupee investment and NPK uptake by crop than broadcast method of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement increased wheat yield attributes and grain and straw yields relative to broadcasting.

Treatment
Placement of fertilizerse0
Outcome
yield attributes, grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
broadcast method of fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placement of fertilizers significantly reduced weed dry biomass, NPK depletion by weed and increased yield attributes, grain and straw yields, net return, net returnlrupee investment and NPK uptake by crop than broadcast method of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement increased net returns and return per rupee relative to broadcasting.

Treatment
Placement of fertilizerse0
Outcome
net return, net returnlrupee investmente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
broadcast method of fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placement of fertilizers significantly reduced weed dry biomass, NPK depletion by weed and increased yield attributes, grain and straw yields, net return, net returnlrupee investment and NPK uptake by crop than broadcast method of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement increased crop NPK uptake relative to broadcasting.

Treatment
Placement of fertilizerse0
Outcome
NPK uptake by crope0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
broadcast method of fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placement of fertilizers significantly reduced weed dry biomass, NPK depletion by weed and increased yield attributes, grain and straw yields, net return, net returnlrupee investment and NPK uptake by crop than broadcast method of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% fertilizer dose increased weed biomass versus lower doses.

Treatment
125% of the recommended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
weed dry biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
recommendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 125% of the recommended dose of fertilizer (150:75:50 kg N:P:Wha) recorded significantly higher weed dry biomass, grain and straw yields, net re- turn and NPK uptake by crop than recommended (120:60:40 kg N:P:Wha) and 75% of the recommended dose of fertilizer (90:45:30 kg N:P:Wha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% fertilizer dose increased grain and straw yields and net return versus lower doses.

Treatment
125% of the recommended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
grain and straw yields, net re- turne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
recommendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 125% of the recommended dose of fertilizer (150:75:50 kg N:P:Wha) recorded significantly higher weed dry biomass, grain and straw yields, net re- turn and NPK uptake by crop than recommended (120:60:40 kg N:P:Wha) and 75% of the recommended dose of fertilizer (90:45:30 kg N:P:Wha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% fertilizer dose increased crop NPK uptake versus lower doses.

Treatment
125% of the recommended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
NPK uptake by crope0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
recommendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 125% of the recommended dose of fertilizer (150:75:50 kg N:P:Wha) recorded significantly higher weed dry biomass, grain and straw yields, net re- turn and NPK uptake by crop than recommended (120:60:40 kg N:P:Wha) and 75% of the recommended dose of fertilizer (90:45:30 kg N:P:Wha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Return per rupee rose significantly only up to the recommended fertilizer dose.

Treatment
recom- mended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
net returnlrupee investmente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returnlrupee investment increased significantly only up to recom- mended dose of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-weeding increased wheat height, leaf area, tillers, grains per ear and yields versus 2,4-D plus isoproturon.

Treatment
Hand-weedinge0
Outcome
plant height, leaf-area index, tillers/m2e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mixture of 2,4-D + isoproturone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand-weeding recorded significantly higher plant height, leaf-area index, tillers/m2, graindear, grain and straw yields than mixture of 2,4-D + isoproturon, but was at par with those recorded under sulfosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-weeding yielded values on par with sulfosulfuron.

Treatment
Hand-weedinge0
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
sulfosulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand-weeding recorded significantly higher plant height, leaf-area index, tillers/m2, graindear, grain and straw yields than mixture of 2,4-D + isoproturon, but was at par with those recorded under sulfosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron gave the lowest weed population, biomass and weed NPK depletion.

Treatment
Sulfosulfurone0
Outcome
weed population, weed dry biomass, NPK depletion by weede0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfosulfuron recorded lowest weed population, weed dry biomass, NPK depletion by weed and highest weed-control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron gave the highest weed-control efficiency.

Treatment
Sulfosulfurone0
Outcome
weed-control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfosulfuron recorded lowest weed population, weed dry biomass, NPK depletion by weed and highest weed-control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Placed recommended fertilizer yielded more grain than broadcast 125% fertilizer.

Treatment
Placement of recommended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
hlghere0
Comparator
broadcast of 125% of the recommended dose of fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placement of recommended dose of fertilizer resulted in significantly hlgher grain yield than broadcast of 125% of the recommended dose of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended fertilizer with weed control yielded more grain than 125% fertilizer without weed control.

Treatment
recommended dose of fertil- izer under weed-control treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
125% of recommended dose of fertilizer under weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recommended dose of fertil- izer under weed-control treatments recorded significantly higher grain yield than 125% of recommended dose of fertilizer under weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control increased wheat grain protein content.

Treatment
Weed-control treatmentse0
Outcome
protein content in graine0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed-control treatments also recorded higher protein content in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–132 · show in text ↑

herbicide · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

33 papers: 20 positive, 13 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

85 papers: 49 positive, 36 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.