Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Application of mulch and soil ameliorant for increasing soil productivity and its financial analysis on shallots farming in the upland

U Haryati; Irawan; Maswar

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Technology to improve soil quality is required on degraded uplands. This study aimed to determine the effect of mulch and soil ameliorant on soil quality and shallots yield. The study was conducted in March to June 2017 in Garut Regency, West Java Province, Indonesia. The experimental design used was splitplot design with 3 replications. Main plot was type of mulch consisted of 3 treatments (no mulch, plastic, straw), while sub-plot was soil ameliorant application consisted of 5 treatments: farmer practise (B-1), B-1 + recommended fertilizer, B-1 + 5 t ha −1 dolomite, B-1 + 5 t ha −1 biochar, B-1 + 5 t ha −1 dolomite + 5 t ha −1 biochar). The results showed that dolomite increased pH, K2O, P2O5, Ca-exch and base saturation. Straw mulch and soil ameliorant increased total pore space, aeration pore, aggregate stability index and permeability. The highest yield (18.8 t ha −1 ) was achieved at treatment without mulch with farmer practise plus biochar (5 t ha −1 ) and plastic mulch with farmer practise plus dolomite (5 t ha −1 ) and biochar (5 t ha −1 ). The incremental yield was about 15.0% compared to farmer practise. The research treatments were financially feasible with ratio R/C of 1.5 - 2.4.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite increased soil pH, K2O and P2O5.

Treatment
dolomitee0
Outcome
pH, K2O, P2O5e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dolomite increased pH, K2O, P2O5, Ca-exch and base saturation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomite increased exchangeable calcium and base saturation.

Treatment
dolomitee0
Outcome
Ca-exch and base saturatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dolomite increased pH, K2O, P2O5, Ca-exch and base saturation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch and soil ameliorant increased total pore space and aeration pore.

Treatment
Straw mulch and soil ameliorante0
Outcome
total pore space, aeration poree0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw mulch and soil ameliorant increased total pore space, aeration pore, aggregate stability index and permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch and soil ameliorant increased aggregate stability and permeability.

Treatment
Straw mulch and soil ameliorante0
Outcome
aggregate stability index and permeabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw mulch and soil ameliorant increased total pore space, aeration pore, aggregate stability index and permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No mulch with farmer practice plus biochar achieved the highest yield of 18.8 t ha −1.

Treatment
without mulch with farmer practise plus biochar (5 t ha −1 )e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.8 t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield (18.8 t ha −1 ) was achieved at treatment without mulch with farmer practise plus biochar (5 t ha −1 ) and plastic mulch with farmer practise plus dolomite (5 t ha −1 ) and biochar (5 t ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch with farmer practice plus dolomite and biochar also achieved the highest yield of 18.8 t ha −1.

Treatment
plastic mulch with farmer practise plus dolomite (5 t ha −1 ) and biochar (5 t ha −1 )e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.8 t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield (18.8 t ha −1 ) was achieved at treatment without mulch with farmer practise plus biochar (5 t ha −1 ) and plastic mulch with farmer practise plus dolomite (5 t ha −1 ) and biochar (5 t ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increased by about 15% versus farmer practice.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
incrementale0
Value
15.0%e0
Comparator
farmer practisee0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incremental yield was about 15.0% compared to farmer practise”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments were financially feasible with R/C ratios of 1.5 to 2.4.

Outcome
ratio R/Ce0
Value
1.5 - 2.4e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The research treatments were financially feasible with ratio R/C of 1.5 - 2.4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallots farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–120 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

lime · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

biochar · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

lime · soil: chemistry · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · soil: physics · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.