Abstract
This work was carried out of private farm located in Qalabshu, Gamasa District, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt, during the early summer plantings of 2017 and 2018 to study the effect of different sources of organic manures and different levels of humic and fulvic acid on growth, flowering, yield and its components and sugar in fruit of watermelon plants (Citrullus lantus L.) c.v. Romero grafted on Shantosa species. Twenty two treatments were designed in complete randomize block system with three replications, The treatments consisted of (FYM, Compost, Chicken manure and mix between them) in presence of 2 and 4 kg for each humic and fulvic acid comparing to the control. The results obtained shows that there were significant differences among treatments in most parameters during the two seasons. All organic sources increased all parameters and found that the highest significant values of leaf area, dry weight, number of male and female flower as well as average weight of fruits, number of fruits, dry matter, total yield, reducing , non reducing and total sugar of fruits were recorded with application of (FYM + compost + chicken manures) in presence of 4 kg humic and 4 kg fulvic acid.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Organic sources increased measured watermelon growth, flowering, yield and fruit quality parameters.
- Taxon
- watermelon plants
Citrullus lanatuse1 - Treatment
- organic sourcese0
- Outcome
- all parameterse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All organic sources increased all parameters”
e1“watermelon plants (Citrullus lantus L.)”
e2“comparing to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined manure treatment with 4 kg humic and fulvic acid produced the highest leaf area, dry weight and flower numbers.
- Taxon
- watermelon plantsCitrullus lanatuse1
- Treatment
- (FYM + compost + chicken manures) in presence of 4 kg humic and 4 kg fulvic acide0
- Outcome
- leaf area, dry weight, number of male and female flowere0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest significant values of leaf area, dry weight, number of male and female flower as well as average weight of fruits, number of fruits, dry matter, total yield, reducing , non reducing and total sugar of fruits were recorded with application of (FYM + compost + chicken manures) in presence of 4 kg humic and 4 kg fulvic acid.”
e1“watermelon plants (Citrullus lantus L.)”
e2“comparing to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined manure treatment with 4 kg humic and fulvic acid produced the highest fruit weight, fruit count and total yield.
- Taxon
- watermelon plantsCitrullus lanatuse1
- Treatment
- (FYM + compost + chicken manures) in presence of 4 kg humic and 4 kg fulvic acide0
- Outcome
- average weight of fruits, number of fruits, dry matter, total yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest significant values of leaf area, dry weight, number of male and female flower as well as average weight of fruits, number of fruits, dry matter, total yield, reducing , non reducing and total sugar of fruits were recorded with application of (FYM + compost + chicken manures) in presence of 4 kg humic and 4 kg fulvic acid.”
e1“watermelon plants (Citrullus lantus L.)”
e2“comparing to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined manure treatment with 4 kg humic and fulvic acid produced the highest reducing, non reducing and total fruit sugars.
- Taxon
- watermelon plantsCitrullus lanatuse1
- Treatment
- (FYM + compost + chicken manures) in presence of 4 kg humic and 4 kg fulvic acide0
- Outcome
- reducing , non reducing and total sugar of fruitse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest significant values of leaf area, dry weight, number of male and female flower as well as average weight of fruits, number of fruits, dry matter, total yield, reducing , non reducing and total sugar of fruits were recorded with application of (FYM + compost + chicken manures) in presence of 4 kg humic and 4 kg fulvic acid.”
e1“watermelon plants (Citrullus lantus L.)”
e2“comparing to the control”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ
88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →other · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fertilization · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →other · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.