Paper · 2020 · Phyton

AM Fungi and Piriformospora indica Improve Plant Growth of Pinus elliottiiSeedlings

Taoze Sun; Wei Tan; Yujie Yang; et al.

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Pinus elliottii is an exotic afforestation pine extensively distributed in southern parts of China. In order to understand whether endophytic fungi can affect seedling growth of P. elliottii, Piriformospora indica (Pi), Funnelifcrmis mosseae (Fm), and Diversispora tortuosa (Dt) were inoculated respectively, and the non-inoculated group was set as control. The growth indexes, the contents of soluble sugar and soluble protein, and plant endogenous hormone levels in the leaves of P. elliottii, were analyzed. The results showed that Fm, Dt and Pi colonized the P. elliottii roots to form mycorrhizal structure and chlamydospores arranged in beads respectively. Three fungal inoculants exhibited the stimulated growth responses, whilst Dt illustrated the most positive effect on plant height, single fresh weight, trunk diameter and root system structure, compared with the control. On the other hand, the soluble sugar and soluble protein contents were increased distinctively in mycorrhizal plants. The endogenous IAA, GA3, ZR contents were increased, while the ABA contents were reduced in mycorrhizal plants versus non-mycorrhizal plants. The fungi-induced endogenous hormone changes triggered plant growth improvement of P. elliottii seedlings. This research unraveled the positive effect of AM fungi and P. indica on growth of pine seedlings, while, more application of endophytic fungi to fields needs to be explored.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fm colonized P. elliottii roots.

Taxon
P. elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Interactor
Fme0symbiont
Outcome
colonized the P. elliottii rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that Fm, Dt and Pi colonized the P. elliottii roots to form mycorrhizal structure and chlamydospores arranged in beads respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–662 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dt colonized P. elliottii roots.

Taxon
P. elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Interactor
Dte0symbiont
Outcome
colonized the P. elliottii rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that Fm, Dt and Pi colonized the P. elliottii roots to form mycorrhizal structure and chlamydospores arranged in beads respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–662 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pi colonized P. elliottii roots.

Taxon
P. elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Interactor
Pie0symbiont
Outcome
colonized the P. elliottii rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that Fm, Dt and Pi colonized the P. elliottii roots to form mycorrhizal structure and chlamydospores arranged in beads respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fm stimulated pine seedling growth.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
Three fungal inoculantse0
Interactor
Fme1symbiont
Outcome
growth responsese0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three fungal inoculants exhibited the stimulated growth responses, whilst Dt illustrated the most positive effect on plant height, single fresh weight, trunk diameter and root system structure, compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that Fm, Dt and Pi colonized the P. elliottii roots to form mycorrhizal structure and chlamydospores arranged in beads respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dt stimulated pine seedling growth.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
Three fungal inoculantse0
Interactor
Dte1symbiont
Outcome
growth responsese0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three fungal inoculants exhibited the stimulated growth responses, whilst Dt illustrated the most positive effect on plant height, single fresh weight, trunk diameter and root system structure, compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that Fm, Dt and Pi colonized the P. elliottii roots to form mycorrhizal structure and chlamydospores arranged in beads respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pi stimulated pine seedling growth.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
Three fungal inoculantse0
Interactor
Pie1symbiont
Outcome
growth responsese0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three fungal inoculants exhibited the stimulated growth responses, whilst Dt illustrated the most positive effect on plant height, single fresh weight, trunk diameter and root system structure, compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that Fm, Dt and Pi colonized the P. elliottii roots to form mycorrhizal structure and chlamydospores arranged in beads respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dt gave the most positive effect on pine plant height compared with control.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
Dte0
Interactor
Dte0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
most positivee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three fungal inoculants exhibited the stimulated growth responses, whilst Dt illustrated the most positive effect on plant height, single fresh weight, trunk diameter and root system structure, compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dt gave the most positive effect on pine single fresh weight compared with control.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
Dte0
Interactor
Dte0symbiont
Outcome
single fresh weighte0
Direction
most positivee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three fungal inoculants exhibited the stimulated growth responses, whilst Dt illustrated the most positive effect on plant height, single fresh weight, trunk diameter and root system structure, compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dt gave the most positive effect on pine trunk diameter compared with control.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
Dte0
Interactor
Dte0symbiont
Outcome
trunk diametere0
Direction
most positivee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three fungal inoculants exhibited the stimulated growth responses, whilst Dt illustrated the most positive effect on plant height, single fresh weight, trunk diameter and root system structure, compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dt gave the most positive effect on pine root system structure compared with control.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
Dte0
Interactor
Dte0symbiont
Outcome
root system structuree0
Direction
most positivee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three fungal inoculants exhibited the stimulated growth responses, whilst Dt illustrated the most positive effect on plant height, single fresh weight, trunk diameter and root system structure, compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal pine plants had increased soluble sugar and soluble protein contents.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Outcome
soluble sugar and soluble protein contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the other hand, the soluble sugar and soluble protein contents were increased distinctively in mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal pine plants had increased IAA content versus non-mycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Outcome
IAAe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The endogenous IAA, GA3, ZR contents were increased, while the ABA contents were reduced in mycorrhizal plants versus non-mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal pine plants had increased GA3 content versus non-mycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Outcome
GA3e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The endogenous IAA, GA3, ZR contents were increased, while the ABA contents were reduced in mycorrhizal plants versus non-mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal pine plants had increased ZR content versus non-mycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Outcome
ZRe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The endogenous IAA, GA3, ZR contents were increased, while the ABA contents were reduced in mycorrhizal plants versus non-mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal pine plants had reduced ABA content versus non-mycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiit0
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Outcome
ABAe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The endogenous IAA, GA3, ZR contents were increased, while the ABA contents were reduced in mycorrhizal plants versus non-mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus elliottii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute pine seedling growth improvement to fungi-induced hormone changes.

Taxon
P. elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Outcome
plant growth improvemente0
Qualifier
fungi-induced endogenous hormone changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungi-induced endogenous hormone changes triggered plant growth improvement of P. elliottii seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1250 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Pinus elliottii (slash pine)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.