Paper · 1994 · New Phytologist

Genetics of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis

S. C. S. ROSADO; B. R. KROPP; Y. PICHÉ

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
48
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The interactions between genotypes of Pinus elliottii and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt) were investigated to assess genetic variability and heritability of root morphology and ectomycorrhizal traits. Seedlings from 15 open‐pollinated pine families, which were either uninoculated or inoculated with Pt and grown under controlled conditions in growth pouches, were analyzed for the following traits: number of shoot roots (SRN), root dry weight (RDW), shoot/root dry weight ratio (SRR), number of ectomycorrhizes (ECN), percentage ectomycorrhizal colonization (ECP) and development of extramatrical mycelium (EMD). There were significant increases in SRN and SRR in inoculated seedlings and significant family variation for RDW and SRR traits. A significant inoculation × family interaction was observed for SRN, but not for RDW and SRR. The individual narrow‐sense heritabilities for SRN, RDW and SRR were, respectively, 0·55, 1·00 and 0·68 (inoculated) and 0·43, 1·00 and 0·25 (uninoculated). The higher heritabilities for the ectomycorrhizal traits were 0·60, 0·81 and 0·53 for ECN, ECP and EMD, respectively. The higher heritabilities of root morphology traits for inoculated seedlings indicates that the mycorrhizal condition of plants should be an important factor in increasing root quality from genetic selection, especially on poor sites where the plants are more dependent on mycorrhizal. The relatively strong genetic control of ectomycorrhizal traits indicates a great potential for selecting individuals in tree breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Pisolithus tinctorius increased shoot root number (SRN) and shoot/root dry weight ratio (SRR) in Pinus elliottii seedlings compared with uninoculated seedlings.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Material
open‐pollinated pine familiese2
Treatment
inoculated with Pte2
Interactor
Pisolithus tinctoriusPisolithus tinctoriuse0symbiont
Outcome
SRN and SRRe1
Direction
increasese1
Comparator
uninoculatede2
Setting
controlled conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pisolithus tinctorius
Pisolithus tinctorius · InteractorPaul venter · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between genotypes of Pinus elliottii and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were significant increases in SRN and SRR in inoculated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–717 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seedlings from 15 open‐pollinated pine families, which were either uninoculated or inoculated with Pt and grown under controlled conditions in growth pouches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–389 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Family variation was significant for root dry weight (RDW) and SRR in Pinus elliottii seedlings.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Outcome
RDW and SRRe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between genotypes of Pinus elliottii and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–119 · show in text ↑
e3

“significant family variation for RDW and SRR traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–773 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A significant inoculation × family interaction was observed for SRN in Pinus elliottii seedlings.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Treatment
inoculatione4
Outcome
SRNe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between genotypes of Pinus elliottii and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“A significant inoculation × family interaction was observed for SRN, but not for RDW and SRR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No inoculation × family interaction was found for RDW and SRR in Pinus elliottii seedlings.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Treatment
inoculatione4
Outcome
RDW and SRRe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between genotypes of Pinus elliottii and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“A significant inoculation × family interaction was observed for SRN, but not for RDW and SRR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–867 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow-sense heritabilities for SRN, RDW and SRR were 0·55, 1·00 and 0·68 in inoculated seedlings.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Treatment
inoculatede5
Outcome
heritabilities for SRN, RDW and SRRe5
Value
0·55, 1·00 and 0·68e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between genotypes of Pinus elliottii and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–119 · show in text ↑
e5

“The individual narrow‐sense heritabilities for SRN, RDW and SRR were, respectively, 0·55, 1·00 and 0·68 (inoculated) and 0·43, 1·00 and 0·25 (uninoculated)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1024 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow-sense heritabilities for SRN, RDW and SRR were 0·43, 1·00 and 0·25 in uninoculated seedlings.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Treatment
uninoculatede5
Outcome
heritabilities for SRN, RDW and SRRe5
Value
0·43, 1·00 and 0·25e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between genotypes of Pinus elliottii and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–119 · show in text ↑
e5

“The individual narrow‐sense heritabilities for SRN, RDW and SRR were, respectively, 0·55, 1·00 and 0·68 (inoculated) and 0·43, 1·00 and 0·25 (uninoculated)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1024 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heritabilities for the ectomycorrhizal traits ECN, ECP and EMD were 0·60, 0·81 and 0·53.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Outcome
heritabilities for the ectomycorrhizal traitse6
Value
0·60, 0·81 and 0·53e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between genotypes of Pinus elliottii and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–119 · show in text ↑
e6

“The higher heritabilities for the ectomycorrhizal traits were 0·60, 0·81 and 0·53 for ECN, ECP and EMD, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heritabilities of root morphology traits were higher in inoculated seedlings.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Treatment
inoculated seedlingse7
Outcome
heritabilities of root morphology traitse7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between genotypes of Pinus elliottii and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–119 · show in text ↑
e7

“The higher heritabilities of root morphology traits for inoculated seedlings indicates that the mycorrhizal condition of plants should be an important factor in increasing root quality from genetic selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1351 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The mycorrhizal condition of plants should be an important factor in increasing root quality from genetic selection, especially on poor sites.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee7
Outcome
increasing root quality from genetic selectione7

Verbatim

e7

“The higher heritabilities of root morphology traits for inoculated seedlings indicates that the mycorrhizal condition of plants should be an important factor in increasing root quality from genetic selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ectomycorrhizal traits show relatively strong genetic control in Pinus elliottii.

Taxon
Pinus elliottiiPinus elliottiie0
Outcome
genetic control of ectomycorrhizal traitse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interactions between genotypes of Pinus elliottii and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–119 · show in text ↑
e7

“The relatively strong genetic control of ectomycorrhizal traits indicates a great potential for selecting individuals in tree breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1573 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Strong genetic control of ectomycorrhizal traits gives a great potential for selecting individuals in tree breeding programs.

Taxon
treee7
Outcome
selecting individuals in tree breeding programse7

Verbatim

e7

“The relatively strong genetic control of ectomycorrhizal traits indicates a great potential for selecting individuals in tree breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1573 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Pinus elliottii (slash pine)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.