Paper · 2020 · Plant Biology

The OPR gene family in watermelon: Genome‐wide identification and expression profiling under hormone treatments and root‐knot nematode infection

Y. Guang; S. Luo; G. J. Ahammed; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
26
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The enzyme 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid reductase (OPR) is important in the jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis pathway and thus plays a vital role in plant defence. However, systematic and comprehensive analyses of OPR genes in watermelon and their roles in defence responses are extremely limited. The physicochemical properties, phylogenetic tree, gene structure and cis-acting elements of watermelon OPR genes were analysed using bioinformatics, and qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq were applied to assay expression of OPR genes in watermelon. A total of five OPR family genes were identified in watermelon, which were unevenly distributed across the four chromosomes. Phylogenetic analysis assigned OPR members from different plant species to five subfamilies (OPRI-OPRV). The motif compositions of OPR members were relatively conserved. Expression analysis using qRT-PCR revealed that ClOPR genes, except for ClOPR5, were highly expressed in the flower and fruit. RNA-seq analysis showed that the ClOPR genes had different expression patterns during flesh and rind development. Furthermore, the ClOPR genes, particularly ClOPR2 and ClOPR4, were significantly upregulated by exogenous JA, salicylic acid (SA) and ethylene (ET) treatments. In addition, red light induced expression of ClOPR2 and ClOPR4 in leaves and roots of root-knot nematode (RKN)-infected watermelon plants, suggesting their involvement in red light-induced defence against RKN. These results provide a theoretical basis for elucidating the diverse functions of OPR family genes in watermelon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five OPR genes were found on four watermelon chromosomes.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Gene
OPR family genese0
Outcome
unevenly distributed across the four chromosomese0
Value
fivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of five OPR family genes were identified in watermelon, which were unevenly distributed across the four chromosomes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–651 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phylogenetic analysis assigned OPR members to five subfamilies.

Taxon
different plant speciese0
Gene
OPR memberse0
Outcome
five subfamilies (OPRI-OPRV)e0
Value
five subfamiliese0

Verbatim

e0

“Phylogenetic analysis assigned OPR members from different plant species to five subfamilies (OPRI-OPRV).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–756 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPR motif compositions were relatively conserved.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Gene
OPR memberse0
Outcome
motif compositionse0
Direction
relatively conservede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The motif compositions of OPR members were relatively conserved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ClOPR genes other than ClOPR5 were highly expressed in flower and fruit.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
flower and fruite0
Gene
ClOPR genese0
Outcome
highly expressede0
Qualifier
except for ClOPR5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ClOPR genes, except for ClOPR5, were highly expressed in the flower and fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ClOPR genes showed differing expression across flesh and rind development.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
flesh and rind developmente0
Gene
ClOPR genese0
Outcome
different expression patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ClOPR genes had different expression patterns during flesh and rind development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous JA, SA and ET significantly upregulated ClOPR genes, especially ClOPR2 and ClOPR4.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
exogenous JA, salicylic acid (SA) and ethylene (ET) treatmentse0
Gene
ClOPR2 and ClOPR4e0
Outcome
ClOPR genese0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ClOPR genes, particularly ClOPR2 and ClOPR4, were significantly upregulated by exogenous JA, salicylic acid (SA) and ethylene (ET) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light induced ClOPR2 and ClOPR4 expression in leaves and roots of nematode-infected plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
red lighte0
Interactor
root-knot nematode (RKN)Meloidogynee0pathogen
Gene
ClOPR2 and ClOPR4e0
Outcome
expression of ClOPR2 and ClOPR4e0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red light induced expression of ClOPR2 and ClOPR4 in leaves and roots of root-knot nematode (RKN)-infected watermelon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1360 · show in text ↑

jasmonic acid · molecular: expression · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · molecular: expression · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ethene · molecular: expression · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · Meloidogyne · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.