Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Screening and Management of Rice Germplasm against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae

Seethiya Mahajan; Prem Chinabi Aryan; Anmoljeet Kaur; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present studies on “Management of bacterial leaf blight of paddy (Oryza sativa L.) caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae” were undertaken in order to determine the status of the bacterial leaf blight of paddy in Jammu Division 2015. Maximum disease incidence was recorded in Kulian (45.33 per cent) of Jammu district and minimum in Jagatpur (15.21%) of Kathua district. Overall average disease incidence for all three districts was 33.53 per cent. Sixteen germplasm were screened under field condition against bacterial leaf blight, and no germplasm was found immune or resistant to the disease, four were moderately resistant, whereas eleven were moderately susceptible. However, Jaya was found to be susceptible. Fungicide and antibiotic for disease management revealed that minimum disease severity of 11.33% was recorded in streptomycin followed by copper oxychloride (16.00 % disease severity); second date of transplanting (15th July) and second irrigation schedule (water drained out after tillering stage) was found most effective among all the treatments of disease management with maximum 11.67 numbers of tillers per hill, plant height of 124.67cm, panicle length of 27.43 cm and yield of 41.34 q/ha while the first date of transplanting (5th July) with first irrigation schedule (stagnant water) was least effective treatment with 6.33 tillers per hill and plant height 105.00 cm and panicle length 18.23 cm along with 22.46 q/ha yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice bacterial leaf blight incidence at Kulian was 45.33 per cent.

Interactor
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzaeXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzaet1pathogene0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
45.33 per cente0
Setting
Kuliane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae · InteractorDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum disease incidence was recorded in Kulian (45.33 per cent) of Jammu district and minimum in Jagatpur (15.21%) of Kathua district.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice bacterial leaf blight incidence at Jagatpur was 15.21%.

Interactor
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzaeXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzaet1pathogene0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
15.21%e0
Setting
Jagatpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae · InteractorDonald Groth, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum disease incidence was recorded in Kulian (45.33 per cent) of Jammu district and minimum in Jagatpur (15.21%) of Kathua district.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average rice disease incidence across three districts was 33.53 per cent.

Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
33.53 per cente0
Setting
three districtse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall average disease incidence for all three districts was 33.53 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice germplasm screening found no germplasm was found immune or resistant.

Outcome
no germplasm was found immune or resistante0
Value
no germplasme0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no germplasm was found immune or resistant to the disease, four were moderately resistant, whereas eleven were moderately susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice germplasm screening found moderately resistant.

Outcome
moderately resistante0
Value
foure0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no germplasm was found immune or resistant to the disease, four were moderately resistant, whereas eleven were moderately susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice germplasm screening found moderately susceptible.

Outcome
moderately susceptiblee0
Value
elevene0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no germplasm was found immune or resistant to the disease, four were moderately resistant, whereas eleven were moderately susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jaya rice was susceptible to bacterial leaf blight.

Material
Jayae0
Outcome
susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, Jaya was found to be susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

streptomycin treatment had rice disease severity of 11.33%.

Treatment
streptomycine0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
minimume0
Value
11.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum disease severity of 11.33% was recorded in streptomycin followed by copper oxychloride (16.00 % disease severity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

copper oxychloride treatment had rice disease severity of 16.00 %.

Treatment
copper oxychloridee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
16.00 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum disease severity of 11.33% was recorded in streptomycin followed by copper oxychloride (16.00 % disease severity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice tillers per hill was higher under the second transplanting and irrigation schedules than the first schedules.

Treatment
second date of transplanting (15th July) and second irrigation schedule (water drained out after tillering stage)e0
Outcome
tillers per hille0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.67e0
Qualifier
6.33e0
Comparator
first date of transplanting (5th July) with first irrigation schedule (stagnant water)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“second date of transplanting (15th July) and second irrigation schedule (water drained out after tillering stage) was found most effective among all the treatments of disease management with maximum 11.67 numbers of tillers per hill, plant height of 124.67cm, panicle length of 27.43 cm and yield of 41.34 q/ha while the first date of transplanting (5th July) with first irrigation schedule (stagnant water) was least effective treatment with 6.33 tillers per hill and plant height 105.00 cm and panicle length 18.23 cm along with 22.46 q/ha yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice plant height was higher under the second transplanting and irrigation schedules than the first schedules.

Treatment
second date of transplanting (15th July) and second irrigation schedule (water drained out after tillering stage)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
124.67cme0
Qualifier
105.00 cme0
Comparator
first date of transplanting (5th July) with first irrigation schedule (stagnant water)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“second date of transplanting (15th July) and second irrigation schedule (water drained out after tillering stage) was found most effective among all the treatments of disease management with maximum 11.67 numbers of tillers per hill, plant height of 124.67cm, panicle length of 27.43 cm and yield of 41.34 q/ha while the first date of transplanting (5th July) with first irrigation schedule (stagnant water) was least effective treatment with 6.33 tillers per hill and plant height 105.00 cm and panicle length 18.23 cm along with 22.46 q/ha yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice panicle length was higher under the second transplanting and irrigation schedules than the first schedules.

Treatment
second date of transplanting (15th July) and second irrigation schedule (water drained out after tillering stage)e0
Outcome
panicle lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
27.43 cme0
Qualifier
18.23 cme0
Comparator
first date of transplanting (5th July) with first irrigation schedule (stagnant water)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“second date of transplanting (15th July) and second irrigation schedule (water drained out after tillering stage) was found most effective among all the treatments of disease management with maximum 11.67 numbers of tillers per hill, plant height of 124.67cm, panicle length of 27.43 cm and yield of 41.34 q/ha while the first date of transplanting (5th July) with first irrigation schedule (stagnant water) was least effective treatment with 6.33 tillers per hill and plant height 105.00 cm and panicle length 18.23 cm along with 22.46 q/ha yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield was higher under the second transplanting and irrigation schedules than the first schedules.

Treatment
second date of transplanting (15th July) and second irrigation schedule (water drained out after tillering stage)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
41.34 q/hae0
Qualifier
22.46 q/hae0
Comparator
first date of transplanting (5th July) with first irrigation schedule (stagnant water)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“second date of transplanting (15th July) and second irrigation schedule (water drained out after tillering stage) was found most effective among all the treatments of disease management with maximum 11.67 numbers of tillers per hill, plant height of 124.67cm, panicle length of 27.43 cm and yield of 41.34 q/ha while the first date of transplanting (5th July) with first irrigation schedule (stagnant water) was least effective treatment with 6.33 tillers per hill and plant height 105.00 cm and panicle length 18.23 cm along with 22.46 q/ha yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–32 · show in text ↑

copper atom · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

streptomycin · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tillage · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 116 positive, 33 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

145 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 190 positive, 37 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.