Paper · 2020 · Italian Journal of Agronomy

Grain yield and associated physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars under different planting dates and drought stress at the flowering stage

Aliakbar Shafighi; Mohammad Reza Ardakani; Amir Hossein Shirani Rad; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Highlights- ES Hydromel as a new hybrid cultivar under late-season drought stress conditions is proposed in cold temperate regions with arid and semi-arid climates. - Late sowing date has extremely caused a negative effect on the winter rapeseed’s physiological traits during the cold season. - The result of cluster analysis based on grain yield loss led to the formation of two clusters, which ES Hydromel and ES Alonso with lower yield loss were grouped in the tolerant cluster. - ES Hydromel in the late planting date and irrigation interruption conditions obtained the lowest stomatal resistance. - ES Hydromel on regular date and normal irrigation conditions obtained the highest leaf relative water content. The adverse effects of abiotic stresses have always restricted oilseed crop production, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. On the other side, global climate change has led us to adapt planting dates and select tolerant cultivars to encounter the new climatic conditions. To evaluate the effect of late-season drought stress under different planting dates on rapeseed cultivars, an experiment was conducted as a factorial split-plot based on randomised complete block design in Karaj region-Iran, during 2015-2017. Planting date and irrigation treatments were considered in the main plots as factorial and cultivars were placed in subplots. Two planting dates were regular date (October 7) (PD1) and late planting date (November 6). Irrigation was also carried out at two levels of normal irrigation (NI) and irrigation interruption from flowering stage onwards. Experimental cultivars included ES Hydromel, ES Alonso, ES Darko, ES Lauren, and Ahmadi. According to the results, late-season drought stress and delayed planting date reduced leaf relative water content (LRWC), total chlorophyll content, proline, and grain yield, and increased stomatal resistance (SR), canopy temperature, and leaf soluble carbohydrates (CLS) in rapeseed cultivars. The highest grain yield (4505.6 kg ha–1) was obtained in NI conditions and PD1. Significant interactions of planting date, irrigation, and cultivar on LRWC, SR, and CLS traits indicated that the ES Hydromel was the most tolerant hybrid cultivar with the highest LRWC and the lowest SR and CLS levels compared to other ones in unfavourable conditions of late-season drought stress and delayed planting. To confirm these results, cluster analysis led to the formation of two clusters, where ES Darko, Ahmadi, and ES Lauren cultivars were placed in the sensitive cluster and ES Hydromel and ES Alonso cultivars were assigned to the tolerant cluster. Therefore, ES Hydromel can be introduced as a superior cultivar to be selected as a genotype that presents acceptable resistance under drought stress and late sowing in arid and semi-arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season drought and delayed planting reduced leaf relative water content, total chlorophyll content and proline in rapeseed cultivars.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
late-season drought stress and delayed planting datee0
Outcome
leaf relative water content (LRWC), total chlorophyll content, prolinee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“late-season drought stress and delayed planting date reduced leaf relative water content (LRWC), total chlorophyll content, proline, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1849 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season drought and delayed planting reduced rapeseed grain yield.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
late-season drought stress and delayed planting datee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“late-season drought stress and delayed planting date reduced leaf relative water content (LRWC), total chlorophyll content, proline, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1849 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season drought and delayed planting increased stomatal resistance, canopy temperature and leaf soluble carbohydrates.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
late-season drought stress and delayed planting datee1
Outcome
stomatal resistance (SR), canopy temperature, and leaf soluble carbohydrates (CLS)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased stomatal resistance (SR), canopy temperature, and leaf soluble carbohydrates (CLS) in rapeseed cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–1970 · show in text ↑
e1

“late-season drought stress and delayed planting date reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation on the regular planting date produced the highest grain yield, 4505.6 kg ha–1.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
NI conditions and PD1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4505.6 kg ha–1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (4505.6 kg ha–1) was obtained in NI conditions and PD1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1971–2050 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date, irrigation and cultivar interacted significantly for leaf relative water content.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
planting date, irrigation, and cultivare0
Outcome
LRWCe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interactions of planting date, irrigation, and cultivar on LRWC, SR, and CLS traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2146 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date, irrigation and cultivar interacted significantly for stomatal resistance.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
planting date, irrigation, and cultivare0
Outcome
SRe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interactions of planting date, irrigation, and cultivar on LRWC, SR, and CLS traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2146 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date, irrigation and cultivar interacted significantly for leaf soluble carbohydrates.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
planting date, irrigation, and cultivare0
Outcome
CLSe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interactions of planting date, irrigation, and cultivar on LRWC, SR, and CLS traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2146 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ES Hydromel had the highest leaf relative water content under late drought and delayed planting.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
ES Hydromele0
Outcome
LRWCe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
late-season drought stress and delayed plantinge0
Comparator
other onese0

Verbatim

e0

“ES Hydromel was the most tolerant hybrid cultivar with the highest LRWC and the lowest SR and CLS levels compared to other ones in unfavourable conditions of late-season drought stress and delayed planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2166–2372 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ES Hydromel had the lowest stomatal resistance under late drought and delayed planting.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
ES Hydromele0
Outcome
SRe0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
late-season drought stress and delayed plantinge0
Comparator
other onese0

Verbatim

e0

“ES Hydromel was the most tolerant hybrid cultivar with the highest LRWC and the lowest SR and CLS levels compared to other ones in unfavourable conditions of late-season drought stress and delayed planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2166–2372 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ES Hydromel had the lowest leaf soluble carbohydrate level under late drought and delayed planting.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
ES Hydromele0
Outcome
CLS levelse0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
late-season drought stress and delayed plantinge0
Comparator
other onese0

Verbatim

e0

“ES Hydromel was the most tolerant hybrid cultivar with the highest LRWC and the lowest SR and CLS levels compared to other ones in unfavourable conditions of late-season drought stress and delayed planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2166–2372 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis grouped ES Darko, Ahmadi and ES Lauren as drought-sensitive cultivars.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
ES Darko, Ahmadi, and ES Laurene0
Outcome
sensitive clustere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“ES Darko, Ahmadi, and ES Lauren cultivars were placed in the sensitive cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2460–2538 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis grouped ES Hydromel and ES Alonso as drought-tolerant cultivars.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
ES Hydromel and ES Alonsoe0
Outcome
tolerant clustere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“ES Hydromel and ES Alonso cultivars were assigned to the tolerant cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2543–2616 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose ES Hydromel for drought stress and late sowing in arid and semi-arid regions.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Material
ES Hydromele0
Outcome
superior cultivar to be selected as a genotype that presents acceptable resistancee0
Qualifier
drought stress and late sowing in arid and semi-arid regionse0

Verbatim

e0

“ES Hydromel can be introduced as a superior cultivar to be selected as a genotype that presents acceptable resistance under drought stress and late sowing in arid and semi-arid regions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2629–2814 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑

drought · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 5 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

drought · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 4 positive, 51 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

sowing time · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 39 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.