Paper · 2012 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Effects of fungicide, seeding date and seedling age on clubroot severity, seedling emergence and yield of canola

S. F. Hwang; T. Cao; Q. Xiao; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Hwang, S. F., Cao, T., Xiao, Q., Ahmed, H. U., Manolii, V. P., Turnbull, G. D., Gossen, B. D., Peng, G. and Strelkov, S. E. 2012. Effects of fungicide, seeding date and seedling age on clubroot severity, seedling emergence and yield of canola. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 1175–1186. The infestation of seeds by Plasmodiophora brassicae can result in the transmission of clubroot disease in canola. Five fungicides, including Dynasty 100 FS (azoxystrobin), Helix Xtra (thiamethoxam+difenoconazole+metataxyl+fludioxonil), Nebijin TM 5SC (flusulfamide), Prosper FX (clothianidin+carbathiin+trifloxystrobin+metalaxyl), and Vitavax RS (carbathiin+thiram), were evaluated under greenhouse conditions using artificially infested canola seeds for their efficacy in eliminating seed-borne inoculum. All of the fungicides significantly reduced clubroot relative to the non-treated control, but Nebijin TM 5SC and Dynasty 100 FS were the most effective. However, in field trials with Cruiser 5 FS (thiamethoxam), Helix Xtra, Dynasty, Prosper and Sedaxane (pyrazole anilide) applied alone or as a mixture, none of the treatments reduced clubroot severity or improved seedling emergence or yield compared with the insecticidal control (Cruiser 5 FS) in the susceptible cultivar. Clubroot severity was lower in early-seeded canola compared with the late-seeded crops in 2 site-years. The younger seedlings had greater disease severity and reduced plant height and yield than did older seedlings in both resistant and susceptible canola cultivars. We conclude that a combination of approaches including seed treatments and manipulation of seeding dates in conjunction with deployment of resistant cultivars is necessary for the sustainable management of clubroot in canola.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested fungicides reduced clubroot relative to untreated control in greenhouse trials.

Treatment
All of the fungicidese0
Interactor
Plasmodiophora brassicaePlasmodiophora brassicaee1pathogen
Outcome
clubroote0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plasmodiophora brassicae
Plasmodiophora brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All of the fungicides significantly reduced clubroot relative to the non-treated control, but Nebijin TM 5SC and Dynasty 100 FS were the most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“The infestation of seeds by Plasmodiophora brassicae can result in the transmission of clubroot disease in canola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nebijin TM 5SC was among the most effective fungicides against clubroot.

Treatment
Nebijin TM 5SCe0
Outcome
clubroote0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All of the fungicides significantly reduced clubroot relative to the non-treated control, but Nebijin TM 5SC and Dynasty 100 FS were the most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dynasty 100 FS was among the most effective fungicides against clubroot.

Treatment
Dynasty 100 FSe0
Outcome
clubroote0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All of the fungicides significantly reduced clubroot relative to the non-treated control, but Nebijin TM 5SC and Dynasty 100 FS were the most effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field fungicide treatments did not improve clubroot severity relative to Cruiser 5 FS in the susceptible cultivar.

Treatment
Helix Xtra, Dynasty, Prosper and Sedaxanee0
Outcome
clubroot severitye0
Direction
none of the treatments reducede0
Comparator
insecticidal control (Cruiser 5 FS)e0
Setting
field trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in field trials with Cruiser 5 FS (thiamethoxam), Helix Xtra, Dynasty, Prosper and Sedaxane (pyrazole anilide) applied alone or as a mixture, none of the treatments reduced clubroot severity or improved seedling emergence or yield compared with the insecticidal control (Cruiser 5 FS) in the susceptible cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field fungicide treatments did not improve seedling emergence relative to Cruiser 5 FS in the susceptible cultivar.

Treatment
Helix Xtra, Dynasty, Prosper and Sedaxanee0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
none of the treatments reduced clubroot severity or improvede0
Comparator
insecticidal control (Cruiser 5 FS)e0
Setting
field trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in field trials with Cruiser 5 FS (thiamethoxam), Helix Xtra, Dynasty, Prosper and Sedaxane (pyrazole anilide) applied alone or as a mixture, none of the treatments reduced clubroot severity or improved seedling emergence or yield compared with the insecticidal control (Cruiser 5 FS) in the susceptible cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field fungicide treatments did not improve yield relative to Cruiser 5 FS in the susceptible cultivar.

Treatment
Helix Xtra, Dynasty, Prosper and Sedaxanee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
none of the treatments reduced clubroot severity or improvede0
Comparator
insecticidal control (Cruiser 5 FS)e0
Setting
field trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in field trials with Cruiser 5 FS (thiamethoxam), Helix Xtra, Dynasty, Prosper and Sedaxane (pyrazole anilide) applied alone or as a mixture, none of the treatments reduced clubroot severity or improved seedling emergence or yield compared with the insecticidal control (Cruiser 5 FS) in the susceptible cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early seeding lowered clubroot severity in two site years.

Treatment
early-seedede0
Outcome
Clubroot severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
2 site-yearse0
Comparator
late-seeded cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clubroot severity was lower in early-seeded canola compared with the late-seeded crops in 2 site-years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1364 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Younger seedlings had greater disease severity than older seedlings.

Organ / stage
younger seedlingse0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
both resistant and susceptible canola cultivarse0
Comparator
older seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The younger seedlings had greater disease severity and reduced plant height and yield than did older seedlings in both resistant and susceptible canola cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1527 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Younger seedlings had reduced plant height than older seedlings.

Organ / stage
younger seedlingse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both resistant and susceptible canola cultivarse0
Comparator
older seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The younger seedlings had greater disease severity and reduced plant height and yield than did older seedlings in both resistant and susceptible canola cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1527 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Younger seedlings had reduced yield than older seedlings.

Organ / stage
younger seedlingse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both resistant and susceptible canola cultivarse0
Comparator
older seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The younger seedlings had greater disease severity and reduced plant height and yield than did older seedlings in both resistant and susceptible canola cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1527 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combining seed treatment, seeding date management and resistant cultivars for sustainable clubroot management.

Outcome
a combination of approaches including seed treatments and manipulation of seeding dates in conjunction with deployment of resistant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We conclude that a combination of approaches including seed treatments and manipulation of seeding dates in conjunction with deployment of resistant cultivars is necessary for the sustainable management of clubroot in canola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1753 · show in text ↑

fungicide · Plasmodiophora brassicae · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.