Paper · 1998 · Agronomy Journal

Efficacy of Treatments for Delaying Senescence of Wheat Leaves: II. Senescence and Grain Yield under Field Conditions

Mohamed Benbella; Gary M. Paulsen

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
82
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Longevity of leaves directly influences grain yield of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), but is greatly diminished by environmental stresses. The objective of these studies was to identify treatments that might delay senescence of wheat leaves and increase grain yield. ‘Nesma’ wheat was grown on a heavy clay soil at Meknes, Morocco, for two seasons, the first characterized by mild stress and the second by more severe stress from inadequate precipitation and high temperature. Three planting dates, two seeding rates, and foliar applications of NH 4 NO 3 , and KH 2 PO 4 in randomized complete block designs were tested for efficacy in delaying senescence of leaves as measured by proteolytic activity, chlorophyll and protein concentrations, and grain yield. Advancing the planting date from early December, the optimum time, to November in the first year and delaying planting until January in the second year reduced grain yields in both seasons. Increasing the seeding rate from 200 to 400 kernels in m ‐2 increased grain yields only in the second year, and foliar applications of 10 kg N as NH 4 NO 3 ha −1 were ineffective in both years. Foliar applications of 5 to 10 kg ha −1 KH 2 PO 4 , in contrast, often increased grain yields by 1 Mg ha −1 or more. Senescence processes were enhanced by late planting because of high temperatures during maturation and by dense seeding because of interplant competition. Treatments that increased grain yields usually slowed senescence processes. Applying dilute solutions of KH 2 PO 4 was most effective and, after further testing, might have merit for wheat in regions where drought and high‐temperature environmental stresses occur.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moving planting from early December to November reduced grain yield in the first season.

Treatment
Novembere0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
first yeare0
Comparator
early Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Advancing the planting date from early December, the optimum time, to November in the first year and delaying planting until January in the second year reduced grain yields in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying planting to January reduced grain yield in the second season.

Treatment
Januarye0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
second yeare0
Comparator
early Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Advancing the planting date from early December, the optimum time, to November in the first year and delaying planting until January in the second year reduced grain yields in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rate from 200 to 400 kernels m −2 increased grain yield only in the second year.

Treatment
400 kernels in m ‐2e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only in the second yeare0
Comparator
200e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the seeding rate from 200 to 400 kernels in m ‐2 increased grain yields only in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar NH 4 NO 3 was ineffective in both years.

Treatment
foliar applications of 10 kg N as NH 4 NO 3 ha −1e0
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar applications of 10 kg N as NH 4 NO 3 ha −1 were ineffective in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1151 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased grain yields only in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar KH 2 PO 4 often increased grain yields by at least 1 Mg ha −1.

Treatment
Foliar applications of 5 to 10 kg ha −1 KH 2 PO 4e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1 Mg ha −1 or moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of 5 to 10 kg ha −1 KH 2 PO 4 , in contrast, often increased grain yields by 1 Mg ha −1 or more.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting enhanced senescence processes under high maturation temperatures.

Treatment
late plantinge0
Outcome
Senescence processese0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
high temperatures during maturatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Senescence processes were enhanced by late planting because of high temperatures during maturation and by dense seeding because of interplant competition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dense seeding enhanced senescence processes through interplant competition.

Treatment
dense seedinge0
Outcome
Senescence processese1
Direction
enhancede1
Qualifier
interplant competitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by dense seeding because of interplant competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1423 · show in text ↑
e1

“Senescence processes were enhanced by late planting because of high temperatures during maturation and by dense seeding because of interplant competition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increasing treatments usually slowed senescence processes.

Treatment
Treatments that increased grain yieldse0
Outcome
senescence processese0
Direction
slowede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments that increased grain yields usually slowed senescence processes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest dilute KH 2 PO 4 solutions might help wheat in drought and high temperature regions after further testing.

Outcome
Applying dilute solutions of KH 2 PO 4e0
Qualifier
after further testinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying dilute solutions of KH 2 PO 4 was most effective and, after further testing, might have merit for wheat in regions where drought and high‐temperature environmental stresses occur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1689 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.