Paper · 2020 · American Journal of Botany

Effect of drought and carbon dioxide on nutrient uptake and levels of nutrient‐uptake proteins in roots of barley

Deepesh R. Bista; Scott A. Heckathorn; Dileepa M. Jayawardena; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Premise Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration is increasing, as is the frequency and duration of drought in some regions. Elevated CO 2 can decrease the effects of drought by further decreasing stomatal opening and, hence, water loss from leaves. Both elevated CO 2 and drought typically decrease plant nutrient concentration, but their interactive effects on nutrient status and uptake are little studied. We investigated whether elevated CO 2 helps negate the decrease in plant nutrient status during drought by upregulating nutrient‐uptake proteins in roots. Methods Barley ( Hordeum vulgare ) was subjected to current vs. elevated CO 2 (400 or 700 ppm) and drought vs. well‐watered conditions, after which we measured biomass, tissue nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations (%N and P), N‐ and P‐uptake rates, and the concentration of the major N‐ and P‐uptake proteins in roots. Results Elevated CO 2 decreased the impact of drought on biomass. In contrast, both drought and elevated CO 2 decreased %N and %P in most cases, and their effects were additive for shoots. Root N‐ and P‐uptake rates were strongly decreased by drought, but were not significantly affected by CO 2 . Averaged across treatments, both drought and high CO 2 resulted in upregulation of NRT1 (NO 3 − transporter) and AMT1 (NH 4 + transporter) per unit total root protein, while only drought increased PHT1 (P transporter). Conclusions Elevated CO 2 exacerbated decreases in %N and %P, and hence food quality, during drought, despite increases in the concentration of nutrient‐uptake proteins in roots, indicating other limitations to nutrient uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased the impact of drought on barley biomass.

Treatment
Elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
impact of drought on biomasse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“Elevated CO 2 decreased the impact of drought on biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased tissue N and P concentrations (%N and %P) in barley in most cases.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
%N and %Pe1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
in most casese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“both drought and elevated CO 2 decreased %N and %P in most cases, and their effects were additive for shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased tissue N and P concentrations (%N and %P) in barley in most cases.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
%N and %Pe1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
in most casese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“both drought and elevated CO 2 decreased %N and %P in most cases, and their effects were additive for shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effects of drought and elevated CO2 on %N and %P were additive for shoots.

Organ / stage
shootse1
Outcome
their effects were additivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“both drought and elevated CO 2 decreased %N and %P in most cases, and their effects were additive for shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root N- and P-uptake rates were strongly decreased by drought.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
Root N‐ and P‐uptake ratese1
Direction
strongly decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root N‐ and P‐uptake rates were strongly decreased by drought, but were not significantly affected by CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root N- and P-uptake rates were not significantly affected by elevated CO2.

Treatment
CO 2e1
Outcome
Root N‐ and P‐uptake ratese1
Direction
not significantly affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root N‐ and P‐uptake rates were strongly decreased by drought, but were not significantly affected by CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought upregulated NRT1 (NO3 transporter) and AMT1 (NH4 transporter) per unit total root protein, averaged across treatments.

Treatment
droughte1
Gene
NRT1 (NO 3 − transporter) and AMT1 (NH 4 + transporter)e1
Outcome
upregulatione1
Direction
upregulatione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“both drought and high CO 2 resulted in upregulation of NRT1 (NO 3 − transporter) and AMT1 (NH 4 + transporter) per unit total root protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 upregulated NRT1 (NO3 transporter) and AMT1 (NH4 transporter) per unit total root protein, averaged across treatments.

Treatment
high CO 2e1
Gene
NRT1 (NO 3 − transporter) and AMT1 (NH 4 + transporter)e1
Outcome
upregulatione1
Direction
upregulatione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“both drought and high CO 2 resulted in upregulation of NRT1 (NO 3 − transporter) and AMT1 (NH 4 + transporter) per unit total root protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only drought increased PHT1 (P transporter) concentration.

Treatment
droughte1
Gene
PHT1 (P transporter)e1
Outcome
PHT1 (P transporter)e1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“while only drought increased PHT1 (P transporter)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 exacerbated decreases in %N and %P, and hence food quality, during drought.

Treatment
Elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
decreases in %N and %Pe1
Direction
exacerbatede1
Qualifier
during droughte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“Elevated CO 2 exacerbated decreases in %N and %P, and hence food quality, during drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1518 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite increased concentrations of nutrient-uptake proteins in roots, nutrient uptake was limited by other factors.

Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Qualifier
other limitations to nutrient uptakee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley ( Hordeum vulgare )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“despite increases in the concentration of nutrient‐uptake proteins in roots, indicating other limitations to nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1644 · show in text ↑

co2 · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 3 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

co2 · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.