Paper · 2019 · Mechanization in agriculture & Conserving of the resources

The effect of mineral and liquid organic fertilisers on soil mineral nitrogen and chlorophyll content in winter wheat leaves

Danute Petraityte; Jurgita Cesevičienė; Aušra Arlauskienė; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of mineral and liquid organic fertilisers on the accumulation of nitrate and ammonium nitrogen in a clay loam Endocalcari Endohypogleyic Cambisol and on chlorophyll content in common winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori et Paol.) leaves. Ammonium nitrate was used as a mineral fertiliser. Liquid bio-fertilisers – pig slurry and anaerobic digestate – were studied with and without nitrification inhibitor (DMPP). In spring, after resumption of winter wheat vegetation, the investigated fertilizers were applied at N120 rate. Soil samples were taken from the 0-30 and 30-60 cm soil depths one and a half months after fertilisation. Dry weather prevailed during the study period. Results showed that the mineral nitrogen content in the soil varied depending on the fertiliser used and a slight effect of DMPP was observed. Compared to the unfertilised treatment, the highest and significant increase in mineral (nitrate and ammonium) nitrogen content was determined in the deeper soil layer of the mineral fertilisation treatment. Neither nitrogen rate nor fertilisers of different composition had influence on leaf chlorophyll content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil mineral nitrogen varied with fertilizer used.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertiliser usede0
Outcome
mineral nitrogen content in the soile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mineral nitrogen content in the soil varied depending on the fertiliser used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP had a slight effect on soil mineral nitrogen.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
DMPPe0
Outcome
mineral nitrogen content in the soile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mineral nitrogen content in the soil varied depending on the fertiliser used and a slight effect of DMPP was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilization significantly increased deeper-layer soil nitrate and ammonium nitrogen against unfertilized treatment.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
mineral fertilisation treatmente0
Outcome
mineral (nitrate and ammonium) nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
deeper soil layere0
Comparator
unfertilised treatmente0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the unfertilised treatment, the highest and significant increase in mineral (nitrate and ammonium) nitrogen content was determined in the deeper soil layer of the mineral fertilisation treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate did not influence wheat leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither nitrogen rate nor fertilisers of different composition had influence on leaf chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers of different composition did not influence wheat leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilisers of different compositione0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither nitrogen rate nor fertilisers of different composition had influence on leaf chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 92 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 92 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 123 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.