Paper · 2017 · Žemės ūkio mokslai

The influence of different nitrogen forms and application time on winter wheat

Vita Smalstienė; Irena Pranckietienė; Rūta Dromantienė; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The research was carried out at the Experimental Station of Aleksandras Stulginskis University during 2015–2016 on medium textured loamy carbonaceous leached soil – Cal(ca)ri-Epihypogleyic Luvisols. The soil of the experimental field was the following: pHKCl 6.8–7.2; phosphorus (P2O5) – 423– 429 mg kg–1; potassium (K2O) – 157–163 mg kg–1; humus – 2.47–2.82%. The researchers explored the winter wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.) variety ‘Skagen’ fertilized with amide (N-NH2), ammonium (N-NH4) and nitrate (N-NO3) forms of nitrogen fertilizers in different tillering stages (BBCH 21–29). 7 days after winter wheat was fertilized, the level of mineral nitrogen in the soil was on average 23.9% higher using ammonium–nitrate nitrogen form fertilizers than using amide nitrogen form ones. The index of chlorophyll and the area of leafs were essentially higher when ammonium– nitrate and amide forms of nitrogen fertilizers were used. The biggest effect on the index of chlorophyll and the area of leafs was achieved 16 days after the start of vegetation when plants were fertilized with ammonium–nitrate fertilizers. Plants fertilized with ammonium–nitrate fertilizers gave the biggest yield 4 days after the start of vegetation. Data of the experiment showed strong and statistically reliable bonds of the correlation between the grain yield and the time of fertilization with nitrogen fertilizers (ήamide nitrogen fertilizers = 0.850* and ήammonium–nitrate fertilizers = 0.878*).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium–nitrate fertilizer gave 23.9% higher soil mineral nitrogen than amide after seven days.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
ammonium–nitrate nitrogen form fertilizerse0
Outcome
level of mineral nitrogen in the soile0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.9%e0
Comparator
amide nitrogen form onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7 days after winter wheat was fertilized, the level of mineral nitrogen in the soil was on average 23.9% higher using ammonium–nitrate nitrogen form fertilizers than using amide nitrogen form ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium–nitrate fertilizers produced a higher chlorophyll index.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ammonium– nitratee0
Outcome
index of chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The index of chlorophyll and the area of leafs were essentially higher when ammonium– nitrate and amide forms of nitrogen fertilizers were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amide fertilizer produced a higher chlorophyll index.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
amide forms of nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
index of chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The index of chlorophyll and the area of leafs were essentially higher when ammonium– nitrate and amide forms of nitrogen fertilizers were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium–nitrate fertilizers produced larger leaf area.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ammonium– nitratee0
Outcome
area of leafse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The index of chlorophyll and the area of leafs were essentially higher when ammonium– nitrate and amide forms of nitrogen fertilizers were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amide fertilizer produced larger leaf area.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
amide forms of nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
area of leafse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The index of chlorophyll and the area of leafs were essentially higher when ammonium– nitrate and amide forms of nitrogen fertilizers were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium–nitrate fertilization at 16 days produced the greatest chlorophyll index and leaf area effects.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ammonium–nitrate fertilizerse0
Outcome
index of chlorophyll and the area of leafse0
Direction
biggeste0
Qualifier
16 days after the start of vegetatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biggest effect on the index of chlorophyll and the area of leafs was achieved 16 days after the start of vegetation when plants were fertilized with ammonium–nitrate fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium–nitrate fertilization four days after vegetation began gave the largest yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ammonium–nitrate fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
biggeste0
Qualifier
4 days after the start of vegetatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants fertilized with ammonium–nitrate fertilizers gave the biggest yield 4 days after the start of vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated significantly with timing of amide nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
amide nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
0.850*e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong and statistically reliable bonds of the correlation between the grain yield and the time of fertilization with nitrogen fertilizers (ήamide nitrogen fertilizers = 0.850* and ήammonium–nitrate fertilizers = 0.878*)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated significantly with timing of ammonium–nitrate fertilization.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ammonium–nitrate fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
0.878*e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong and statistically reliable bonds of the correlation between the grain yield and the time of fertilization with nitrogen fertilizers (ήamide nitrogen fertilizers = 0.850* and ήammonium–nitrate fertilizers = 0.878*)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–78 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 92 positive, 9 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.