Paper · 2020 · Applied Sciences

Nano-Formulations of Copper Species Coated with Sulfated Polysaccharide Extracts and Assessment of Their Phytotoxicity on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings in Seed Germination, Foliar and Soil Applications

Hanaa L. Essa; Mohamed S. Abdelfattah; Alaa S. Marzouk; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Copper nanoparticles were synthesized via a bioreduction using sulfated polysaccharides (SPs) extracted from Avicennia marina mangrove leaves and their phytotoxicity effect on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings was assessed. As analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), SPs extract constituted mainly 49.3% glucose, 24.6% galactose and 20.5% glucouronic acid by mol. A nanoformulation of ultrafine Cu2O/Cu(OH)2 nanoparticles coated with SPs (Cu NPs) was prepared with an average particle size of 2.11 ± 0.64 nm and a slightly negatively-charged zeta potential of 11 ± 0.46 mV. Applying high concentrations of Cu NPs on wheat seeds inhibited the respective shoot and root relative growth percentages, yielding 13.22 ± 9.91 and 36.72 ± 18.51% at 0.06 mg/mL of the nanoformulation. Comparable values were obtained when the seeds were subjected to 0.06 mg/L of SPs extract applied in the free form. In a foliar application, 0.06 mg/mL of Cu NPs reduced the respective total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents by 17.4% and 24.3% relative to the control while the treatment with SPs reduced them by slightly higher values of 27.9% and 32.6%, respectively, after 14 days of application. Therefore, Cu NPs show a comparable inhibition effect to that of the free SPs extract but offer the additional advantages of nanoformulations. In soil applications, however, Cu NPs stimulated the growth of wheat seedlings in contrary to SPs and increased the total chlorophyll and carotenoids by 49.76% and 70%, respectively. This gives an additional merit to the nanoformulation that can potentially be used as an effective biostimulant in soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High Cu NP concentrations inhibited wheat shoot relative growth; at 0.06 mg/mL it was 13.22 ± 9.91%.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
0.06 mg/mL of the nanoformulatione0
Outcome
shoot and root relative growth percentagese0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
13.22 ± 9.91e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying high concentrations of Cu NPs on wheat seeds inhibited the respective shoot and root relative growth percentages, yielding 13.22 ± 9.91 and 36.72 ± 18.51% at 0.06 mg/mL of the nanoformulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High Cu NP concentrations inhibited wheat root relative growth; at 0.06 mg/mL it was 36.72 ± 18.51%.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
0.06 mg/mL of the nanoformulatione0
Outcome
shoot and root relative growth percentagese0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
36.72 ± 18.51%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying high concentrations of Cu NPs on wheat seeds inhibited the respective shoot and root relative growth percentages, yielding 13.22 ± 9.91 and 36.72 ± 18.51% at 0.06 mg/mL of the nanoformulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Free SP extract produced comparable seed growth effects.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
0.06 mg/L of SPs extracte0
Outcome
Comparable valuese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparable values were obtained when the seeds were subjected to 0.06 mg/L of SPs extract applied in the free form.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Cu NPs reduced total chlorophyll by 17.4% versus control after 14 days.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
0.06 mg/mL of Cu NPse0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
reducede0
Value
17.4%e0
Qualifier
after 14 days of applicatione0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.06 mg/mL of Cu NPs reduced the respective total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents by 17.4% and 24.3% relative to the control while the treatment with SPs reduced them by slightly higher values of 27.9% and 32.6%, respectively, after 14 days of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Cu NPs reduced carotenoids by 24.3% versus control after 14 days.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
0.06 mg/mL of Cu NPse0
Outcome
carotenoids contentse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24.3%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.06 mg/mL of Cu NPs reduced the respective total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents by 17.4% and 24.3% relative to the control while the treatment with SPs reduced them by slightly higher values of 27.9% and 32.6%, respectively, after 14 days of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SPs reduced total chlorophyll by 27.9%.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
SPse0
Outcome
total chlorophylle1
Direction
reducede0
Value
27.9%e0
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with SPs reduced them by slightly higher values of 27.9% and 32.6%, respectively, after 14 days of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1202 · show in text ↑
e1

“total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents by 17.4% and 24.3% relative to the control while the treatment with SPs reduced them by slightly higher values of 27.9% and 32.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SPs reduced carotenoids by 32.6%.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
SPse0
Outcome
carotenoids contentse1
Direction
reducede0
Value
32.6%e0
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with SPs reduced them by slightly higher values of 27.9% and 32.6%, respectively, after 14 days of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1202 · show in text ↑
e1

“total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents by 17.4% and 24.3% relative to the control while the treatment with SPs reduced them by slightly higher values of 27.9% and 32.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applied Cu NPs stimulated wheat seedling growth relative to SPs.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cu NPse0
Outcome
growth of wheat seedlingse0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
SPse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In soil applications, however, Cu NPs stimulated the growth of wheat seedlings in contrary to SPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1443 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applied Cu NPs increased total chlorophyll by 49.76%.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cu NPse0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
49.76%e0
Comparator
SPse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu NPs stimulated the growth of wheat seedlings in contrary to SPs and increased the total chlorophyll and carotenoids by 49.76% and 70%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applied Cu NPs increased carotenoids by 70%.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cu NPse0
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
SPse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu NPs stimulated the growth of wheat seedlings in contrary to SPs and increased the total chlorophyll and carotenoids by 49.76% and 70%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest soil applied Cu NPs as a potential biostimulant.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
effective biostimulant in soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nanoformulation that can potentially be used as an effective biostimulant in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑

copper atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

copper atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

61 papers: 31 positive, 30 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 51 positive, 6 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.