Paper · 2010 · Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

Evaluation of No-tillage Rice Cover Crop Cropping Systems for Organic Farming

Young Han Lee

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate no-tillage cover crop cropping systems for organic farming in paddy. The experiment was performed at Ihyeon series (silt loam: 9.1% sand, 73.0% silt and 17.9% clay) which affected by different management practices. Planthopper population per 20 plant was significantly higher 65.3 for conventional tillage with chemical compounds (control) compared with 3.4~9.6 for no-tillage treatments (without rice straw or green manure, amended with rice straw, hairy vetch, rape, rye, and Chinese milk vetch). Also, disease severity of sheath blight was significantly higher 10.5% for control compared to 0.7~2.9% for no-tillage treatments. Four weed species, namely Monochoria vaginalis, Ludwigia prostrata, Rotala indica, and Aneilema keisak occurred in no-tillage paddy, whereas Monochoria vaginalis occurred in control only. The pH, available phosphate, and microbial biomass C in paddy were steeply decreased in response to submerging, but increased at first heading stage. Soil -N content at first heading stage was significantly higher in no-tillage treatments compared with control. The grain yield was significantly higher in 4.30 Mg for control than other treatments. Meanwhile, rice productivity was significantly higher in 2.69 Mg for no-tillage amended with Chinese milk vetch compared to other no-tillage treatments. The number of panicle per plant, grain number perpanicle, and percent ripened grain were highly related for increasing the yield of rice. These results show that Chinese milk vetch was optimum cover crop for organic farming in no-tillage paddy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planthopper population per 20 plants was significantly lower (3.4~9.6) in no-tillage treatments than in conventional tillage with chemicals (65.3).

Treatment
no-tillage treatmentse0
Interactor
Planthoppere0pest
Outcome
Planthopper population per 20 plante0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
3.4~9.6e0
Qualifier
65.3e0
Comparator
conventional tillage with chemical compounds (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“No-tillage Rice Cover Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Planthopper population per 20 plant was significantly higher 65.3 for conventional tillage with chemical compounds (control) compared with 3.4~9.6 for no-tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheath blight disease severity was significantly lower (0.7~2.9%) in no-tillage treatments than in the control (10.5%).

Treatment
no-tillage treatmentse0
Interactor
sheath blighte0pathogen
Outcome
disease severity of sheath blighte0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
0.7~2.9%e0
Qualifier
10.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“No-tillage Rice Cover Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“disease severity of sheath blight was significantly higher 10.5% for control compared to 0.7~2.9% for no-tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the control paddy only Monochoria vaginalis occurred.

Treatment
controle0
Interactor
Monochoria vaginalise0weed
Outcome
occurred in control onlye0
Direction
nae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“No-tillage Rice Cover Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“whereas Monochoria vaginalis occurred in control only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH, available phosphate and microbial biomass C in paddy decreased steeply in response to submerging.

Treatment
submerginge0
Outcome
pH, available phosphate, and microbial biomass Ce0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“No-tillage Rice Cover Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pH, available phosphate, and microbial biomass C in paddy were steeply decreased in response to submerging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N content at first heading stage was significantly higher in no-tillage treatments than in control.

Treatment
no-tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
Soil -N contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“No-tillage Rice Cover Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil -N content at first heading stage was significantly higher in no-tillage treatments compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice productivity was significantly higher (2.69 Mg) in no-tillage amended with Chinese milk vetch than in other no-tillage treatments.

Treatment
no-tillage amended with Chinese milk vetche0
Outcome
rice productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.69 Mge0
Comparator
other no-tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“No-tillage Rice Cover Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“rice productivity was significantly higher in 2.69 Mg for no-tillage amended with Chinese milk vetch compared to other no-tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1364 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of panicles per plant, grain number per panicle and percent ripened grain were highly related to increasing rice yield.

Organ / stage
paniclee0
Outcome
yield of ricee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“No-tillage Rice Cover Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of panicle per plant, grain number perpanicle, and percent ripened grain were highly related for increasing the yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1502 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese milk vetch was the optimum cover crop for organic farming in no-tillage paddy.

Outcome
optimum cover crope0
Setting
no-tillage paddye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“No-tillage Rice Cover Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chinese milk vetch was optimum cover crop for organic farming in no-tillage paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1609 · show in text ↑

tillage · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

tillage · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.