Paper · 2020 · Bangladesh Rice Journal

Estimation of Rice Yield Loss Using a Simple Linear Regression Model for Bacterial Blight Disease

T H Ansari; M Ahmed; S Akter; et al.

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out in hot and humid summer (Transplanted Aus) season to realize the yield loss of a susceptible rice variety Purbachi inoculated with bacterial blight (BB). Treatments consist of BB inoculations at different crop growth stages like maximum tillering (MT), panicle initiation (PI), booting (Bt), flowering and heading stages differently including a control (no BB inoculation). Disease severity index (DSI) was measured at 14 days after inoculation (DAI) and harvest. Data on 1000-grain-weight and yield was recorded at harvest. Significant variation on DSI was observed among different BB inoculated crop growth stages. MT, PI and Boot stage inoculations showed similar (DSI 7.1-8.0) but higher DSI than flowering and heading stages inoculation (3.2-5.3) even control (0.00) at 14 DAI. However, all the treatments showed similar DSI 9.0 at harvest. Bacterial blight can affect the grain weight to some extent although it was insignificant among the treatments (0.1-4.5%). DSI showed negative correlation with 1000-grain weight (r=-0.77*) and similarly with the yield (r=-0.97**). The yield ranged from 2.4-3.4 t/ha among the treatments. The yield loss was observed 5.8-30.4% in the BB inoculated treatments. MT, PI and Boot stages inoculation affected the yield much resulting 21-30.4% yield loss. It could be concluded that a susceptible variety can be affected with significant yield loss up to 30.4% with severe outbreak of B B. A simple regression equation = 4.09-0.211X( = Yield, X = BB severity score) is suggested for the prediction of yield loss in susceptible variety in summer season. Bangladesh Rice j. 2019, 23(1): 73-79

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial blight inoculation at maximum tillering, panicle initiation and booting stages caused 21-30.4% yield loss in susceptible rice variety Purbachi compared with the uninoculated control.

Material
Purbachie0
Treatment
MT, PI and Boot stages inoculatione5
Interactor
bacterial blighte0pathogen
Outcome
yield losse5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Value
21-30.4%e5
Comparator
control (no BB inoculation)e1
Setting
hot and humid summere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“MT, PI and Boot stages inoculation affected the yield much resulting 21-30.4% yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1326 · show in text ↑
e1

“including a control (no BB inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–405 · show in text ↑
e0

“a susceptible rice variety Purbachi inoculated with bacterial blight (BB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–185 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiment was carried out in hot and humid summer (Transplanted Aus) season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 14 days after inoculation, disease severity index was higher when bacterial blight was inoculated at maximum tillering, panicle initiation or booting than at flowering and heading.

Treatment
MT, PI and Boot stage inoculationse1
Interactor
bacterial blighte0pathogen
Outcome
DSIe1
Direction
highere1
Value
7.1-8.0e1
Qualifier
3.2-5.3e1
Comparator
flowering and heading stages inoculatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“MT, PI and Boot stage inoculations showed similar (DSI 7.1-8.0) but higher DSI than flowering and heading stages inoculation (3.2-5.3) even control (0.00) at 14 DAI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–814 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculated with bacterial blight (BB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–185 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, all treatments showed similar disease severity index of 9.0 in rice.

Outcome
DSIe1
Value
9.0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“all the treatments showed similar DSI 9.0 at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial blight had an insignificant effect on grain weight in rice, with differences among treatments of 0.1-4.5%.

Interactor
Bacterial blighte1pathogen
Outcome
grain weighte1
Value
0.1-4.5%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Bacterial blight can affect the grain weight to some extent although it was insignificant among the treatments (0.1-4.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity index was negatively correlated with 1000-grain weight in rice (r=-0.77).

Interactor
bacterial blighte0pathogen
Outcome
1000-grain weighte1
Direction
negative correlatione1
Value
r=-0.77*e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“DSI showed negative correlation with 1000-grain weight (r=-0.77*) and similarly with the yield (r=-0.97**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1108 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculated with bacterial blight (BB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–185 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity index was negatively correlated with yield in rice (r=-0.97).

Interactor
bacterial blighte0pathogen
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
negative correlatione1
Value
r=-0.97**e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“DSI showed negative correlation with 1000-grain weight (r=-0.77*) and similarly with the yield (r=-0.97**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1108 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculated with bacterial blight (BB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–185 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield loss in bacterial blight inoculated rice treatments ranged from 5.8% to 30.4%.

Interactor
BBe1pathogen
Outcome
yield losse1
Value
5.8-30.4%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The yield loss was observed 5.8-30.4% in the BB inoculated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield ranged from 2.4 to 3.4 t/ha among the inoculation treatments.

Outcome
yielde1
Value
2.4-3.4 t/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The yield ranged from 2.4-3.4 t/ha among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A simple regression equation, yield = 4.09 - 0.211 x BB severity score, is suggested for predicting yield loss in susceptible rice in the summer season.

Outcome
prediction of yield losse1
Value
4.09-0.211Xe1
Setting
summer seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A simple regression equation = 4.09-0.211X( = Yield, X = BB severity score) is suggested for the prediction of yield loss in susceptible variety in summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity index differed significantly among rice plants inoculated with bacterial blight at different growth stages.

Treatment
different BB inoculated crop growth stagese1
Interactor
BBe1pathogen
Outcome
DSIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Significant variation on DSI was observed among different BB inoculated crop growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield Loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 · show in text ↑

tillage · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

158 papers: 106 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

154 papers more in this group

See all 158 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 382 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 587 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.