Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at sugarcane research farm, Zadshyapur of S. Nijalingappa Sugar Institute (SNSI) of Belagavi which lies in northern transition zone of Karnataka (Zone-8) during 2017. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with four controls outside the experiment replicated thrice. The treatments included three row spacing as main plots (150 cm, 180 cm and 210 cm), inter cropping with sugarbeet, sweet sorghum and sweet potato with 1:1 and 1:2 ratio as sub-plots with four control plots (sole sugarcane (90 cm), sole sugarbeet, sole sweet sorghum and sole sweet potato) outside the experiment. On the basis of results obtained from present investigation, intercropping of sugarcane (150 cm) + sugarbeet 1:2 row proportion realised significantly higher net returns (₹ 2, 30, 211 ha -1).Sugarcane (180 cm) + sweet sorghum 1:2 row proportion recorded significantly higher B:C (3.12) and found at par with sugarcane (150 cm) + sweet sorghum 1:2 row (3.12). Sugarcane (150 cm) + sweet potato with 1:2 row proportion recorded significantly higher LER (1.46). Sugarcane (150 cm) + Sugarbeet with 1:2 row proportion recorded significantly higher ATER (1.17). Significantly higher competition ratio (4.66) in sugarcane was recorded by sugarcane (210 cm) + sugarbeet with 1:1 row proportion.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with sugarbeet at 150 cm and a 1:2 row proportion had significantly higher net returns.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- intercropping of sugarcane (150 cm) + sugarbeet 1:2 row proportione0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- ₹ 2, 30, 211 ha -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“intercropping of sugarcane (150 cm) + sugarbeet 1:2 row proportion realised significantly higher net returns (₹ 2, 30, 211 ha -1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with sweet sorghum at 180 cm and a 1:2 ratio had significantly higher B:C of 3.12.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- Sugarcane (180 cm) + sweet sorghum 1:2 row proportione0
- Outcome
- B:Ce0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.12e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Sugarcane (180 cm) + sweet sorghum 1:2 row proportion recorded significantly higher B:C (3.12)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with sweet sorghum at 150 cm and a 1:2 ratio was at par in B:C with the 180 cm arrangement.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“found at par with sugarcane (150 cm) + sweet sorghum 1:2 row (3.12)”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with sweet potato at 150 cm and a 1:2 ratio had significantly higher LER of 1.46.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- Sugarcane (150 cm) + sweet potato with 1:2 row proportione0
- Outcome
- LERe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.46e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Sugarcane (150 cm) + sweet potato with 1:2 row proportion recorded significantly higher LER (1.46)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with sugarbeet at 150 cm and a 1:2 ratio had significantly higher ATER of 1.17.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- Sugarcane (150 cm) + Sugarbeet with 1:2 row proportione0
- Outcome
- ATERe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.17e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Sugarcane (150 cm) + Sugarbeet with 1:2 row proportion recorded significantly higher ATER (1.17)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane at 210 cm with sugarbeet at a 1:1 ratio had significantly higher competition ratio of 4.66.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- sugarcane (210 cm) + sugarbeet with 1:1 row proportione0
- Outcome
- competition ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.66e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher competition ratio (4.66) in sugarcane was recorded by sugarcane (210 cm) + sugarbeet with 1:1 row proportion”
The same questions in other papers
Ipomoea batatas · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
Sorghum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.