Paper · 2008 · Pakistan Sugar Journal

EFFECT OF SPACING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF AUTUMN SOWN SUGARCANE INTERCROPPED WITH SUGARBEET

Muhammad Azhar Munir; Muhammad Sarwar; Javid Iqbal; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An intercropping trial of sugarcane with sugar-beet was carried out at Sugarcane Research Institute, Faisalabad to evaluate the effect of spacing on yield & quality and economic benefits of both the crops during the years 2003-2004 & 2004-2005. The experiment was laidout in Randomized Complete Block Design having net plot size of 3.6 x 8 m2 . Single and double rows of sugar beet were planted in sugarcane spaced at 120, 90 and 60 cm. However, the maximum cane and sugar beet yields were obtained from treatments where both the crops were planted alone. Average of two years data revealed that maximum cane yield of intercropped sugarcane (101.50 t ha-1 ) with sugar beet yield of 59.74 t ha-1 was obtained when sugarcane was planted at 120 cm apart trenches with one row of sugar-beet. Hence, maximum income was also recorded in the same treatment (1,61,245 Rs. ha-1 ) as against alone sugarcane 1,04,588 Rs. ha-1 and alone sugarbeet 99,141 Rs. ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting both crops alone gave the maximum cane and sugar beet yields compared with intercropping treatments.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
planted alonee1
Outcome
cane and sugar beet yieldse1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“AUTUMN SOWN SUGARCANE INTERCROPPED WITH SUGARBEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum cane and sugar beet yields were obtained from treatments where both the crops were planted alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane planted at 120 cm apart trenches with one row of sugar beet gave the maximum cane yield of 101.50 t ha-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sugarcane was planted at 120 cm apart trenches with one row of sugar-beete2
Outcome
cane yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
101.50 t ha-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“AUTUMN SOWN SUGARCANE INTERCROPPED WITH SUGARBEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“maximum cane yield of intercropped sugarcane (101.50 t ha-1 ) with sugar beet yield of 59.74 t ha-1 was obtained when sugarcane was planted at 120 cm apart trenches with one row of sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet yield of 59.74 t ha-1 was obtained at the maximum cane yield, when sugarcane was planted at 120 cm apart trenches with one row of sugar beet.

Treatment
sugarcane was planted at 120 cm apart trenches with one row of sugar-beete2
Outcome
sugar beet yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
59.74 t ha-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“maximum cane yield of intercropped sugarcane (101.50 t ha-1 ) with sugar beet yield of 59.74 t ha-1 was obtained when sugarcane was planted at 120 cm apart trenches with one row of sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane at 120 cm spacing with one row of sugar beet gave the maximum income of 1,61,245 Rs. ha-1, compared with alone sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sugarcane was planted at 120 cm apart trenches with one row of sugar-beete2
Outcome
incomee3
Direction
maximume3
Value
1,61,245 Rs. ha-1e3
Qualifier
1,04,588 Rs. ha-1e3
Comparator
alone sugarcanee3

Verbatim

t0

“AUTUMN SOWN SUGARCANE INTERCROPPED WITH SUGARBEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugarcane was planted at 120 cm apart trenches with one row of sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–787 · show in text ↑
e3

“Hence, maximum income was also recorded in the same treatment (1,61,245 Rs. ha-1 ) as against alone sugarcane 1,04,588 Rs. ha-1 and alone sugarbeet 99,141 Rs. ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–952 · show in text ↑

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 39 positive, 3 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.